- This topic has 478 replies, 37 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 4 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 13, 2007 at 11:47 PM #59236June 14, 2007 at 6:38 AM #59213PDParticipant
Cyphire, it takes nearly two dollars to equal a British pound. Further, if a Whopper is on the menu for $4 here, it is on the menu for 4 pounds there ($8). When looking at the price of items there, the number seems right, however, you have to mulitply by two to convert to dollars. For an American converting dollars, your daily needs are twice as expensive. Further, the Brits are some of the most highly taxed people on the planet.
They do not make twice as much as we do.
June 14, 2007 at 6:38 AM #59242PDParticipantCyphire, it takes nearly two dollars to equal a British pound. Further, if a Whopper is on the menu for $4 here, it is on the menu for 4 pounds there ($8). When looking at the price of items there, the number seems right, however, you have to mulitply by two to convert to dollars. For an American converting dollars, your daily needs are twice as expensive. Further, the Brits are some of the most highly taxed people on the planet.
They do not make twice as much as we do.
June 14, 2007 at 9:29 AM #59247(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI found a source that prices per capita income in both dollars and purchasing power (to try to account for the effect that PD points out).
In both cases the US per capita income is higher than the UK.
Per capita income (US$)
US: 43,560
UK: 37,740Adjusted for purchasing power
US: 42,000
UK: 33,960SOURCE:
http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DATASTATISTICS/Resources/GNIPC.pdfSo, the first point is that incomes are actually nominally higher in the US (not lower) AND purchasing power extends that further.
A previous post showed UK median income as higher than the US. How is the median higher than the per capita income ? Please provide a source. If the median is indeed higher it means that there must be much fewer people in the workforce in the UK as a percentage of the population than in the US.
Fewer % of workers pulling the weight means more social programmes, and the associated higher tax burden.June 14, 2007 at 9:29 AM #59276(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantI found a source that prices per capita income in both dollars and purchasing power (to try to account for the effect that PD points out).
In both cases the US per capita income is higher than the UK.
Per capita income (US$)
US: 43,560
UK: 37,740Adjusted for purchasing power
US: 42,000
UK: 33,960SOURCE:
http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DATASTATISTICS/Resources/GNIPC.pdfSo, the first point is that incomes are actually nominally higher in the US (not lower) AND purchasing power extends that further.
A previous post showed UK median income as higher than the US. How is the median higher than the per capita income ? Please provide a source. If the median is indeed higher it means that there must be much fewer people in the workforce in the UK as a percentage of the population than in the US.
Fewer % of workers pulling the weight means more social programmes, and the associated higher tax burden.June 14, 2007 at 2:44 PM #593635yearwaiterParticipantNot really prices came down to 2004 level, due to the reason the homeowners still in the dream of to get that level price to their houses. Reality is whoever want to must sell they sure already slipping those 2004 price too. The worst had yet to come.
June 14, 2007 at 2:44 PM #593925yearwaiterParticipantNot really prices came down to 2004 level, due to the reason the homeowners still in the dream of to get that level price to their houses. Reality is whoever want to must sell they sure already slipping those 2004 price too. The worst had yet to come.
June 14, 2007 at 5:10 PM #59408AnonymousGuestAw, PD and FSD, you’re being logical. That’s not fair!
Approach this is if you are dealing with a pouty, recalcitrant man-child. And, use your command voice, as the man-child has his hands over his ears and is humming loudly.
cyphire, I’m going to put you in a timeout!
Brits are poor; that’s why they have bad teeth.
June 14, 2007 at 5:10 PM #59439AnonymousGuestAw, PD and FSD, you’re being logical. That’s not fair!
Approach this is if you are dealing with a pouty, recalcitrant man-child. And, use your command voice, as the man-child has his hands over his ears and is humming loudly.
cyphire, I’m going to put you in a timeout!
Brits are poor; that’s why they have bad teeth.
June 14, 2007 at 5:21 PM #59412what_a_disastaParticipant“Brits are poor; that’s why they have bad teeth.”
Comedy gold!
I think the median income could be higher as per capita would be the mean. That means that there are more poor people in the US than the UK but there are richer people in the US than the UK. Ergo UK is the fairer society.
June 14, 2007 at 5:21 PM #59443what_a_disastaParticipant“Brits are poor; that’s why they have bad teeth.”
Comedy gold!
I think the median income could be higher as per capita would be the mean. That means that there are more poor people in the US than the UK but there are richer people in the US than the UK. Ergo UK is the fairer society.
June 14, 2007 at 8:01 PM #59438PDParticipantErgo UK is the fairer society
Eh… What? Did you know that the inheritance tax is crushing there? From memory, I think it is (or used to be) well over 50%. Many very old families have lost holdings that have been passed down for hundreds of years due to insanely unfair inheritance taxes.
June 14, 2007 at 8:01 PM #59469PDParticipantErgo UK is the fairer society
Eh… What? Did you know that the inheritance tax is crushing there? From memory, I think it is (or used to be) well over 50%. Many very old families have lost holdings that have been passed down for hundreds of years due to insanely unfair inheritance taxes.
June 14, 2007 at 9:04 PM #59450AnonymousGuestAnd, speaking of Brits (or Welsh) with bad teeth, what a moving video (courtesy of lucianne.com). Special gift this bloke has.
June 14, 2007 at 9:04 PM #59481AnonymousGuestAnd, speaking of Brits (or Welsh) with bad teeth, what a moving video (courtesy of lucianne.com). Special gift this bloke has.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.