- This topic has 125 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 10 months ago by
(former)FormerSanDiegan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 13, 2010 at 10:08 AM #578389July 13, 2010 at 10:21 AM #577366
5yearwaiter
Participant[quote=jpinpb]We have learned nothing. Gambling is a way of life now.[/quote]
But… but here loser turns a winner in this Gambling. Have you seen such anywhere?
July 13, 2010 at 10:21 AM #577460Participant[quote=jpinpb]We have learned nothing. Gambling is a way of life now.[/quote]
But… but here loser turns a winner in this Gambling. Have you seen such anywhere?
July 13, 2010 at 10:21 AM #577987Participant[quote=jpinpb]We have learned nothing. Gambling is a way of life now.[/quote]
But… but here loser turns a winner in this Gambling. Have you seen such anywhere?
July 13, 2010 at 10:21 AM #578093Participant[quote=jpinpb]We have learned nothing. Gambling is a way of life now.[/quote]
But… but here loser turns a winner in this Gambling. Have you seen such anywhere?
July 13, 2010 at 10:21 AM #578394Participant[quote=jpinpb]We have learned nothing. Gambling is a way of life now.[/quote]
But… but here loser turns a winner in this Gambling. Have you seen such anywhere?
July 13, 2010 at 8:02 PM #577686jpinpb
ParticipantAll the taxpayers are losing, including the homeowners overpaying on their homes. They are subsidizing their own homes (and others) while paying extra for it.
July 13, 2010 at 8:02 PM #577780ParticipantAll the taxpayers are losing, including the homeowners overpaying on their homes. They are subsidizing their own homes (and others) while paying extra for it.
July 13, 2010 at 8:02 PM #578307ParticipantAll the taxpayers are losing, including the homeowners overpaying on their homes. They are subsidizing their own homes (and others) while paying extra for it.
July 13, 2010 at 8:02 PM #578413ParticipantAll the taxpayers are losing, including the homeowners overpaying on their homes. They are subsidizing their own homes (and others) while paying extra for it.
July 13, 2010 at 8:02 PM #578715ParticipantAll the taxpayers are losing, including the homeowners overpaying on their homes. They are subsidizing their own homes (and others) while paying extra for it.
July 13, 2010 at 10:33 PM #577736patb
Participant[quote=FormerSanDiegan]That’s why I suggest they might not fund these unless the LTV of 75% or better, likely 70%.
That way the lender has at least some additional protection against a declining market.Seems to me to be a reasonable risk at today’s price levels.[/quote]
this product is just expensive rent with a nasty termination fee.
July 13, 2010 at 10:33 PM #577830Participant[quote=FormerSanDiegan]That’s why I suggest they might not fund these unless the LTV of 75% or better, likely 70%.
That way the lender has at least some additional protection against a declining market.Seems to me to be a reasonable risk at today’s price levels.[/quote]
this product is just expensive rent with a nasty termination fee.
July 13, 2010 at 10:33 PM #578357Participant[quote=FormerSanDiegan]That’s why I suggest they might not fund these unless the LTV of 75% or better, likely 70%.
That way the lender has at least some additional protection against a declining market.Seems to me to be a reasonable risk at today’s price levels.[/quote]
this product is just expensive rent with a nasty termination fee.
July 13, 2010 at 10:33 PM #578463Participant[quote=FormerSanDiegan]That’s why I suggest they might not fund these unless the LTV of 75% or better, likely 70%.
That way the lender has at least some additional protection against a declining market.Seems to me to be a reasonable risk at today’s price levels.[/quote]
this product is just expensive rent with a nasty termination fee.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.