- This topic has 170 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 7 months ago by Kilohana.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 12, 2008 at 3:38 PM #286765October 12, 2008 at 4:21 PM #286453fmParticipant
[quote=DWCAP]
No, the surplus Clinton is given credit for was due to the tech bubble. People were day trading stocks like crack and it generated HUGE tax$$$. When it all burst in 2000, it didnt show up till 2001 when we had a new prez. He then latched onto 9/11 as a chance to make a name for himself and get reelected/keep repub’s in power. Fiscal disaplin in the repub’s broke down then in a rush to get reelected and we ended up roughly doubling our national debt. The housing bubble was used/created to limit the pain of the 1990’s stock bubble.
[/quote]I agree about the tech bubble, in the 90’s that was the time when the internet and computers became a commonplace feature in the household because technology made it affordable at that time. I don’t really see the government having to do much with that.
October 12, 2008 at 4:21 PM #286746fmParticipant[quote=DWCAP]
No, the surplus Clinton is given credit for was due to the tech bubble. People were day trading stocks like crack and it generated HUGE tax$$$. When it all burst in 2000, it didnt show up till 2001 when we had a new prez. He then latched onto 9/11 as a chance to make a name for himself and get reelected/keep repub’s in power. Fiscal disaplin in the repub’s broke down then in a rush to get reelected and we ended up roughly doubling our national debt. The housing bubble was used/created to limit the pain of the 1990’s stock bubble.
[/quote]I agree about the tech bubble, in the 90’s that was the time when the internet and computers became a commonplace feature in the household because technology made it affordable at that time. I don’t really see the government having to do much with that.
October 12, 2008 at 4:21 PM #286764fmParticipant[quote=DWCAP]
No, the surplus Clinton is given credit for was due to the tech bubble. People were day trading stocks like crack and it generated HUGE tax$$$. When it all burst in 2000, it didnt show up till 2001 when we had a new prez. He then latched onto 9/11 as a chance to make a name for himself and get reelected/keep repub’s in power. Fiscal disaplin in the repub’s broke down then in a rush to get reelected and we ended up roughly doubling our national debt. The housing bubble was used/created to limit the pain of the 1990’s stock bubble.
[/quote]I agree about the tech bubble, in the 90’s that was the time when the internet and computers became a commonplace feature in the household because technology made it affordable at that time. I don’t really see the government having to do much with that.
October 12, 2008 at 4:21 PM #286792fmParticipant[quote=DWCAP]
No, the surplus Clinton is given credit for was due to the tech bubble. People were day trading stocks like crack and it generated HUGE tax$$$. When it all burst in 2000, it didnt show up till 2001 when we had a new prez. He then latched onto 9/11 as a chance to make a name for himself and get reelected/keep repub’s in power. Fiscal disaplin in the repub’s broke down then in a rush to get reelected and we ended up roughly doubling our national debt. The housing bubble was used/created to limit the pain of the 1990’s stock bubble.
[/quote]I agree about the tech bubble, in the 90’s that was the time when the internet and computers became a commonplace feature in the household because technology made it affordable at that time. I don’t really see the government having to do much with that.
October 12, 2008 at 4:21 PM #286795fmParticipant[quote=DWCAP]
No, the surplus Clinton is given credit for was due to the tech bubble. People were day trading stocks like crack and it generated HUGE tax$$$. When it all burst in 2000, it didnt show up till 2001 when we had a new prez. He then latched onto 9/11 as a chance to make a name for himself and get reelected/keep repub’s in power. Fiscal disaplin in the repub’s broke down then in a rush to get reelected and we ended up roughly doubling our national debt. The housing bubble was used/created to limit the pain of the 1990’s stock bubble.
[/quote]I agree about the tech bubble, in the 90’s that was the time when the internet and computers became a commonplace feature in the household because technology made it affordable at that time. I don’t really see the government having to do much with that.
October 12, 2008 at 6:14 PM #286478michaelParticipant“I agree about the tech bubble, in the 90’s that was the time when the internet and computers became a commonplace feature in the household because technology made it affordable at that time. I don’t really see the government having to do much with that.”
What?
October 12, 2008 at 6:14 PM #286771michaelParticipant“I agree about the tech bubble, in the 90’s that was the time when the internet and computers became a commonplace feature in the household because technology made it affordable at that time. I don’t really see the government having to do much with that.”
What?
October 12, 2008 at 6:14 PM #286789michaelParticipant“I agree about the tech bubble, in the 90’s that was the time when the internet and computers became a commonplace feature in the household because technology made it affordable at that time. I don’t really see the government having to do much with that.”
What?
October 12, 2008 at 6:14 PM #286817michaelParticipant“I agree about the tech bubble, in the 90’s that was the time when the internet and computers became a commonplace feature in the household because technology made it affordable at that time. I don’t really see the government having to do much with that.”
What?
October 12, 2008 at 6:14 PM #286820michaelParticipant“I agree about the tech bubble, in the 90’s that was the time when the internet and computers became a commonplace feature in the household because technology made it affordable at that time. I don’t really see the government having to do much with that.”
What?
October 12, 2008 at 6:35 PM #286498jpinpbParticipantSo while comment was made about Fannie and Freddie giving Dems money, turns out 2 million was funneled to Rich Davis and his firm up until August, you know, chief executive officer of the John McCain 2008 presidential campaign.
Fannie and Freddie were more vicitms. Even if they were regulated as Reps wanted, that would’ve done little to control all the banks and CDS that were occurring.
October 12, 2008 at 6:35 PM #286791jpinpbParticipantSo while comment was made about Fannie and Freddie giving Dems money, turns out 2 million was funneled to Rich Davis and his firm up until August, you know, chief executive officer of the John McCain 2008 presidential campaign.
Fannie and Freddie were more vicitms. Even if they were regulated as Reps wanted, that would’ve done little to control all the banks and CDS that were occurring.
October 12, 2008 at 6:35 PM #286809jpinpbParticipantSo while comment was made about Fannie and Freddie giving Dems money, turns out 2 million was funneled to Rich Davis and his firm up until August, you know, chief executive officer of the John McCain 2008 presidential campaign.
Fannie and Freddie were more vicitms. Even if they were regulated as Reps wanted, that would’ve done little to control all the banks and CDS that were occurring.
October 12, 2008 at 6:35 PM #286836jpinpbParticipantSo while comment was made about Fannie and Freddie giving Dems money, turns out 2 million was funneled to Rich Davis and his firm up until August, you know, chief executive officer of the John McCain 2008 presidential campaign.
Fannie and Freddie were more vicitms. Even if they were regulated as Reps wanted, that would’ve done little to control all the banks and CDS that were occurring.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.