- This topic has 195 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 10 months ago by
CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 17, 2011 at 3:06 PM #19042August 17, 2011 at 3:32 PM #720482
all
ParticipantI was under impression that all interest used to be deductible. If that is the case the current deduction is really not a subsidy, but money not confiscated by the government. Yet.
And low-income renters do get some breaks like Section 8 and renter’s tax credit in some states (including CA).
August 17, 2011 at 3:32 PM #720575all
ParticipantI was under impression that all interest used to be deductible. If that is the case the current deduction is really not a subsidy, but money not confiscated by the government. Yet.
And low-income renters do get some breaks like Section 8 and renter’s tax credit in some states (including CA).
August 17, 2011 at 3:32 PM #721174all
ParticipantI was under impression that all interest used to be deductible. If that is the case the current deduction is really not a subsidy, but money not confiscated by the government. Yet.
And low-income renters do get some breaks like Section 8 and renter’s tax credit in some states (including CA).
August 17, 2011 at 3:32 PM #721329all
ParticipantI was under impression that all interest used to be deductible. If that is the case the current deduction is really not a subsidy, but money not confiscated by the government. Yet.
And low-income renters do get some breaks like Section 8 and renter’s tax credit in some states (including CA).
August 17, 2011 at 3:32 PM #721694all
ParticipantI was under impression that all interest used to be deductible. If that is the case the current deduction is really not a subsidy, but money not confiscated by the government. Yet.
And low-income renters do get some breaks like Section 8 and renter’s tax credit in some states (including CA).
August 17, 2011 at 3:56 PM #720497Anonymous
GuestOf course this is a subsidy. A homeowner and a renter all else being equal, the renter pays far higher income taxes. That is discrimination pure and simple.
August 17, 2011 at 3:56 PM #720588Anonymous
GuestOf course this is a subsidy. A homeowner and a renter all else being equal, the renter pays far higher income taxes. That is discrimination pure and simple.
August 17, 2011 at 3:56 PM #721189Anonymous
GuestOf course this is a subsidy. A homeowner and a renter all else being equal, the renter pays far higher income taxes. That is discrimination pure and simple.
August 17, 2011 at 3:56 PM #721344Anonymous
GuestOf course this is a subsidy. A homeowner and a renter all else being equal, the renter pays far higher income taxes. That is discrimination pure and simple.
August 17, 2011 at 3:56 PM #721709Anonymous
GuestOf course this is a subsidy. A homeowner and a renter all else being equal, the renter pays far higher income taxes. That is discrimination pure and simple.
August 17, 2011 at 4:27 PM #720517UCGal
ParticipantA better description/headline for this topic would be something along the lines of “A case for ending home financing subsidies.”
It’s possible to be a home OWNER and not get the benefits (other than deductible prop taxes.) It’s called having a paid for home.
I don’t mind eliminating the mortgage interest deduction… But then again, I’m on the fast track to paying off my mortgage. My interest deduction is getting whittled away pretty fast.
August 17, 2011 at 4:27 PM #720608UCGal
ParticipantA better description/headline for this topic would be something along the lines of “A case for ending home financing subsidies.”
It’s possible to be a home OWNER and not get the benefits (other than deductible prop taxes.) It’s called having a paid for home.
I don’t mind eliminating the mortgage interest deduction… But then again, I’m on the fast track to paying off my mortgage. My interest deduction is getting whittled away pretty fast.
August 17, 2011 at 4:27 PM #721209UCGal
ParticipantA better description/headline for this topic would be something along the lines of “A case for ending home financing subsidies.”
It’s possible to be a home OWNER and not get the benefits (other than deductible prop taxes.) It’s called having a paid for home.
I don’t mind eliminating the mortgage interest deduction… But then again, I’m on the fast track to paying off my mortgage. My interest deduction is getting whittled away pretty fast.
August 17, 2011 at 4:27 PM #721364UCGal
ParticipantA better description/headline for this topic would be something along the lines of “A case for ending home financing subsidies.”
It’s possible to be a home OWNER and not get the benefits (other than deductible prop taxes.) It’s called having a paid for home.
I don’t mind eliminating the mortgage interest deduction… But then again, I’m on the fast track to paying off my mortgage. My interest deduction is getting whittled away pretty fast.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.