Thank you Clinton for the Sub-Prime Boom! 1999 NYT Article

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=CardiffBaseball]

As far as thanking Bill, you chaps ought to thank Dick Morris who told Hillary and staff to get the fvck out of the room so that Bill could “triangulate”. [/quote]

As much as I hate the dude, you are probably right on this.

Dicky was a tool but his political acumen is impressive.

He is sort of the slightly less evil version of Karl Rove.

If you want an apples to apples comparison, he was a director in the 2000 Fox campaign in Mexico. James Carville held the same position on the opposing ticket for Labastida. Fox won pretty decisively. Not bad for a prick advising a midwesterner from Guanajuato.

[jficquette]

[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=jficquette][quote=jpinpb]And for the past 8 years the Bush administration turned a blind eye.[/quote]

Does that mean you disagree with the 1999 legislation?[/quote]

The issue with legislation is that its execution is as important (sometimes more) than its passage.
I think you guys are really arguing past each other and not at each other.

Would you disagree John?

Also a fun article for fiscal conservatives.
Check the graph at the top.
Notice the years.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_public_debt%5B/quote%5D

Why when presented with evidence supporting claims that this mess started with Clinton you come up with nation debt issues?

Why can’t democrats stick to issues and facts rather then try to cloud them?

Urban do you think an Obama, Pelosi, Reid led country will actually balance the budget as he claims?

Do you really even care that the budget is balanced?

John

[jficquette]

[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=jficquette][quote=jpinpb]And for the past 8 years the Bush administration turned a blind eye.[/quote]

Does that mean you disagree with the 1999 legislation?[/quote]

The issue with legislation is that its execution is as important (sometimes more) than its passage.
I think you guys are really arguing past each other and not at each other.

Would you disagree John?

Also a fun article for fiscal conservatives.
Check the graph at the top.
Notice the years.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_public_debt%5B/quote%5D

Why when presented with evidence supporting claims that this mess started with Clinton you come up with nation debt issues?

Why can’t democrats stick to issues and facts rather then try to cloud them?

Urban do you think an Obama, Pelosi, Reid led country will actually balance the budget as he claims?

Do you really even care that the budget is balanced?

John

[jficquette]

[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=jficquette][quote=jpinpb]And for the past 8 years the Bush administration turned a blind eye.[/quote]

Does that mean you disagree with the 1999 legislation?[/quote]

The issue with legislation is that its execution is as important (sometimes more) than its passage.
I think you guys are really arguing past each other and not at each other.

Would you disagree John?

Also a fun article for fiscal conservatives.
Check the graph at the top.
Notice the years.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_public_debt%5B/quote%5D

Why when presented with evidence supporting claims that this mess started with Clinton you come up with nation debt issues?

Why can’t democrats stick to issues and facts rather then try to cloud them?

Urban do you think an Obama, Pelosi, Reid led country will actually balance the budget as he claims?

Do you really even care that the budget is balanced?

John

[jficquette]

[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=jficquette][quote=jpinpb]And for the past 8 years the Bush administration turned a blind eye.[/quote]

Does that mean you disagree with the 1999 legislation?[/quote]

The issue with legislation is that its execution is as important (sometimes more) than its passage.
I think you guys are really arguing past each other and not at each other.

Would you disagree John?

Also a fun article for fiscal conservatives.
Check the graph at the top.
Notice the years.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_public_debt%5B/quote%5D

Why when presented with evidence supporting claims that this mess started with Clinton you come up with nation debt issues?

Why can’t democrats stick to issues and facts rather then try to cloud them?

Urban do you think an Obama, Pelosi, Reid led country will actually balance the budget as he claims?

Do you really even care that the budget is balanced?

John

[jficquette]

[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=jficquette][quote=jpinpb]And for the past 8 years the Bush administration turned a blind eye.[/quote]

Does that mean you disagree with the 1999 legislation?[/quote]

The issue with legislation is that its execution is as important (sometimes more) than its passage.
I think you guys are really arguing past each other and not at each other.

Would you disagree John?

Also a fun article for fiscal conservatives.
Check the graph at the top.
Notice the years.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_public_debt%5B/quote%5D

Why when presented with evidence supporting claims that this mess started with Clinton you come up with nation debt issues?

Why can’t democrats stick to issues and facts rather then try to cloud them?

Urban do you think an Obama, Pelosi, Reid led country will actually balance the budget as he claims?

Do you really even care that the budget is balanced?

John

[jficquette]

[quote=jpinpb]You neglected to mention the surplus that we had w/Clinton, in contrast to the deficit we have now.[/quote]

The surplus was due to the Republican’s reform of welfare and other items in its contract with America passed in 1994.

Clinton was just along for the ride.

[jficquette]

[quote=jpinpb]You neglected to mention the surplus that we had w/Clinton, in contrast to the deficit we have now.[/quote]

The surplus was due to the Republican’s reform of welfare and other items in its contract with America passed in 1994.

Clinton was just along for the ride.

[jficquette]

[quote=jpinpb]You neglected to mention the surplus that we had w/Clinton, in contrast to the deficit we have now.[/quote]

The surplus was due to the Republican’s reform of welfare and other items in its contract with America passed in 1994.

Clinton was just along for the ride.

[jficquette]

[quote=jpinpb]You neglected to mention the surplus that we had w/Clinton, in contrast to the deficit we have now.[/quote]

The surplus was due to the Republican’s reform of welfare and other items in its contract with America passed in 1994.

Clinton was just along for the ride.

[jficquette]

[quote=jpinpb]You neglected to mention the surplus that we had w/Clinton, in contrast to the deficit we have now.[/quote]

The surplus was due to the Republican’s reform of welfare and other items in its contract with America passed in 1994.

Clinton was just along for the ride.

[svelte]

[quote=jficquette][quote=jpinpb]You neglected to mention the surplus that we had w/Clinton, in contrast to the deficit we have now.[/quote]

The surplus was due to the Republican’s reform of welfare and other items in its contract with America passed in 1994.

Clinton was just along for the ride.[/quote]

You neglected to mention that the Republican Congress dismantled the PAYGO balanced budget rules in the early 2000s so they could finance Bush’s tax cuts with deficit spending.

[svelte]

[quote=jficquette][quote=jpinpb]You neglected to mention the surplus that we had w/Clinton, in contrast to the deficit we have now.[/quote]

The surplus was due to the Republican’s reform of welfare and other items in its contract with America passed in 1994.

Clinton was just along for the ride.[/quote]

You neglected to mention that the Republican Congress dismantled the PAYGO balanced budget rules in the early 2000s so they could finance Bush’s tax cuts with deficit spending.

[svelte]

[quote=jficquette][quote=jpinpb]You neglected to mention the surplus that we had w/Clinton, in contrast to the deficit we have now.[/quote]

The surplus was due to the Republican’s reform of welfare and other items in its contract with America passed in 1994.

Clinton was just along for the ride.[/quote]

You neglected to mention that the Republican Congress dismantled the PAYGO balanced budget rules in the early 2000s so they could finance Bush’s tax cuts with deficit spending.

[svelte]

[quote=jficquette][quote=jpinpb]You neglected to mention the surplus that we had w/Clinton, in contrast to the deficit we have now.[/quote]

The surplus was due to the Republican’s reform of welfare and other items in its contract with America passed in 1994.

Clinton was just along for the ride.[/quote]

You neglected to mention that the Republican Congress dismantled the PAYGO balanced budget rules in the early 2000s so they could finance Bush’s tax cuts with deficit spending.

[Author]

Posts