Underwater Homeowners Thread

[ra633]

As I stated in the OP, I think that Underwater Homeowners should go for it, ie. walk. This is one way to counter the ridiculous housing bailout plan that is out there.

The government should not be trying to set a floor for the housing market, Prices need to drop further, especially in places like downtown SD where I live.

Interest rates should not be so low either.

These moves are just prolonging this recession.

As I predicted on 2/13/2009, the Obama Administration did not figure out how to solve the housing crisis.

To the Underwater Homeowners out there that replied to the original post – sorry to not reply and support you, because I do. I was away from this board for a few days…

[CDMA ENG]

[quote=paramount]Breeze: You have absolutely no idea what your talking about – NONE.

I go to work in the dark and come home in the dark at least 5 days a week you %$#!.

My mortgage payment is paid in advance, I have NEVER been late on any debt and never defaulted on any debt in my life you %#$^.

Praise be to God.

[/quote]

Paramont,

While I disagree with your approach/opinion about this. Please bear in mind that you shouldnt be offended by The Breeze. He is a arrogant ass and loves to play the inconistent Troll on these threads.

Good luck to you sir.

CE

[CDMA ENG]

[quote=paramount]Breeze: You have absolutely no idea what your talking about – NONE.

I go to work in the dark and come home in the dark at least 5 days a week you %$#!.

My mortgage payment is paid in advance, I have NEVER been late on any debt and never defaulted on any debt in my life you %#$^.

Praise be to God.

[/quote]

Paramont,

While I disagree with your approach/opinion about this. Please bear in mind that you shouldnt be offended by The Breeze. He is a arrogant ass and loves to play the inconistent Troll on these threads.

Good luck to you sir.

CE

[CDMA ENG]

[quote=paramount]Breeze: You have absolutely no idea what your talking about – NONE.

I go to work in the dark and come home in the dark at least 5 days a week you %$#!.

My mortgage payment is paid in advance, I have NEVER been late on any debt and never defaulted on any debt in my life you %#$^.

Praise be to God.

[/quote]

Paramont,

While I disagree with your approach/opinion about this. Please bear in mind that you shouldnt be offended by The Breeze. He is a arrogant ass and loves to play the inconistent Troll on these threads.

Good luck to you sir.

CE

[CDMA ENG]

[quote=paramount]Breeze: You have absolutely no idea what your talking about – NONE.

I go to work in the dark and come home in the dark at least 5 days a week you %$#!.

My mortgage payment is paid in advance, I have NEVER been late on any debt and never defaulted on any debt in my life you %#$^.

Praise be to God.

[/quote]

Paramont,

While I disagree with your approach/opinion about this. Please bear in mind that you shouldnt be offended by The Breeze. He is a arrogant ass and loves to play the inconistent Troll on these threads.

Good luck to you sir.

CE

[CDMA ENG]

[quote=paramount]Breeze: You have absolutely no idea what your talking about – NONE.

I go to work in the dark and come home in the dark at least 5 days a week you %$#!.

My mortgage payment is paid in advance, I have NEVER been late on any debt and never defaulted on any debt in my life you %#$^.

Praise be to God.

[/quote]

Paramont,

While I disagree with your approach/opinion about this. Please bear in mind that you shouldnt be offended by The Breeze. He is a arrogant ass and loves to play the inconistent Troll on these threads.

Good luck to you sir.

CE

[CDMA ENG]

[quote=TheBreeze][quote=CDMA ENG]

Breeze, are you serious? Many, and I may even say most, would say the same thing about you. You have not act with the utmost of integretity on this site so point some of that high power preception at your self.

CE
[/quote]

What the hell are you talking about? When have I asked for advice on this site? And if I did ask for advice, and I ignored it, and it ended up costing me money, do you see me begging for a bailout?

Hell no! I made my decisions and I suffer/gain from the consequences. That’s what people with integrity do.
[/quote]

If you don’t know how you have acted without integrity than is something that can not be explained to you.

Just your own posts are the evidence against you. Your easy name calling, especially for people who disagree with you, is unappetizing.

Just let the free flow of opinions accure without your disrespectful approach.

I dont agree with Paramounts approach either but I repect that fact that he even posted, KNOWING WELL, that there would be people with oppsite opinions. Thats what this forum is about.

So some respect for others.

CE

[CDMA ENG]

[quote=TheBreeze][quote=CDMA ENG]

Breeze, are you serious? Many, and I may even say most, would say the same thing about you. You have not act with the utmost of integretity on this site so point some of that high power preception at your self.

CE
[/quote]

What the hell are you talking about? When have I asked for advice on this site? And if I did ask for advice, and I ignored it, and it ended up costing me money, do you see me begging for a bailout?

Hell no! I made my decisions and I suffer/gain from the consequences. That’s what people with integrity do.
[/quote]

If you don’t know how you have acted without integrity than is something that can not be explained to you.

Just your own posts are the evidence against you. Your easy name calling, especially for people who disagree with you, is unappetizing.

Just let the free flow of opinions accure without your disrespectful approach.

I dont agree with Paramounts approach either but I repect that fact that he even posted, KNOWING WELL, that there would be people with oppsite opinions. Thats what this forum is about.

So some respect for others.

CE

[CDMA ENG]

[quote=TheBreeze][quote=CDMA ENG]

Breeze, are you serious? Many, and I may even say most, would say the same thing about you. You have not act with the utmost of integretity on this site so point some of that high power preception at your self.

