Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › The War on Savers….is there any doubt anymore?
- This topic has 22 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 7 months ago by JWM in SD.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 21, 2007 at 9:54 AM #85427September 21, 2007 at 10:03 AM #85432LA_RenterParticipant
I am thoroughly confused as everyone else. Does anybody think rather than focusing on inflation which the markets are currently screaming at us, the FED is actually concerned about deflation starting in 2008 into 2009. The credit bubble that just popped was to say the least gargantuan, the largest bubble in history, global in scope. The housing bubbles are now popping in the 30 to 40 countries where they existed, the run on Northern Rock in the UK was a defining moment in their housing bubble which is actually bigger than the USA’s. Greenspan recently went across the pond and told their central banks that they are basically f*&ked and should rethink further tightening. Once those economies begin to feel the negative impact of the housing bust the global economy will slow muting inflation and easing pressure on the dollar. The 50 bps cut won’t be felt in the economy until next year, right when the full effects of the popping global credit bubble will be felt around the globe. A large global credit contraction precedes a large consumer spending contraction. Thus the FED decision to lower the hammer in the Fed Funds rate. They know the front end will be volatile with the dollar getting hammered and oil and commodities going higher but they see the magnitude of the slowdown coming our way and are gambling that will mute inflation. Ben indicated the Great Depression could have been avoided if more liquidity had been available in the system. I am not saying this is right or wrong and there are plenty of holes here. I am just trying to make sense of the move our FED made that on the surface seems idiotic.
September 21, 2007 at 10:33 AM #85442JWM in SDParticipantNice post LA Renter. I think there may be some merit to your theory about the delayed effect of the cut so as to get in front of the curve on Deflation. I’ve considered this myself, but like you said, it’s confusing and frigtening that we got to this point at all.
I think there are really two camps of thought on this:
One => Increase rates and tighten immediately and then let the cards fall where they may.
Two => Decrease rate and provide liquidity risking the USD until the deflate effects are more obvious.
This is Bernanke’s Box as best as I can describe it. Mish Shedlock predicted this about 18 mos ago. I should have been better prepared 🙁
September 21, 2007 at 10:34 AM #85441(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantThey know the front end will be volatile with the dollar getting hammered and oil and commodities going higher but they see the magnitude of the slowdown coming our way and are gambling that will mute inflation. Ben indicated the Great Depression could have been avoided if more liquidity had been available in the system. I am not saying this is right or wrong and there are plenty of holes here. I am just trying to make sense of the move our FED made that on the surface seems idiotic.
Regarding the FED’s move … In my opinion, it’s actually quite simple and obvious. When the economy starts sucking, the FED lowers rates. This is what they do. The dollar declines if our cycle is ahead of the rest of the world.
When the rest of the world’s economies start sucking, their central banks will cut rates, too.
When the US recovers the dollar will recover. It’s happened before.
Regarding the dollar … It sank in the late 80’s to early 90’s as well. Starting from a dollar index of 124 in 1986 and declining to 80 in September 1992, as the US started recovering from recession.
The dollar went through a couple smaller cycles and peaked again around 120 in early 2002, dropping to 81 at the end of 2004 and is about 79 today.
So the dollar declined to about 65% of it’s 1986 value by 1992, only to return to within ~5% it’s previous peak by 2002. Currently in a drop to about 66% of its recent peak.
I know things are different this time, but they were different last time, too.
Extrapolating the current trend of the dollar and coming to the conclusion that it’s a one-way trip is the same mentality that led some to conclude that real estate prices go up forever.
September 21, 2007 at 10:36 AM #85443surveyorParticipantFWIW
CNN had a story on how some small business and corporations are selling more product overseas because of the weak dollar, narrowing the trade gap. So it’s not all bad.
September 21, 2007 at 10:40 AM #85446HereWeGoParticipantI can’t possibly go long at this time (except maybe energy and commodities), but I don’t have enough confidence to go short.
That said, I can’t shake the feeling that current market entrants are buying into the maw of a serious slowdown, perhaps even a recession.
It’s true that exports are up, obviously imports will fall with the weaker dollar, but it’s also true that domestic profits are really starting to sag.
September 21, 2007 at 10:46 AM #85448lnilesParticipantIf homebuyers default on their loans in great numbers, banks will collapse in great numbers. If banks collapse in great numbers, we are in another great depression and that’s what the fed is scared of. This bailout is of the banks, not of the homebuyers. I think it’s simple and obvious.
September 21, 2007 at 10:46 AM #85449JWM in SDParticipant“I can’t possibly go long at this time (except maybe energy and commodities), but I don’t have enough confidence to go short.
That said, I can’t shake the feeling that current market entrants are buying into the maw of a serious slowdown, perhaps even a recession.
It’s true that exports are up, obviously imports will fall with the weaker dollar, but it’s also true that domestic profits are really starting to sag.”
Agreed.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.