Threadjackers Will Be Persecuted (Maybe Even Prosecuted)

[sdduuuude]

Sorry brian – I caught that and edited it while you were posting.

It originally said “in favor of brian” then I messed with it and it incorrectly said “in favor of banning brian” – as you quoted it. It reads the way I meant now.

Just note that 49/25 against banning is quite atrocious. Nobody would fare that poorly. The question wasn’t “do you dislike brian” or “do you agree with brian?” or “does brian annoy you a little bit?” it was “should he be banned?” 1/3 think yes.

[Arraya]

[img_assist|nid=13431|title=.|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=524|height=400]

Sorry, couldn’t help it

[Arraya]

[img_assist|nid=13431|title=.|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=524|height=400]

Sorry, couldn’t help it

[Arraya]

[img_assist|nid=13431|title=.|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=524|height=400]

Sorry, couldn’t help it

[Arraya]

[img_assist|nid=13431|title=.|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=524|height=400]

Sorry, couldn’t help it

[Arraya]

[img_assist|nid=13431|title=.|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=524|height=400]

Sorry, couldn’t help it

[Anonymous]

[quote=sdduuuude]Sorry brian – I caught that and edited it while you were posting.

It originally said “in favor of brian” then I messed with it and it incorrectly said “in favor of banning brian” – as you quoted it. It reads the way I meant now.

Just note that 49/25 against banning is quite atrocious. Nobody would fare that poorly. The question wasn’t “do you dislike brian” or “do you agree with brian?” or “does brian annoy you a little bit?” it was “should he be banned?” 1/3 think yes.[/quote]

So you want to ban people if only 1/3 of posters are in favor of it? That’s a bit draconian.

[Anonymous]

[quote=sdduuuude]Sorry brian – I caught that and edited it while you were posting.

It originally said “in favor of brian” then I messed with it and it incorrectly said “in favor of banning brian” – as you quoted it. It reads the way I meant now.

Just note that 49/25 against banning is quite atrocious. Nobody would fare that poorly. The question wasn’t “do you dislike brian” or “do you agree with brian?” or “does brian annoy you a little bit?” it was “should he be banned?” 1/3 think yes.[/quote]

So you want to ban people if only 1/3 of posters are in favor of it? That’s a bit draconian.

[Anonymous]

[quote=sdduuuude]Sorry brian – I caught that and edited it while you were posting.

It originally said “in favor of brian” then I messed with it and it incorrectly said “in favor of banning brian” – as you quoted it. It reads the way I meant now.

Just note that 49/25 against banning is quite atrocious. Nobody would fare that poorly. The question wasn’t “do you dislike brian” or “do you agree with brian?” or “does brian annoy you a little bit?” it was “should he be banned?” 1/3 think yes.[/quote]

So you want to ban people if only 1/3 of posters are in favor of it? That’s a bit draconian.

[Anonymous]

[quote=sdduuuude]Sorry brian – I caught that and edited it while you were posting.

It originally said “in favor of brian” then I messed with it and it incorrectly said “in favor of banning brian” – as you quoted it. It reads the way I meant now.

Just note that 49/25 against banning is quite atrocious. Nobody would fare that poorly. The question wasn’t “do you dislike brian” or “do you agree with brian?” or “does brian annoy you a little bit?” it was “should he be banned?” 1/3 think yes.[/quote]

So you want to ban people if only 1/3 of posters are in favor of it? That’s a bit draconian.

[Anonymous]

[quote=sdduuuude]Sorry brian – I caught that and edited it while you were posting.

It originally said “in favor of brian” then I messed with it and it incorrectly said “in favor of banning brian” – as you quoted it. It reads the way I meant now.

Just note that 49/25 against banning is quite atrocious. Nobody would fare that poorly. The question wasn’t “do you dislike brian” or “do you agree with brian?” or “does brian annoy you a little bit?” it was “should he be banned?” 1/3 think yes.[/quote]

So you want to ban people if only 1/3 of posters are in favor of it? That’s a bit draconian.

[Anonymous]

If you want to stop the political posts, all you have to do is remove the OT posts from the ‘Active forum topics’ section on the right. I predict political posts would dry up right quick if you did that.

[Anonymous]

If you want to stop the political posts, all you have to do is remove the OT posts from the ‘Active forum topics’ section on the right. I predict political posts would dry up right quick if you did that.

[Anonymous]

If you want to stop the political posts, all you have to do is remove the OT posts from the ‘Active forum topics’ section on the right. I predict political posts would dry up right quick if you did that.

[Anonymous]

If you want to stop the political posts, all you have to do is remove the OT posts from the ‘Active forum topics’ section on the right. I predict political posts would dry up right quick if you did that.

[Author]

Posts