- This topic has 20 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by patb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 18, 2007 at 12:38 PM #11250December 18, 2007 at 1:14 PM #119858FearfulParticipant
I read a comment from someone associated with the Bank of England to the effect that the $0.5 terabuck lending was offset by other liquidity “mopped up”. Whether that means longer term securities not sold, I have no idea.
European central banks are a good deal more opaque than our Fed.
December 18, 2007 at 1:14 PM #119993FearfulParticipantI read a comment from someone associated with the Bank of England to the effect that the $0.5 terabuck lending was offset by other liquidity “mopped up”. Whether that means longer term securities not sold, I have no idea.
European central banks are a good deal more opaque than our Fed.
December 18, 2007 at 1:14 PM #120025FearfulParticipantI read a comment from someone associated with the Bank of England to the effect that the $0.5 terabuck lending was offset by other liquidity “mopped up”. Whether that means longer term securities not sold, I have no idea.
European central banks are a good deal more opaque than our Fed.
December 18, 2007 at 1:14 PM #120072FearfulParticipantI read a comment from someone associated with the Bank of England to the effect that the $0.5 terabuck lending was offset by other liquidity “mopped up”. Whether that means longer term securities not sold, I have no idea.
European central banks are a good deal more opaque than our Fed.
December 18, 2007 at 1:14 PM #120091FearfulParticipantI read a comment from someone associated with the Bank of England to the effect that the $0.5 terabuck lending was offset by other liquidity “mopped up”. Whether that means longer term securities not sold, I have no idea.
European central banks are a good deal more opaque than our Fed.
December 18, 2007 at 2:40 PM #119959drunkleParticipanti was thinking that the ecb giving out money would be a convenient way for us banks in trouble to quietly treadwater…
December 18, 2007 at 2:40 PM #120093drunkleParticipanti was thinking that the ecb giving out money would be a convenient way for us banks in trouble to quietly treadwater…
December 18, 2007 at 2:40 PM #120125drunkleParticipanti was thinking that the ecb giving out money would be a convenient way for us banks in trouble to quietly treadwater…
December 18, 2007 at 2:40 PM #120171drunkleParticipanti was thinking that the ecb giving out money would be a convenient way for us banks in trouble to quietly treadwater…
December 18, 2007 at 2:40 PM #120192drunkleParticipanti was thinking that the ecb giving out money would be a convenient way for us banks in trouble to quietly treadwater…
December 18, 2007 at 3:17 PM #120014crParticipantYeah, that will solve the problem. Because the reason homes aren’t selling is because people haven’t spent enough money they don’t have.
December 18, 2007 at 3:17 PM #120149crParticipantYeah, that will solve the problem. Because the reason homes aren’t selling is because people haven’t spent enough money they don’t have.
December 18, 2007 at 3:17 PM #120180crParticipantYeah, that will solve the problem. Because the reason homes aren’t selling is because people haven’t spent enough money they don’t have.
December 18, 2007 at 3:17 PM #120226crParticipantYeah, that will solve the problem. Because the reason homes aren’t selling is because people haven’t spent enough money they don’t have.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.