- This topic has 19 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 3 months ago by carlislematthew.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 4, 2006 at 1:05 PM #6808July 4, 2006 at 2:29 PM #27741AnonymousGuest
Even with loss of capital with renting and the lack of tax breaks when not having mortgage interest to deduct, real estate in the best appreciating areas still trail the SP 500 or any index fund. So if you are worried about losing money by renting or not owning, you will still not be as well off as if you plow your money into low cost stock funds. Think property taxes, interest charges maintenance….
July 4, 2006 at 2:53 PM #27742ocrenterParticipantgood questions. I would keep renting and save as much money as humanly possible. Sure, you are taking a big hit tax-wise. We are too, so you are not alone out there. You may be able to pick up quite a bit of rental properties in IE at half off in 3-5 years, making them income generators, not monthly losses.
As for OC, we weren’t sure how long we had to wait. And given the tax issues, we couldn’t afford to keep waiting for OC to drop to the bottom. Another issue with OC is the prices are so high, even a 20-30% fall would still be pricey. So we moved to a place where we felt the prices are actually falling right now in real time so the wait wouldn’t be so long and endless.
July 4, 2006 at 4:08 PM #27746powaysellerParticipantConsult with a tax professional regarding your rental ideas. Michael Gallon, CPA, in El Cajon. His number is 619-440-4780.
A CPA comes up with ideas and knowledge you will never get on this forum.
Personally, I am afraid of RE anywhere in the country. What is a safe place, where you know prices will not go down? I don’t know of any. Even Omaha, NE, a place protected from zany bubbleland is experiencing a slowing housing market, reduced pricing, more foreclosures. How far can prices fall there? Maybe only 5-15%? ARMs were used there, and construction was a major source of hiring.
The 2007 recession will cause prices to fall nationwide, because there is a national housing glut and national exotic loan usage.
July 4, 2006 at 5:32 PM #27750UP IN ARMSParticipantGive ur cash to me, I’ll hide it for ya 🙂
July 4, 2006 at 8:51 PM #27753synchroParticipantDo yourself a favor: buy a ladder of Treasury Bills and ntoes maturing anywhere from 3 montsh to 5yrs. They are yielding 5%+, and exempt from California’s state income tax (9%+ if I recall before I escaped).
Cash is not trash anymore. That 5% from Treasuries is getting more competitive vs stocks or real estate considering the risks you have to take in those markets.
In a year, you will be happy to learn that cash is all of a sudden an “asset class” once again.
July 4, 2006 at 11:24 PM #27756powaysellerParticipantOh, so here we have the advantage of Tbills over higher paying CDs. Tbills are state-tax free. Thanks for the info.
July 5, 2006 at 12:44 AM #27757rankandfileParticipantHere’s a good article on cash and T-Bills.
href=”http://www.newsmax.com/money/archives/articles/2006/4/13/152237.cfmIt mentions that another benefit to investing in cash is its liquidity…you can get it back in a hurry if need be. It also mentioned that interest-bearing cash accounts actually outperformed the Dow for 20 years (1966-1986).
July 5, 2006 at 12:56 AM #27758rankandfileParticipantI am not an expert, but similar to other advice given, it might be in your best interest to spend some money on a tax specialist. If you plan on buying something out of state, you might want to look into a local tax specialist/CPA as well. I don’t know if this is imperitive, but it might be worth looking into.
July 5, 2006 at 7:53 AM #27763Stu949ParticipantJust wanted to say thanks to everyone for the feedback!
My initial thought was that it isn’t worth buying a rental property just for the tax break, and I think I will stick with that line of thinking.
At this point, who is worse? The government or Mr. and Mrs. homeowner who don’t deserve the profit on their house? I’d almost say that I would rather give the government more money.
I can’t justify handing over a huge profit to these unreasonable homeowners! Besides, I think we will run out of bigger fools – I’ll be stuck with anything I buy!
July 5, 2006 at 7:54 AM #27764Stu949ParticipantJust wanted to say thanks to everyone for the feedback!
My initial thought was that it isn’t worth buying a rental property just for the tax break, and I think I will stick with that line of thinking.
At this point, who is worse? The government or Mr. and Mrs. homeowner who don’t deserve the profit on their house? I’d almost say that I would rather give the government more money.
I can’t justify handing over a huge profit to these unreasonable homeowners! Besides, I think we will run out of bigger fools – I’ll be stuck with anything I buy!
July 5, 2006 at 10:54 AM #27769powaysellerParticipantI hope that anyone with income over $80K has the advice of a tax advisor. I can’t tell you how many things this guy comes up with, that I missed, at tax time, and how much good advice he gives me.
I took my sister, to him, after she and my mom had spent days filing her tax return. Both ladies are very intelligent. My mom is a math wiz and my sister a surgeon. The CPA found omissions on her federal return, and tripled her federal refund, plus found more she could deduct for the state. He also gave her some good advice. Cost: under $200 for everything.
I am surprised by how reluctant people are to consult with a laywer or tax advisor. If you haven’t seen a good tax advisor, you have a chance of overpaying on your taxes. Enough said.
July 5, 2006 at 2:31 PM #27777burger007ParticipantPoway seller:
Do you have the info on the CPA that you recommend?? I am still looking for a good CPA(not a shaddy CPA, had one of those and felt very uncomfortable) I have tried 3 the past 3 years and so far none of them has found anything that i have missed(I am not a CPA, just read a lot of the tax laws). I did my own taxes and then sent over my info to the CPA’s(1 different one per year, not 3 CPA’s in one year) and when they all have come back each year, they come out with the same numbers as I have, but then I had to pay 400 bucks (yah I probably got ripped off , but then again I had a house and also a rental which may have added to the cost)each year, so that is why this coming tax year I may just do it myself( no more rental house, just a house and regular stock stuff that is pretty straight forward). I am open to finding help.
July 5, 2006 at 5:32 PM #27781powaysellerParticipantI don’t know if this CPA is better than yours. I posted his name in this thread, so look on page 1 of this thread, the 3rd post. I like him because he’s smart, nice, and has low overhead (small office in a low-rent building next to the courthouse in El Cajon, no personal secretary), so his prices are good.
I am more surprised at the person who started this thread, who is considering a rental property, doesn’t know if he’ll save money on taxes or gets hit with the AMT tax, and is not interested in conferring with a CPA. There was a guy on another thread facing eviction because his rental home was being foreclosed, and he didn’t want to spend $200 on an attorney. I am surprised at the strong avoidance of professional help.
July 5, 2006 at 6:10 PM #27783ocrenterParticipantpoway, don’t take it the wrong way, but just because I didn’t respond doesn’t mean I didn’t meet up with him. That law firm is currently assisting me with a small claims issue. as for the eviction issue, he’s not going to be able to help me until the actual NOD gets filed. What was briefly stated was the offer to fight the eviction if the bank actually takes over the property. what was NOT said was an eviction filing of the said address may damage my credit report significantly. right now the owner (who is in default but has not had the NOD officially filed) is trying to obtain refinancing for the property. all the power to him and I hope he is successful in delaying the inevitable, at least for a year.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.