Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › This is a great time to be in banking – Warren Buffett – 3 Billion in earnings for Q1 2009
- This topic has 45 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 1 month ago by BGinRB.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 10, 2009 at 12:38 PM #379502April 10, 2009 at 12:50 PM #378891patbParticipant
[quote=Navydoc]Is it me, or doesn’t it seem particularly suspicious that Wells Fargo is reporting high earnings immediately after Mark-to-Market was suspended? I’m certainly not a financial wizard, but this sure smells like smoke and mirrors to me. Didn’t WFC buy up all of Wachoia’s crap mortgages?
[/quote]
DINGDINGDINGDING we have a winner.
M2M suspends and they have huge earnings.
If they were Mrking to market their credit card debt and their
CRE, they would be drowning in red ink.April 10, 2009 at 12:50 PM #379166patbParticipant[quote=Navydoc]Is it me, or doesn’t it seem particularly suspicious that Wells Fargo is reporting high earnings immediately after Mark-to-Market was suspended? I’m certainly not a financial wizard, but this sure smells like smoke and mirrors to me. Didn’t WFC buy up all of Wachoia’s crap mortgages?
[/quote]
DINGDINGDINGDING we have a winner.
M2M suspends and they have huge earnings.
If they were Mrking to market their credit card debt and their
CRE, they would be drowning in red ink.April 10, 2009 at 12:50 PM #379348patbParticipant[quote=Navydoc]Is it me, or doesn’t it seem particularly suspicious that Wells Fargo is reporting high earnings immediately after Mark-to-Market was suspended? I’m certainly not a financial wizard, but this sure smells like smoke and mirrors to me. Didn’t WFC buy up all of Wachoia’s crap mortgages?
[/quote]
DINGDINGDINGDING we have a winner.
M2M suspends and they have huge earnings.
If they were Mrking to market their credit card debt and their
CRE, they would be drowning in red ink.April 10, 2009 at 12:50 PM #379390patbParticipant[quote=Navydoc]Is it me, or doesn’t it seem particularly suspicious that Wells Fargo is reporting high earnings immediately after Mark-to-Market was suspended? I’m certainly not a financial wizard, but this sure smells like smoke and mirrors to me. Didn’t WFC buy up all of Wachoia’s crap mortgages?
[/quote]
DINGDINGDINGDING we have a winner.
M2M suspends and they have huge earnings.
If they were Mrking to market their credit card debt and their
CRE, they would be drowning in red ink.April 10, 2009 at 12:50 PM #379517patbParticipant[quote=Navydoc]Is it me, or doesn’t it seem particularly suspicious that Wells Fargo is reporting high earnings immediately after Mark-to-Market was suspended? I’m certainly not a financial wizard, but this sure smells like smoke and mirrors to me. Didn’t WFC buy up all of Wachoia’s crap mortgages?
[/quote]
DINGDINGDINGDING we have a winner.
M2M suspends and they have huge earnings.
If they were Mrking to market their credit card debt and their
CRE, they would be drowning in red ink.April 10, 2009 at 1:14 PM #378901daveljParticipant[quote=Rockemsock]Buffet WFC value:
Jan. 1 = 8.7 billion
Apr. 1 = 3.9 billion
Apr. 9 = 5.2 billionYear to date…i’d say Mr. Buffet has lost about 3.5 billion worth of WFC. Are we supposed to be congratulating him or something?
[/quote]
Buffett’s history with financial stocks is horrific. He’s right about margins expanding. And he’s right that it’s a great time to be in banking IF YOU DON’T HAVE A BOATLOAD OF LEGACY CRAP IN YOUR LOAN PORTFOLIO (which WFC does). Other than that, his comments are noise.
April 10, 2009 at 1:14 PM #379176daveljParticipant[quote=Rockemsock]Buffet WFC value:
Jan. 1 = 8.7 billion
Apr. 1 = 3.9 billion
Apr. 9 = 5.2 billionYear to date…i’d say Mr. Buffet has lost about 3.5 billion worth of WFC. Are we supposed to be congratulating him or something?
[/quote]
Buffett’s history with financial stocks is horrific. He’s right about margins expanding. And he’s right that it’s a great time to be in banking IF YOU DON’T HAVE A BOATLOAD OF LEGACY CRAP IN YOUR LOAN PORTFOLIO (which WFC does). Other than that, his comments are noise.
April 10, 2009 at 1:14 PM #379358daveljParticipant[quote=Rockemsock]Buffet WFC value:
Jan. 1 = 8.7 billion
Apr. 1 = 3.9 billion
Apr. 9 = 5.2 billionYear to date…i’d say Mr. Buffet has lost about 3.5 billion worth of WFC. Are we supposed to be congratulating him or something?
[/quote]
Buffett’s history with financial stocks is horrific. He’s right about margins expanding. And he’s right that it’s a great time to be in banking IF YOU DON’T HAVE A BOATLOAD OF LEGACY CRAP IN YOUR LOAN PORTFOLIO (which WFC does). Other than that, his comments are noise.
April 10, 2009 at 1:14 PM #379400daveljParticipant[quote=Rockemsock]Buffet WFC value:
Jan. 1 = 8.7 billion
Apr. 1 = 3.9 billion
Apr. 9 = 5.2 billionYear to date…i’d say Mr. Buffet has lost about 3.5 billion worth of WFC. Are we supposed to be congratulating him or something?
[/quote]
Buffett’s history with financial stocks is horrific. He’s right about margins expanding. And he’s right that it’s a great time to be in banking IF YOU DON’T HAVE A BOATLOAD OF LEGACY CRAP IN YOUR LOAN PORTFOLIO (which WFC does). Other than that, his comments are noise.
April 10, 2009 at 1:14 PM #379527daveljParticipant[quote=Rockemsock]Buffet WFC value:
Jan. 1 = 8.7 billion
Apr. 1 = 3.9 billion
Apr. 9 = 5.2 billionYear to date…i’d say Mr. Buffet has lost about 3.5 billion worth of WFC. Are we supposed to be congratulating him or something?
[/quote]
Buffett’s history with financial stocks is horrific. He’s right about margins expanding. And he’s right that it’s a great time to be in banking IF YOU DON’T HAVE A BOATLOAD OF LEGACY CRAP IN YOUR LOAN PORTFOLIO (which WFC does). Other than that, his comments are noise.
April 10, 2009 at 1:23 PM #378911BGinRBParticipantBtw, significant ‘selling on strength’ action with GS (the other major Warren’s financial) and financials in general on Thursday.
GS’ block trades came in very late in the day.April 10, 2009 at 1:23 PM #379186BGinRBParticipantBtw, significant ‘selling on strength’ action with GS (the other major Warren’s financial) and financials in general on Thursday.
GS’ block trades came in very late in the day.April 10, 2009 at 1:23 PM #379368BGinRBParticipantBtw, significant ‘selling on strength’ action with GS (the other major Warren’s financial) and financials in general on Thursday.
GS’ block trades came in very late in the day.April 10, 2009 at 1:23 PM #379410BGinRBParticipantBtw, significant ‘selling on strength’ action with GS (the other major Warren’s financial) and financials in general on Thursday.
GS’ block trades came in very late in the day. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.