Threadjackers Will Be Persecuted (Maybe Even Prosecuted)

[Rich Toscano]

[quote=briansd1]
I just think that partisan attacks deserve responses.
[/quote]

Since the whole issue here is STARTING political flamewars, this is meaningless and/or a mischaracterization.

But whatever. The guidelines should be clear now.

[jpinpb]

[quote=briansd1]
That’s because, before I started posting, and before I started responding in kind, the other side had no opposition.
[/quote]

Speaking for myself, brian has a point. I prefer not to engage in political arguments, even though I don’t agree w/some posts and would oppose what’s said, I would not post anything. brian has taken on to be the voice of some who do not respond.

[jpinpb]

[quote=briansd1]
That’s because, before I started posting, and before I started responding in kind, the other side had no opposition.
[/quote]

Speaking for myself, brian has a point. I prefer not to engage in political arguments, even though I don’t agree w/some posts and would oppose what’s said, I would not post anything. brian has taken on to be the voice of some who do not respond.

[jpinpb]

[quote=briansd1]
That’s because, before I started posting, and before I started responding in kind, the other side had no opposition.
[/quote]

Speaking for myself, brian has a point. I prefer not to engage in political arguments, even though I don’t agree w/some posts and would oppose what’s said, I would not post anything. brian has taken on to be the voice of some who do not respond.

[jpinpb]

[quote=briansd1]
That’s because, before I started posting, and before I started responding in kind, the other side had no opposition.
[/quote]

Speaking for myself, brian has a point. I prefer not to engage in political arguments, even though I don’t agree w/some posts and would oppose what’s said, I would not post anything. brian has taken on to be the voice of some who do not respond.

[jpinpb]

[quote=briansd1]
That’s because, before I started posting, and before I started responding in kind, the other side had no opposition.
[/quote]

Speaking for myself, brian has a point. I prefer not to engage in political arguments, even though I don’t agree w/some posts and would oppose what’s said, I would not post anything. brian has taken on to be the voice of some who do not respond.

[Anonymous]

Does the ban extend to creepy Internet stalkers who continuously bring up your Internet handle in threads which you have nothing to do with? That’s pretty antagonistic, no?

[Anonymous]

Does the ban extend to creepy Internet stalkers who continuously bring up your Internet handle in threads which you have nothing to do with? That’s pretty antagonistic, no?

[Anonymous]

Does the ban extend to creepy Internet stalkers who continuously bring up your Internet handle in threads which you have nothing to do with? That’s pretty antagonistic, no?

[Anonymous]

Does the ban extend to creepy Internet stalkers who continuously bring up your Internet handle in threads which you have nothing to do with? That’s pretty antagonistic, no?

[Anonymous]

Does the ban extend to creepy Internet stalkers who continuously bring up your Internet handle in threads which you have nothing to do with? That’s pretty antagonistic, no?

[sdduuuude]

[quote=ucodegen]I suspect that he may have just had enough of briansd1 and ‘lost it’. I just prefer not to ‘feed the trolls’.[/quote]

I pointed out that brian had threadjacked the thread and that someone responded with a “troll-feeding” remark. I recommended that either the the post be nuked, or that brian be nuked – per Rich’s earlier comments about bannable offenses.

Rich chose to nuke the comment that I asked to be nuked, as well as the response, as well as my request to nuke it.

So, how, exactly did I ‘lose it’ ?

[sdduuuude]

[quote=ucodegen]I suspect that he may have just had enough of briansd1 and ‘lost it’. I just prefer not to ‘feed the trolls’.[/quote]

I pointed out that brian had threadjacked the thread and that someone responded with a “troll-feeding” remark. I recommended that either the the post be nuked, or that brian be nuked – per Rich’s earlier comments about bannable offenses.

Rich chose to nuke the comment that I asked to be nuked, as well as the response, as well as my request to nuke it.

So, how, exactly did I ‘lose it’ ?

[sdduuuude]

[quote=ucodegen]I suspect that he may have just had enough of briansd1 and ‘lost it’. I just prefer not to ‘feed the trolls’.[/quote]

I pointed out that brian had threadjacked the thread and that someone responded with a “troll-feeding” remark. I recommended that either the the post be nuked, or that brian be nuked – per Rich’s earlier comments about bannable offenses.

Rich chose to nuke the comment that I asked to be nuked, as well as the response, as well as my request to nuke it.

So, how, exactly did I ‘lose it’ ?

[sdduuuude]

[quote=ucodegen]I suspect that he may have just had enough of briansd1 and ‘lost it’. I just prefer not to ‘feed the trolls’.[/quote]

I pointed out that brian had threadjacked the thread and that someone responded with a “troll-feeding” remark. I recommended that either the the post be nuked, or that brian be nuked – per Rich’s earlier comments about bannable offenses.

Rich chose to nuke the comment that I asked to be nuked, as well as the response, as well as my request to nuke it.

So, how, exactly did I ‘lose it’ ?

[Author]

Posts