Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Wells Fargo buys Wachovia
- This topic has 5 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 7 months ago by Coronita.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 3, 2008 at 3:00 PM #14060October 3, 2008 at 3:18 PM #280320CoronitaParticipant
Don’t think you need to worry. this was a clear strategy on wells’ part, and the timing couldn’t appear more evident.
Wells didnt initially bid on wachovia, me thinks because the outcome of the bailout was unclear. Then suddenly, day before house vote, the put in a bid well over on top of citibank???
Me thinks they took a chance counting on bailout 2.0 and hence knew by topping citi’s offer they would get to keep all of wac’s good assets and wash all the bad ones off to the fed.
Furthermore, me thinks the merger and acquistion activity among banks are going to heat up next few weeks. Because it’s as if the bailout bill is an open check for one bank to acquire another and jettison what shitty assets it doesnt want to the taxpayer
So the question will be which shitty bank will be bought next for an overly inflated price by the next bigger bank that will eventually pick it clean like a vulture and leave the remaining crap to us taxpayers?
Downey?? Maybe it’s time to go long on a lot of these shit banks
October 3, 2008 at 3:18 PM #280592CoronitaParticipantDon’t think you need to worry. this was a clear strategy on wells’ part, and the timing couldn’t appear more evident.
Wells didnt initially bid on wachovia, me thinks because the outcome of the bailout was unclear. Then suddenly, day before house vote, the put in a bid well over on top of citibank???
Me thinks they took a chance counting on bailout 2.0 and hence knew by topping citi’s offer they would get to keep all of wac’s good assets and wash all the bad ones off to the fed.
Furthermore, me thinks the merger and acquistion activity among banks are going to heat up next few weeks. Because it’s as if the bailout bill is an open check for one bank to acquire another and jettison what shitty assets it doesnt want to the taxpayer
So the question will be which shitty bank will be bought next for an overly inflated price by the next bigger bank that will eventually pick it clean like a vulture and leave the remaining crap to us taxpayers?
Downey?? Maybe it’s time to go long on a lot of these shit banks
October 3, 2008 at 3:18 PM #280599CoronitaParticipantDon’t think you need to worry. this was a clear strategy on wells’ part, and the timing couldn’t appear more evident.
Wells didnt initially bid on wachovia, me thinks because the outcome of the bailout was unclear. Then suddenly, day before house vote, the put in a bid well over on top of citibank???
Me thinks they took a chance counting on bailout 2.0 and hence knew by topping citi’s offer they would get to keep all of wac’s good assets and wash all the bad ones off to the fed.
Furthermore, me thinks the merger and acquistion activity among banks are going to heat up next few weeks. Because it’s as if the bailout bill is an open check for one bank to acquire another and jettison what shitty assets it doesnt want to the taxpayer
So the question will be which shitty bank will be bought next for an overly inflated price by the next bigger bank that will eventually pick it clean like a vulture and leave the remaining crap to us taxpayers?
Downey?? Maybe it’s time to go long on a lot of these shit banks
October 3, 2008 at 3:18 PM #280640CoronitaParticipantDon’t think you need to worry. this was a clear strategy on wells’ part, and the timing couldn’t appear more evident.
Wells didnt initially bid on wachovia, me thinks because the outcome of the bailout was unclear. Then suddenly, day before house vote, the put in a bid well over on top of citibank???
Me thinks they took a chance counting on bailout 2.0 and hence knew by topping citi’s offer they would get to keep all of wac’s good assets and wash all the bad ones off to the fed.
Furthermore, me thinks the merger and acquistion activity among banks are going to heat up next few weeks. Because it’s as if the bailout bill is an open check for one bank to acquire another and jettison what shitty assets it doesnt want to the taxpayer
So the question will be which shitty bank will be bought next for an overly inflated price by the next bigger bank that will eventually pick it clean like a vulture and leave the remaining crap to us taxpayers?
Downey?? Maybe it’s time to go long on a lot of these shit banks
October 3, 2008 at 3:18 PM #280651CoronitaParticipantDon’t think you need to worry. this was a clear strategy on wells’ part, and the timing couldn’t appear more evident.
Wells didnt initially bid on wachovia, me thinks because the outcome of the bailout was unclear. Then suddenly, day before house vote, the put in a bid well over on top of citibank???
Me thinks they took a chance counting on bailout 2.0 and hence knew by topping citi’s offer they would get to keep all of wac’s good assets and wash all the bad ones off to the fed.
Furthermore, me thinks the merger and acquistion activity among banks are going to heat up next few weeks. Because it’s as if the bailout bill is an open check for one bank to acquire another and jettison what shitty assets it doesnt want to the taxpayer
So the question will be which shitty bank will be bought next for an overly inflated price by the next bigger bank that will eventually pick it clean like a vulture and leave the remaining crap to us taxpayers?
Downey?? Maybe it’s time to go long on a lot of these shit banks
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.