CE
[/quote]

What the hell are you talking about? When have I asked for advice on this site? And if I did ask for advice, and I ignored it, and it ended up costing me money, do you see me begging for a bailout?

Hell no! I made my decisions and I suffer/gain from the consequences. That’s what people with integrity do.
[/quote]

If you don’t know how you have acted without integrity than is something that can not be explained to you.

Just your own posts are the evidence against you. Your easy name calling, especially for people who disagree with you, is unappetizing.

Just let the free flow of opinions accure without your disrespectful approach.

I dont agree with Paramounts approach either but I repect that fact that he even posted, KNOWING WELL, that there would be people with oppsite opinions. Thats what this forum is about.

So some respect for others.

CE

[CDMA ENG]

[quote=TheBreeze][quote=CDMA ENG]

Breeze, are you serious? Many, and I may even say most, would say the same thing about you. You have not act with the utmost of integretity on this site so point some of that high power preception at your self.

CE
[/quote]

What the hell are you talking about? When have I asked for advice on this site? And if I did ask for advice, and I ignored it, and it ended up costing me money, do you see me begging for a bailout?

Hell no! I made my decisions and I suffer/gain from the consequences. That’s what people with integrity do.
[/quote]

If you don’t know how you have acted without integrity than is something that can not be explained to you.

Just your own posts are the evidence against you. Your easy name calling, especially for people who disagree with you, is unappetizing.

Just let the free flow of opinions accure without your disrespectful approach.

I dont agree with Paramounts approach either but I repect that fact that he even posted, KNOWING WELL, that there would be people with oppsite opinions. Thats what this forum is about.

So some respect for others.

CE

[CDMA ENG]

[quote=TheBreeze][quote=CDMA ENG]

Breeze, are you serious? Many, and I may even say most, would say the same thing about you. You have not act with the utmost of integretity on this site so point some of that high power preception at your self.

CE
[/quote]

What the hell are you talking about? When have I asked for advice on this site? And if I did ask for advice, and I ignored it, and it ended up costing me money, do you see me begging for a bailout?

Hell no! I made my decisions and I suffer/gain from the consequences. That’s what people with integrity do.
[/quote]

If you don’t know how you have acted without integrity than is something that can not be explained to you.

Just your own posts are the evidence against you. Your easy name calling, especially for people who disagree with you, is unappetizing.

Just let the free flow of opinions accure without your disrespectful approach.

I dont agree with Paramounts approach either but I repect that fact that he even posted, KNOWING WELL, that there would be people with oppsite opinions. Thats what this forum is about.

So some respect for others.

CE

[patientrenter]

[quote=paramount]Like RL said today, there are 2 groups of people in all of this:

1. Those who largely committed fraud buying a house they could not afford, and

2. The victims of this fraud – primarily those who are severely upside down among others.

[/quote]

So, if you are a homebuyer who did not commit fraud when buying your home, you are a victim?

Aren’t you forgetting all the people who wanted a nice place to live, but didn’t have enough money of their own to pay for it, and wanted to get some free spending money from future home price appreciation?

Are you saying that those people – who wanted a free lunch paid for with other people’s money – are victims because they didn’t get the free lunch? And they deserve some free lunch now to limit their disappointment and help meet their original expectations?

[patientrenter]

[quote=paramount]Like RL said today, there are 2 groups of people in all of this:

1. Those who largely committed fraud buying a house they could not afford, and

2. The victims of this fraud – primarily those who are severely upside down among others.

[/quote]

So, if you are a homebuyer who did not commit fraud when buying your home, you are a victim?

Aren’t you forgetting all the people who wanted a nice place to live, but didn’t have enough money of their own to pay for it, and wanted to get some free spending money from future home price appreciation?

Are you saying that those people – who wanted a free lunch paid for with other people’s money – are victims because they didn’t get the free lunch? And they deserve some free lunch now to limit their disappointment and help meet their original expectations?

[patientrenter]

[quote=paramount]Like RL said today, there are 2 groups of people in all of this:

1. Those who largely committed fraud buying a house they could not afford, and

2. The victims of this fraud – primarily those who are severely upside down among others.

[/quote]

So, if you are a homebuyer who did not commit fraud when buying your home, you are a victim?

Aren’t you forgetting all the people who wanted a nice place to live, but didn’t have enough money of their own to pay for it, and wanted to get some free spending money from future home price appreciation?

Are you saying that those people – who wanted a free lunch paid for with other people’s money – are victims because they didn’t get the free lunch? And they deserve some free lunch now to limit their disappointment and help meet their original expectations?

[patientrenter]

[quote=paramount]Like RL said today, there are 2 groups of people in all of this:

1. Those who largely committed fraud buying a house they could not afford, and

2. The victims of this fraud – primarily those who are severely upside down among others.

[/quote]

So, if you are a homebuyer who did not commit fraud when buying your home, you are a victim?

Aren’t you forgetting all the people who wanted a nice place to live, but didn’t have enough money of their own to pay for it, and wanted to get some free spending money from future home price appreciation?

Are you saying that those people – who wanted a free lunch paid for with other people’s money – are victims because they didn’t get the free lunch? And they deserve some free lunch now to limit their disappointment and help meet their original expectations?

[Author]

Posts