- This topic has 30 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 16 years ago by
nostradamus.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 16, 2008 at 1:55 PM #206157May 16, 2008 at 2:00 PM #206033
nostradamus
ParticipantI and many I know of run processor-intensive engineering applications on AMD-Opteron machines. I think a very cost-efficient platform is to have windows machines vnc or citrixed in to linux servers where you can submit batch jobs to AMD-Opteron machines… I guess I’m biased and the impact on sales due to this methodology is low.
May 16, 2008 at 2:00 PM #206082ParticipantI and many I know of run processor-intensive engineering applications on AMD-Opteron machines. I think a very cost-efficient platform is to have windows machines vnc or citrixed in to linux servers where you can submit batch jobs to AMD-Opteron machines… I guess I’m biased and the impact on sales due to this methodology is low.
May 16, 2008 at 2:00 PM #206114ParticipantI and many I know of run processor-intensive engineering applications on AMD-Opteron machines. I think a very cost-efficient platform is to have windows machines vnc or citrixed in to linux servers where you can submit batch jobs to AMD-Opteron machines… I guess I’m biased and the impact on sales due to this methodology is low.
May 16, 2008 at 2:00 PM #206141ParticipantI and many I know of run processor-intensive engineering applications on AMD-Opteron machines. I think a very cost-efficient platform is to have windows machines vnc or citrixed in to linux servers where you can submit batch jobs to AMD-Opteron machines… I guess I’m biased and the impact on sales due to this methodology is low.
May 16, 2008 at 2:00 PM #206170ParticipantI and many I know of run processor-intensive engineering applications on AMD-Opteron machines. I think a very cost-efficient platform is to have windows machines vnc or citrixed in to linux servers where you can submit batch jobs to AMD-Opteron machines… I guess I’m biased and the impact on sales due to this methodology is low.
May 16, 2008 at 2:15 PM #206058an
ParticipantI’ve been an AMD fan since the 486 days. However, recently, I’ve switched to the Core 2 Duo. Ever since the Athlon first came out, it killed Intel in raw power as well as running cooler and at a slower speed. However, unlike Intel, they don’t have the capability to run multiple design concurrently. So they decide to focus on server side, which is where most of the profit is. The Opteron are still very competitive if not dominating. However, they’ve fallen out of grace w/ the gamers and enthusiast ever since the Core 2 Duo came on the market. This has cost them dearly in market share.
May 16, 2008 at 2:15 PM #206108ParticipantI’ve been an AMD fan since the 486 days. However, recently, I’ve switched to the Core 2 Duo. Ever since the Athlon first came out, it killed Intel in raw power as well as running cooler and at a slower speed. However, unlike Intel, they don’t have the capability to run multiple design concurrently. So they decide to focus on server side, which is where most of the profit is. The Opteron are still very competitive if not dominating. However, they’ve fallen out of grace w/ the gamers and enthusiast ever since the Core 2 Duo came on the market. This has cost them dearly in market share.
May 16, 2008 at 2:15 PM #206140ParticipantI’ve been an AMD fan since the 486 days. However, recently, I’ve switched to the Core 2 Duo. Ever since the Athlon first came out, it killed Intel in raw power as well as running cooler and at a slower speed. However, unlike Intel, they don’t have the capability to run multiple design concurrently. So they decide to focus on server side, which is where most of the profit is. The Opteron are still very competitive if not dominating. However, they’ve fallen out of grace w/ the gamers and enthusiast ever since the Core 2 Duo came on the market. This has cost them dearly in market share.
May 16, 2008 at 2:15 PM #206166ParticipantI’ve been an AMD fan since the 486 days. However, recently, I’ve switched to the Core 2 Duo. Ever since the Athlon first came out, it killed Intel in raw power as well as running cooler and at a slower speed. However, unlike Intel, they don’t have the capability to run multiple design concurrently. So they decide to focus on server side, which is where most of the profit is. The Opteron are still very competitive if not dominating. However, they’ve fallen out of grace w/ the gamers and enthusiast ever since the Core 2 Duo came on the market. This has cost them dearly in market share.
May 16, 2008 at 2:15 PM #206194ParticipantI’ve been an AMD fan since the 486 days. However, recently, I’ve switched to the Core 2 Duo. Ever since the Athlon first came out, it killed Intel in raw power as well as running cooler and at a slower speed. However, unlike Intel, they don’t have the capability to run multiple design concurrently. So they decide to focus on server side, which is where most of the profit is. The Opteron are still very competitive if not dominating. However, they’ve fallen out of grace w/ the gamers and enthusiast ever since the Core 2 Duo came on the market. This has cost them dearly in market share.
May 16, 2008 at 2:18 PM #206068ParticipantGood to know. The gaming market is BIG.
May 16, 2008 at 2:18 PM #206119ParticipantGood to know. The gaming market is BIG.
May 16, 2008 at 2:18 PM #206149ParticipantGood to know. The gaming market is BIG.
May 16, 2008 at 2:18 PM #206176ParticipantGood to know. The gaming market is BIG.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.