- This topic has 90 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 2 months ago by DWCAP.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 15, 2009 at 8:30 PM #15066February 15, 2009 at 11:07 PM #347002NotCrankyParticipant
I like your two tier rental theory. Of course there are lots of variables. I actually mentioned the possibility on the Mira Mesa rent thread.
Tenants should have better rights in the case of deposits. It should be in a joint account. That way if the tenant had to take the landlord to small claims the award could be sitting in a bank and the judge could order the release to the tenant or the owner, whoever prevailed.Maybe some new laws would have to be written? I could see where leveraging the hassles of court against the deposit could come into play,probably in favor of the tenant, but as it is, the landlord has too much leverage on the money.
February 15, 2009 at 11:07 PM #347322NotCrankyParticipantI like your two tier rental theory. Of course there are lots of variables. I actually mentioned the possibility on the Mira Mesa rent thread.
Tenants should have better rights in the case of deposits. It should be in a joint account. That way if the tenant had to take the landlord to small claims the award could be sitting in a bank and the judge could order the release to the tenant or the owner, whoever prevailed.Maybe some new laws would have to be written? I could see where leveraging the hassles of court against the deposit could come into play,probably in favor of the tenant, but as it is, the landlord has too much leverage on the money.
February 15, 2009 at 11:07 PM #347437NotCrankyParticipantI like your two tier rental theory. Of course there are lots of variables. I actually mentioned the possibility on the Mira Mesa rent thread.
Tenants should have better rights in the case of deposits. It should be in a joint account. That way if the tenant had to take the landlord to small claims the award could be sitting in a bank and the judge could order the release to the tenant or the owner, whoever prevailed.Maybe some new laws would have to be written? I could see where leveraging the hassles of court against the deposit could come into play,probably in favor of the tenant, but as it is, the landlord has too much leverage on the money.
February 15, 2009 at 11:07 PM #347471NotCrankyParticipantI like your two tier rental theory. Of course there are lots of variables. I actually mentioned the possibility on the Mira Mesa rent thread.
Tenants should have better rights in the case of deposits. It should be in a joint account. That way if the tenant had to take the landlord to small claims the award could be sitting in a bank and the judge could order the release to the tenant or the owner, whoever prevailed.Maybe some new laws would have to be written? I could see where leveraging the hassles of court against the deposit could come into play,probably in favor of the tenant, but as it is, the landlord has too much leverage on the money.
February 15, 2009 at 11:07 PM #347569NotCrankyParticipantI like your two tier rental theory. Of course there are lots of variables. I actually mentioned the possibility on the Mira Mesa rent thread.
Tenants should have better rights in the case of deposits. It should be in a joint account. That way if the tenant had to take the landlord to small claims the award could be sitting in a bank and the judge could order the release to the tenant or the owner, whoever prevailed.Maybe some new laws would have to be written? I could see where leveraging the hassles of court against the deposit could come into play,probably in favor of the tenant, but as it is, the landlord has too much leverage on the money.
February 16, 2009 at 6:09 AM #347077EconProfParticipantAs your situation evolves, documentation is everything. Rely only on what is in writing, communicate from now on by mail or (saved) emails, and develop a paper trail.
You cannot unilaterally alter existing contracts and laws, such as trying to get your security deposit back before the 3-week maximum called for by CA law.
You can put every complaint or proposal in writing and ask that they reply in kind. The very fact that they know you are savvy and documenting everything will help keep them honest.
You should immediately reread carefully your existing contract and any related papers so you are fully informed of your current rights and obligations.February 16, 2009 at 6:09 AM #347397EconProfParticipantAs your situation evolves, documentation is everything. Rely only on what is in writing, communicate from now on by mail or (saved) emails, and develop a paper trail.
You cannot unilaterally alter existing contracts and laws, such as trying to get your security deposit back before the 3-week maximum called for by CA law.
You can put every complaint or proposal in writing and ask that they reply in kind. The very fact that they know you are savvy and documenting everything will help keep them honest.
