- This topic has 80 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 12 months ago by
CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 6, 2009 at 6:39 PM #394754May 7, 2009 at 9:46 AM #394349
donaldduckmoore
ParticipantNationalization is the answer at least for now. These banks are going the extremes and they do not cooperate most of the time. Even when in this crisis, they still think they own the world.
May 7, 2009 at 9:46 AM #394606ParticipantNationalization is the answer at least for now. These banks are going the extremes and they do not cooperate most of the time. Even when in this crisis, they still think they own the world.
May 7, 2009 at 9:46 AM #394823ParticipantNationalization is the answer at least for now. These banks are going the extremes and they do not cooperate most of the time. Even when in this crisis, they still think they own the world.
May 7, 2009 at 9:46 AM #394876ParticipantNationalization is the answer at least for now. These banks are going the extremes and they do not cooperate most of the time. Even when in this crisis, they still think they own the world.
May 7, 2009 at 9:46 AM #395019ParticipantNationalization is the answer at least for now. These banks are going the extremes and they do not cooperate most of the time. Even when in this crisis, they still think they own the world.
May 7, 2009 at 11:10 AM #394445sd_matt
ParticipantIt’s easy to feel you own the world when you have massive $$ to prop you up.
What about letting the irresponsible fall and then give the $$$ to the responsible so that they can pick up the pieces? You know… rewarding the competent. Now whom do you think is more competent; politicians or the banks that aren’t a reflection of the current real estate market?
May 7, 2009 at 11:10 AM #394700ParticipantIt’s easy to feel you own the world when you have massive $$ to prop you up.
What about letting the irresponsible fall and then give the $$$ to the responsible so that they can pick up the pieces? You know… rewarding the competent. Now whom do you think is more competent; politicians or the banks that aren’t a reflection of the current real estate market?
May 7, 2009 at 11:10 AM #394918ParticipantIt’s easy to feel you own the world when you have massive $$ to prop you up.
What about letting the irresponsible fall and then give the $$$ to the responsible so that they can pick up the pieces? You know… rewarding the competent. Now whom do you think is more competent; politicians or the banks that aren’t a reflection of the current real estate market?
May 7, 2009 at 11:10 AM #394971ParticipantIt’s easy to feel you own the world when you have massive $$ to prop you up.
What about letting the irresponsible fall and then give the $$$ to the responsible so that they can pick up the pieces? You know… rewarding the competent. Now whom do you think is more competent; politicians or the banks that aren’t a reflection of the current real estate market?
May 7, 2009 at 11:10 AM #395114ParticipantIt’s easy to feel you own the world when you have massive $$ to prop you up.
What about letting the irresponsible fall and then give the $$$ to the responsible so that they can pick up the pieces? You know… rewarding the competent. Now whom do you think is more competent; politicians or the banks that aren’t a reflection of the current real estate market?
May 7, 2009 at 1:33 PM #394555aldante
Participant[quote=DoJC]And what would be the alternative? Do you actually think that government run institutions would be better?
Weren’t Fannie/Freddie/Indy one of the first entities to encounter massive problems? How did these GSEs fare?[/quote]
Best alternative I have seen is right here:
Bottom line is that they are already nationalized the tax payer is just on the hook for losses…the executives get the profits – this is, unless something is done.
May 7, 2009 at 1:33 PM #394810Participant[quote=DoJC]And what would be the alternative? Do you actually think that government run institutions would be better?
Weren’t Fannie/Freddie/Indy one of the first entities to encounter massive problems? How did these GSEs fare?[/quote]
Best alternative I have seen is right here:
Bottom line is that they are already nationalized the tax payer is just on the hook for losses…the executives get the profits – this is, unless something is done.
May 7, 2009 at 1:33 PM #395028Participant[quote=DoJC]And what would be the alternative? Do you actually think that government run institutions would be better?
Weren’t Fannie/Freddie/Indy one of the first entities to encounter massive problems? How did these GSEs fare?[/quote]
Best alternative I have seen is right here:
Bottom line is that they are already nationalized the tax payer is just on the hook for losses…the executives get the profits – this is, unless something is done.
May 7, 2009 at 1:33 PM #395080Participant[quote=DoJC]And what would be the alternative? Do you actually think that government run institutions would be better?
Weren’t Fannie/Freddie/Indy one of the first entities to encounter massive problems? How did these GSEs fare?[/quote]
Best alternative I have seen is right here:
Bottom line is that they are already nationalized the tax payer is just on the hook for losses…the executives get the profits – this is, unless something is done.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.