- This topic has 1,110 replies, 35 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 1 month ago by NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 17, 2010 at 10:11 AM #527682March 17, 2010 at 10:26 AM #526751briansd1Guest
[quote=mydogsarelazy]I read the article this morning and found it well done. One thing that is pointed out is that some observers are surprised that more underwater homeowners haven’t yet walked away.
In the coming years mortgage fatigue will wear down many more people. What this article describes is a trend that is really the beginning of a slow melt.
JS[/quote]
I agree. I said the same thing before when it was sacrilegious to even mention it.
Bankers thought that people would sacrifice everything just to keep the house. It turn out that it’s the opposite. People will pay for their cars, dinners out, movies, cable TV, clothing, etc.. before they pay the house.
It’s a new cultural phenomenon; and I’m sure that sociologists and economists will be studying the implications of mortgage walkaways for years.
March 17, 2010 at 10:26 AM #526883briansd1Guest[quote=mydogsarelazy]I read the article this morning and found it well done. One thing that is pointed out is that some observers are surprised that more underwater homeowners haven’t yet walked away.
In the coming years mortgage fatigue will wear down many more people. What this article describes is a trend that is really the beginning of a slow melt.
JS[/quote]
I agree. I said the same thing before when it was sacrilegious to even mention it.
Bankers thought that people would sacrifice everything just to keep the house. It turn out that it’s the opposite. People will pay for their cars, dinners out, movies, cable TV, clothing, etc.. before they pay the house.
It’s a new cultural phenomenon; and I’m sure that sociologists and economists will be studying the implications of mortgage walkaways for years.
March 17, 2010 at 10:26 AM #527332briansd1Guest[quote=mydogsarelazy]I read the article this morning and found it well done. One thing that is pointed out is that some observers are surprised that more underwater homeowners haven’t yet walked away.
In the coming years mortgage fatigue will wear down many more people. What this article describes is a trend that is really the beginning of a slow melt.
JS[/quote]
I agree. I said the same thing before when it was sacrilegious to even mention it.
Bankers thought that people would sacrifice everything just to keep the house. It turn out that it’s the opposite. People will pay for their cars, dinners out, movies, cable TV, clothing, etc.. before they pay the house.
It’s a new cultural phenomenon; and I’m sure that sociologists and economists will be studying the implications of mortgage walkaways for years.
March 17, 2010 at 10:26 AM #527428briansd1Guest[quote=mydogsarelazy]I read the article this morning and found it well done. One thing that is pointed out is that some observers are surprised that more underwater homeowners haven’t yet walked away.
In the coming years mortgage fatigue will wear down many more people. What this article describes is a trend that is really the beginning of a slow melt.
JS[/quote]
I agree. I said the same thing before when it was sacrilegious to even mention it.
Bankers thought that people would sacrifice everything just to keep the house. It turn out that it’s the opposite. People will pay for their cars, dinners out, movies, cable TV, clothing, etc.. before they pay the house.
It’s a new cultural phenomenon; and I’m sure that sociologists and economists will be studying the implications of mortgage walkaways for years.
March 17, 2010 at 10:26 AM #527687briansd1Guest[quote=mydogsarelazy]I read the article this morning and found it well done. One thing that is pointed out is that some observers are surprised that more underwater homeowners haven’t yet walked away.
In the coming years mortgage fatigue will wear down many more people. What this article describes is a trend that is really the beginning of a slow melt.
JS[/quote]
I agree. I said the same thing before when it was sacrilegious to even mention it.
Bankers thought that people would sacrifice everything just to keep the house. It turn out that it’s the opposite. People will pay for their cars, dinners out, movies, cable TV, clothing, etc.. before they pay the house.
It’s a new cultural phenomenon; and I’m sure that sociologists and economists will be studying the implications of mortgage walkaways for years.
March 17, 2010 at 10:35 AM #5267664plexownerParticipant“duped into an expensive loan”
I second everything davelj said – walk away, don’t walk away, that’s your decision
but don’t insult my intelligence by trying to pretend that someone else is responsible for your stupid financial decisions
March 17, 2010 at 10:35 AM #5268984plexownerParticipant“duped into an expensive loan”
I second everything davelj said – walk away, don’t walk away, that’s your decision
but don’t insult my intelligence by trying to pretend that someone else is responsible for your stupid financial decisions
March 17, 2010 at 10:35 AM #5273474plexownerParticipant“duped into an expensive loan”
I second everything davelj said – walk away, don’t walk away, that’s your decision
but don’t insult my intelligence by trying to pretend that someone else is responsible for your stupid financial decisions
March 17, 2010 at 10:35 AM #5274434plexownerParticipant“duped into an expensive loan”
I second everything davelj said – walk away, don’t walk away, that’s your decision
but don’t insult my intelligence by trying to pretend that someone else is responsible for your stupid financial decisions
March 17, 2010 at 10:35 AM #5277024plexownerParticipant“duped into an expensive loan”
I second everything davelj said – walk away, don’t walk away, that’s your decision
but don’t insult my intelligence by trying to pretend that someone else is responsible for your stupid financial decisions
March 17, 2010 at 11:11 AM #526796UCGalParticipantDave pretty much nailed it for me.
Lots of blame to go around. The strategic defaulters aren’t victims. The folks who took out loans more than they could afford are responsible for their bad decisions. As is the bank that loaned them more than they could afford.
Banks should pay a price for bad underwriting. Folks who walk away (strategically or not) should pay the price of lost down payments, credit score hits, social stigma… Share the blame, share the pain.
March 17, 2010 at 11:11 AM #526928UCGalParticipantDave pretty much nailed it for me.
Lots of blame to go around. The strategic defaulters aren’t victims. The folks who took out loans more than they could afford are responsible for their bad decisions. As is the bank that loaned them more than they could afford.
Banks should pay a price for bad underwriting. Folks who walk away (strategically or not) should pay the price of lost down payments, credit score hits, social stigma… Share the blame, share the pain.
March 17, 2010 at 11:11 AM #527377UCGalParticipantDave pretty much nailed it for me.
Lots of blame to go around. The strategic defaulters aren’t victims. The folks who took out loans more than they could afford are responsible for their bad decisions. As is the bank that loaned them more than they could afford.
Banks should pay a price for bad underwriting. Folks who walk away (strategically or not) should pay the price of lost down payments, credit score hits, social stigma… Share the blame, share the pain.
March 17, 2010 at 11:11 AM #527473UCGalParticipantDave pretty much nailed it for me.
Lots of blame to go around. The strategic defaulters aren’t victims. The folks who took out loans more than they could afford are responsible for their bad decisions. As is the bank that loaned them more than they could afford.
Banks should pay a price for bad underwriting. Folks who walk away (strategically or not) should pay the price of lost down payments, credit score hits, social stigma… Share the blame, share the pain.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.