- This topic has 10 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 1 month ago by Eugene.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 13, 2009 at 7:02 PM #15482April 13, 2009 at 8:05 PM #380315SK in CVParticipant
Those three choices aren’t possible.
If the couple is married, they must file as a married couple, either jointly or separately. If they’re not married, they can only file as single. (There are some rare extenuating circumstances where this isn’t true.)
If they have no other income and no significant other deductions, and these options were all available, the difference between the three would be less than my minimum consulting fee.
You now owe me $250.
April 13, 2009 at 8:05 PM #380588SK in CVParticipantThose three choices aren’t possible.
If the couple is married, they must file as a married couple, either jointly or separately. If they’re not married, they can only file as single. (There are some rare extenuating circumstances where this isn’t true.)
If they have no other income and no significant other deductions, and these options were all available, the difference between the three would be less than my minimum consulting fee.
You now owe me $250.
April 13, 2009 at 8:05 PM #380776SK in CVParticipantThose three choices aren’t possible.
If the couple is married, they must file as a married couple, either jointly or separately. If they’re not married, they can only file as single. (There are some rare extenuating circumstances where this isn’t true.)
If they have no other income and no significant other deductions, and these options were all available, the difference between the three would be less than my minimum consulting fee.
You now owe me $250.
April 13, 2009 at 8:05 PM #380824SK in CVParticipantThose three choices aren’t possible.
If the couple is married, they must file as a married couple, either jointly or separately. If they’re not married, they can only file as single. (There are some rare extenuating circumstances where this isn’t true.)
If they have no other income and no significant other deductions, and these options were all available, the difference between the three would be less than my minimum consulting fee.
You now owe me $250.
April 13, 2009 at 8:05 PM #380951SK in CVParticipantThose three choices aren’t possible.
If the couple is married, they must file as a married couple, either jointly or separately. If they’re not married, they can only file as single. (There are some rare extenuating circumstances where this isn’t true.)
If they have no other income and no significant other deductions, and these options were all available, the difference between the three would be less than my minimum consulting fee.
You now owe me $250.
April 13, 2009 at 9:26 PM #380375EugeneParticipantThis is a classic example of “marriage penalty” where two individuals would pay higher taxes as married filing jointly than as single. (The difference would have been ~$250 if not for the stimulus rebate, which reduces it to $150.)
In contrast, a couple with 120k and 40k incomes would save close to a thousand dollars by marrying and filing a joint return.
April 13, 2009 at 9:26 PM #380648EugeneParticipantThis is a classic example of “marriage penalty” where two individuals would pay higher taxes as married filing jointly than as single. (The difference would have been ~$250 if not for the stimulus rebate, which reduces it to $150.)
In contrast, a couple with 120k and 40k incomes would save close to a thousand dollars by marrying and filing a joint return.
April 13, 2009 at 9:26 PM #380836EugeneParticipantThis is a classic example of “marriage penalty” where two individuals would pay higher taxes as married filing jointly than as single. (The difference would have been ~$250 if not for the stimulus rebate, which reduces it to $150.)
In contrast, a couple with 120k and 40k incomes would save close to a thousand dollars by marrying and filing a joint return.
April 13, 2009 at 9:26 PM #380884EugeneParticipantThis is a classic example of “marriage penalty” where two individuals would pay higher taxes as married filing jointly than as single. (The difference would have been ~$250 if not for the stimulus rebate, which reduces it to $150.)
In contrast, a couple with 120k and 40k incomes would save close to a thousand dollars by marrying and filing a joint return.
April 13, 2009 at 9:26 PM #381012EugeneParticipantThis is a classic example of “marriage penalty” where two individuals would pay higher taxes as married filing jointly than as single. (The difference would have been ~$250 if not for the stimulus rebate, which reduces it to $150.)
In contrast, a couple with 120k and 40k incomes would save close to a thousand dollars by marrying and filing a joint return.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.