What are people talking about?

[moneymaker]

While at the beach today I overheard people talking of moving to Wyoming, Montana, etc. Then I remember how it was a couple of years ago, when a crowd of people got together the topic eventually turned to real estate. Is this the new hot topic at parties? Leaving CA

[bsrsharma]

Leaving CA

This has been quite hot since at least 2004. But why MT & WY; what do they want to do there, other than just retiring? In terms of economic liveliness, South and Southeast seem to have some vitality. Also, with increasing energy costs, cold places are expensive to live.

[bsrsharma]

Leaving CA

This has been quite hot since at least 2004. But why MT & WY; what do they want to do there, other than just retiring? In terms of economic liveliness, South and Southeast seem to have some vitality. Also, with increasing energy costs, cold places are expensive to live.

[bsrsharma]

Leaving CA

This has been quite hot since at least 2004. But why MT & WY; what do they want to do there, other than just retiring? In terms of economic liveliness, South and Southeast seem to have some vitality. Also, with increasing energy costs, cold places are expensive to live.

[bsrsharma]

Leaving CA

This has been quite hot since at least 2004. But why MT & WY; what do they want to do there, other than just retiring? In terms of economic liveliness, South and Southeast seem to have some vitality. Also, with increasing energy costs, cold places are expensive to live.

[bsrsharma]

Leaving CA

This has been quite hot since at least 2004. But why MT & WY; what do they want to do there, other than just retiring? In terms of economic liveliness, South and Southeast seem to have some vitality. Also, with increasing energy costs, cold places are expensive to live.

[EconProf]

MT & WY have: lower taxes, cheaper housing, better schools, less congestion, way lower unemployment rates, clean and honest governments, nature in abundance.
CA has: better weather.

[EconProf]

MT & WY have: lower taxes, cheaper housing, better schools, less congestion, way lower unemployment rates, clean and honest governments, nature in abundance.
CA has: better weather.

[EconProf]

MT & WY have: lower taxes, cheaper housing, better schools, less congestion, way lower unemployment rates, clean and honest governments, nature in abundance.
CA has: better weather.

[EconProf]

MT & WY have: lower taxes, cheaper housing, better schools, less congestion, way lower unemployment rates, clean and honest governments, nature in abundance.
CA has: better weather.

[EconProf]

MT & WY have: lower taxes, cheaper housing, better schools, less congestion, way lower unemployment rates, clean and honest governments, nature in abundance.
CA has: better weather.

[jficquette]

I think no one wants to leave but feel they should so they gather strength from others who feel the same way.

John

[jficquette]

I think no one wants to leave but feel they should so they gather strength from others who feel the same way.

John

[jficquette]

I think no one wants to leave but feel they should so they gather strength from others who feel the same way.

John

[jficquette]

I think no one wants to leave but feel they should so they gather strength from others who feel the same way.

John

[Author]

Posts