- This topic has 50 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 11 months ago by
34f3f3f.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 30, 2008 at 8:56 AM #214166May 30, 2008 at 9:27 AM #214030
JWM in SD
ParticipantActually Ex-SD, the big concern should not be with consumer banks, but rather commercial banks and / or banks which have a large business lending practice going. When small to medium sized businesses get reductions in their LOCs or have their cost of capital raised, then watch the layoffs ensue. This is the real systemic risk that Bernanke, et al are afraid of.
May 30, 2008 at 9:27 AM #214109ParticipantActually Ex-SD, the big concern should not be with consumer banks, but rather commercial banks and / or banks which have a large business lending practice going. When small to medium sized businesses get reductions in their LOCs or have their cost of capital raised, then watch the layoffs ensue. This is the real systemic risk that Bernanke, et al are afraid of.
May 30, 2008 at 9:27 AM #214132ParticipantActually Ex-SD, the big concern should not be with consumer banks, but rather commercial banks and / or banks which have a large business lending practice going. When small to medium sized businesses get reductions in their LOCs or have their cost of capital raised, then watch the layoffs ensue. This is the real systemic risk that Bernanke, et al are afraid of.
May 30, 2008 at 9:27 AM #214158ParticipantActually Ex-SD, the big concern should not be with consumer banks, but rather commercial banks and / or banks which have a large business lending practice going. When small to medium sized businesses get reductions in their LOCs or have their cost of capital raised, then watch the layoffs ensue. This is the real systemic risk that Bernanke, et al are afraid of.
May 30, 2008 at 9:27 AM #214186ParticipantActually Ex-SD, the big concern should not be with consumer banks, but rather commercial banks and / or banks which have a large business lending practice going. When small to medium sized businesses get reductions in their LOCs or have their cost of capital raised, then watch the layoffs ensue. This is the real systemic risk that Bernanke, et al are afraid of.
May 30, 2008 at 11:09 AM #214135macmichael
ParticipantRegional banks moved to commercial real estate loans after about 1995 and they keep these on their books. As retail and office vacancy rates rise there is bound to be alot of non performing loans. Several articles, blogs have written on this hidden problem which will soon come to light
May 30, 2008 at 11:09 AM #214214ParticipantRegional banks moved to commercial real estate loans after about 1995 and they keep these on their books. As retail and office vacancy rates rise there is bound to be alot of non performing loans. Several articles, blogs have written on this hidden problem which will soon come to light
May 30, 2008 at 11:09 AM #214237ParticipantRegional banks moved to commercial real estate loans after about 1995 and they keep these on their books. As retail and office vacancy rates rise there is bound to be alot of non performing loans. Several articles, blogs have written on this hidden problem which will soon come to light
May 30, 2008 at 11:09 AM #214263ParticipantRegional banks moved to commercial real estate loans after about 1995 and they keep these on their books. As retail and office vacancy rates rise there is bound to be alot of non performing loans. Several articles, blogs have written on this hidden problem which will soon come to light
May 30, 2008 at 11:09 AM #214294ParticipantRegional banks moved to commercial real estate loans after about 1995 and they keep these on their books. As retail and office vacancy rates rise there is bound to be alot of non performing loans. Several articles, blogs have written on this hidden problem which will soon come to light
May 30, 2008 at 2:06 PM #214365sdrealtor
ParticipantI’m beginning to think JWM=ex-sd. Whenever one posts, the other steps forward shortly thereafter with a pat on the back for finding such a great article. C’mon guys (or guy) bring some thoughtful analysis for change.
As a step further, I’d venture that its possible JWM = ex-sd = PS
May 30, 2008 at 2:06 PM #214441ParticipantI’m beginning to think JWM=ex-sd. Whenever one posts, the other steps forward shortly thereafter with a pat on the back for finding such a great article. C’mon guys (or guy) bring some thoughtful analysis for change.
As a step further, I’d venture that its possible JWM = ex-sd = PS
May 30, 2008 at 2:06 PM #214467ParticipantI’m beginning to think JWM=ex-sd. Whenever one posts, the other steps forward shortly thereafter with a pat on the back for finding such a great article. C’mon guys (or guy) bring some thoughtful analysis for change.
As a step further, I’d venture that its possible JWM = ex-sd = PS
May 30, 2008 at 2:06 PM #214493ParticipantI’m beginning to think JWM=ex-sd. Whenever one posts, the other steps forward shortly thereafter with a pat on the back for finding such a great article. C’mon guys (or guy) bring some thoughtful analysis for change.
As a step further, I’d venture that its possible JWM = ex-sd = PS
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.