- This topic has 101 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 9 months ago by
Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 27, 2011 at 6:39 AM #714393July 27, 2011 at 8:47 AM #713228
(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantHere is one with prices from 1963 to today.
Looking at the update and the old chart in this post, it would appear that housing (relative to gold) is cheaper than all but the following periods since 1920:
– 1930’s Depression
– early 1980’s gold spike.So, which case more closely resembles todays situation ?
July 27, 2011 at 8:47 AM #713322ParticipantHere is one with prices from 1963 to today.
Looking at the update and the old chart in this post, it would appear that housing (relative to gold) is cheaper than all but the following periods since 1920:
– 1930’s Depression
– early 1980’s gold spike.So, which case more closely resembles todays situation ?
July 27, 2011 at 8:47 AM #713919ParticipantHere is one with prices from 1963 to today.
Looking at the update and the old chart in this post, it would appear that housing (relative to gold) is cheaper than all but the following periods since 1920:
– 1930’s Depression
– early 1980’s gold spike.So, which case more closely resembles todays situation ?
July 27, 2011 at 8:47 AM #714070ParticipantHere is one with prices from 1963 to today.
Looking at the update and the old chart in this post, it would appear that housing (relative to gold) is cheaper than all but the following periods since 1920:
– 1930’s Depression
– early 1980’s gold spike.So, which case more closely resembles todays situation ?
July 27, 2011 at 8:47 AM #714429ParticipantHere is one with prices from 1963 to today.
Looking at the update and the old chart in this post, it would appear that housing (relative to gold) is cheaper than all but the following periods since 1920:
– 1930’s Depression
– early 1980’s gold spike.So, which case more closely resembles todays situation ?
July 27, 2011 at 2:19 PM #713323ParticipantJuly 27, 2011 at 2:19 PM #713417ParticipantJuly 27, 2011 at 2:19 PM #714013ParticipantJuly 27, 2011 at 2:19 PM #714165ParticipantJuly 27, 2011 at 2:19 PM #714523ParticipantJuly 27, 2011 at 9:10 PM #713413moneymaker
ParticipantSo I can buy a house with less than 15 lbs of gold. Seems like I should start prospecting for a living. Maybe a super conducting metal detector with discriminator. I’ll bet these cash for gold places are making a killing ripping people off. I think I remember once calculating that the stuff in the Vicks inhaler was worth more than gold, of course that was probably when gold was only worth $300/oz.
July 27, 2011 at 9:10 PM #713507ParticipantSo I can buy a house with less than 15 lbs of gold. Seems like I should start prospecting for a living. Maybe a super conducting metal detector with discriminator. I’ll bet these cash for gold places are making a killing ripping people off. I think I remember once calculating that the stuff in the Vicks inhaler was worth more than gold, of course that was probably when gold was only worth $300/oz.
July 27, 2011 at 9:10 PM #714102ParticipantSo I can buy a house with less than 15 lbs of gold. Seems like I should start prospecting for a living. Maybe a super conducting metal detector with discriminator. I’ll bet these cash for gold places are making a killing ripping people off. I think I remember once calculating that the stuff in the Vicks inhaler was worth more than gold, of course that was probably when gold was only worth $300/oz.
July 27, 2011 at 9:10 PM #714254ParticipantSo I can buy a house with less than 15 lbs of gold. Seems like I should start prospecting for a living. Maybe a super conducting metal detector with discriminator. I’ll bet these cash for gold places are making a killing ripping people off. I think I remember once calculating that the stuff in the Vicks inhaler was worth more than gold, of course that was probably when gold was only worth $300/oz.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.