You should immediately reread carefully your existing contract and any related papers so you are fully informed of your current rights and obligations.February 16, 2009 at 6:09 AM #347512EconProfParticipantAs your situation evolves, documentation is everything. Rely only on what is in writing, communicate from now on by mail or (saved) emails, and develop a paper trail.
You cannot unilaterally alter existing contracts and laws, such as trying to get your security deposit back before the 3-week maximum called for by CA law.
You can put every complaint or proposal in writing and ask that they reply in kind. The very fact that they know you are savvy and documenting everything will help keep them honest.
You should immediately reread carefully your existing contract and any related papers so you are fully informed of your current rights and obligations.February 16, 2009 at 6:09 AM #347546EconProfParticipantAs your situation evolves, documentation is everything. Rely only on what is in writing, communicate from now on by mail or (saved) emails, and develop a paper trail.
You cannot unilaterally alter existing contracts and laws, such as trying to get your security deposit back before the 3-week maximum called for by CA law.
You can put every complaint or proposal in writing and ask that they reply in kind. The very fact that they know you are savvy and documenting everything will help keep them honest.
You should immediately reread carefully your existing contract and any related papers so you are fully informed of your current rights and obligations.February 16, 2009 at 6:09 AM #347644EconProfParticipantAs your situation evolves, documentation is everything. Rely only on what is in writing, communicate from now on by mail or (saved) emails, and develop a paper trail.
You cannot unilaterally alter existing contracts and laws, such as trying to get your security deposit back before the 3-week maximum called for by CA law.
You can put every complaint or proposal in writing and ask that they reply in kind. The very fact that they know you are savvy and documenting everything will help keep them honest.
You should immediately reread carefully your existing contract and any related papers so you are fully informed of your current rights and obligations.February 16, 2009 at 8:41 AM #347132svelteParticipantLandlords trying to keep the deposit – even when you leave the property in better shape that when you moved in – is nothing new.
It happened to us several times in the 1980s.
I came up with a solution though, and used it several times successfully. When the last month’s rent was due, I wrote the landlord a letter and told them to use the security deposit as the last month’s rent. They weren’t thrilled and they could still take us to court if we had damaged the property, but the places were always spic-n-span when we left so we never had a problem.
It basically turned the tables: they would have to take me to court and defend their deductions of the deposit, as opposed to me having to take them to court to get my deposit back.
February 16, 2009 at 8:41 AM #347452svelteParticipantLandlords trying to keep the deposit – even when you leave the property in better shape that when you moved in – is nothing new.
It happened to us several times in the 1980s.
I came up with a solution though, and used it several times successfully. When the last month’s rent was due, I wrote the landlord a letter and told them to use the security deposit as the last month’s rent. They weren’t thrilled and they could still take us to court if we had damaged the property, but the places were always spic-n-span when we left so we never had a problem.
It basically turned the tables: they would have to take me to court and defend their deductions of the deposit, as opposed to me having to take them to court to get my deposit back.
February 16, 2009 at 8:41 AM #347567svelteParticipantLandlords trying to keep the deposit – even when you leave the property in better shape that when you moved in – is nothing new.
It happened to us several times in the 1980s.
I came up with a solution though, and used it several times successfully. When the last month’s rent was due, I wrote the landlord a letter and told them to use the security deposit as the last month’s rent. They weren’t thrilled and they could still take us to court if we had damaged the property, but the places were always spic-n-span when we left so we never had a problem.
It basically turned the tables: they would have to take me to court and defend their deductions of the deposit, as opposed to me having to take them to court to get my deposit back.
February 16, 2009 at 8:41 AM #347601svelteParticipantLandlords trying to keep the deposit – even when you leave the property in better shape that when you moved in – is nothing new.
It happened to us several times in the 1980s.
I came up with a solution though, and used it several times successfully. When the last month’s rent was due, I wrote the landlord a letter and told them to use the security deposit as the last month’s rent. They weren’t thrilled and they could still take us to court if we had damaged the property, but the places were always spic-n-span when we left so we never had a problem.
It basically turned the tables: they would have to take me to court and defend their deductions of the deposit, as opposed to me having to take them to court to get my deposit back.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.