Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Spitzer is back. hoooray
- This topic has 130 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 11 months ago by
Aecetia.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 7, 2009 at 10:45 AM #395094May 7, 2009 at 10:51 AM #394435
Rt.66
ParticipantSomeone call Giethner!
We can solve the depression with taxed legal hookers and more PF Changs. Maybe we can combine the two enterprises? PF Wangs?
Legalize pot too maybe and we’d have a whole new industry. Or existing industries could add pot to the menu to boost revenues. PF Chongs?
May 7, 2009 at 10:51 AM #394690ParticipantSomeone call Giethner!
We can solve the depression with taxed legal hookers and more PF Changs. Maybe we can combine the two enterprises? PF Wangs?
Legalize pot too maybe and we’d have a whole new industry. Or existing industries could add pot to the menu to boost revenues. PF Chongs?
May 7, 2009 at 10:51 AM #394908ParticipantSomeone call Giethner!
We can solve the depression with taxed legal hookers and more PF Changs. Maybe we can combine the two enterprises? PF Wangs?
Legalize pot too maybe and we’d have a whole new industry. Or existing industries could add pot to the menu to boost revenues. PF Chongs?
May 7, 2009 at 10:51 AM #394961ParticipantSomeone call Giethner!
We can solve the depression with taxed legal hookers and more PF Changs. Maybe we can combine the two enterprises? PF Wangs?
Legalize pot too maybe and we’d have a whole new industry. Or existing industries could add pot to the menu to boost revenues. PF Chongs?
May 7, 2009 at 10:51 AM #395104ParticipantSomeone call Giethner!
We can solve the depression with taxed legal hookers and more PF Changs. Maybe we can combine the two enterprises? PF Wangs?
Legalize pot too maybe and we’d have a whole new industry. Or existing industries could add pot to the menu to boost revenues. PF Chongs?
May 7, 2009 at 2:09 PM #394525Arraya
ParticipantSpitzer got yanked offstage with a giant hook, Vaudeville-style.
The fact that he is back fighting the Fed means something. Juxtapose that with the Feds battle with congress as well as Bloomberg’s means we have a silent coup going on.
They are hiding 2 trillion tax payer money and won’t let anybody know where it is because there could be “severe economic consequences”
In a way, they are threatening the country with financial destruction if they are forced to be transparent.
This is the biggest story of the year because it goes the heart of the economic debacle.
I bet Geithner is gone in a year, Rumsfeld-style…
May 7, 2009 at 2:09 PM #394780ParticipantSpitzer got yanked offstage with a giant hook, Vaudeville-style.
The fact that he is back fighting the Fed means something. Juxtapose that with the Feds battle with congress as well as Bloomberg’s means we have a silent coup going on.
They are hiding 2 trillion tax payer money and won’t let anybody know where it is because there could be “severe economic consequences”
In a way, they are threatening the country with financial destruction if they are forced to be transparent.
This is the biggest story of the year because it goes the heart of the economic debacle.
I bet Geithner is gone in a year, Rumsfeld-style…
May 7, 2009 at 2:09 PM #394998ParticipantSpitzer got yanked offstage with a giant hook, Vaudeville-style.
The fact that he is back fighting the Fed means something. Juxtapose that with the Feds battle with congress as well as Bloomberg’s means we have a silent coup going on.
They are hiding 2 trillion tax payer money and won’t let anybody know where it is because there could be “severe economic consequences”
In a way, they are threatening the country with financial destruction if they are forced to be transparent.
This is the biggest story of the year because it goes the heart of the economic debacle.
I bet Geithner is gone in a year, Rumsfeld-style…
May 7, 2009 at 2:09 PM #395050ParticipantSpitzer got yanked offstage with a giant hook, Vaudeville-style.
The fact that he is back fighting the Fed means something. Juxtapose that with the Feds battle with congress as well as Bloomberg’s means we have a silent coup going on.
They are hiding 2 trillion tax payer money and won’t let anybody know where it is because there could be “severe economic consequences”
In a way, they are threatening the country with financial destruction if they are forced to be transparent.
This is the biggest story of the year because it goes the heart of the economic debacle.
I bet Geithner is gone in a year, Rumsfeld-style…
May 7, 2009 at 2:09 PM #395193ParticipantSpitzer got yanked offstage with a giant hook, Vaudeville-style.
The fact that he is back fighting the Fed means something. Juxtapose that with the Feds battle with congress as well as Bloomberg’s means we have a silent coup going on.
They are hiding 2 trillion tax payer money and won’t let anybody know where it is because there could be “severe economic consequences”
In a way, they are threatening the country with financial destruction if they are forced to be transparent.
This is the biggest story of the year because it goes the heart of the economic debacle.
I bet Geithner is gone in a year, Rumsfeld-style…
May 7, 2009 at 2:31 PM #394590Allan from Fallbrook
Participant[quote=Arraya]Spitzer got yanked offstage with a giant hook, Vaudeville-style.
The fact that he is back fighting the Fed means something. Juxtapose that with the Feds battle with congress as well as Bloomberg’s means we have a silent coup going on.
They are hiding 2 trillion tax payer money and won’t let anybody know where it is because there could be “severe economic consequences”
In a way, they are threatening the country with financial destruction if they are forced to be transparent.
This is the biggest story of the year because it goes the heart of the economic debacle.
I bet Geithner is gone in a year, Rumsfeld-style…[/quote]
Cuomo is going on the warpath also. This has the potential to get truly ugly. Once that curtain hiding the FED gets torn back, a lot of nasty stuff is going to come out.
I’m very interested in hearing Ken Lewis’ take on how he was railroaded by Bernanke and the gubment into buying Merrill. Some of what he is saying comes perilously close to accusing Bernanke of violating disclosure laws.
If Obama gets forced into appointing a special prosecutor to investigate, the fun will really start. I don’t see it happening, but it’s fun to think about.
May 7, 2009 at 2:31 PM #394845Participant[quote=Arraya]Spitzer got yanked offstage with a giant hook, Vaudeville-style.
The fact that he is back fighting the Fed means something. Juxtapose that with the Feds battle with congress as well as Bloomberg’s means we have a silent coup going on.
They are hiding 2 trillion tax payer money and won’t let anybody know where it is because there could be “severe economic consequences”
In a way, they are threatening the country with financial destruction if they are forced to be transparent.
This is the biggest story of the year because it goes the heart of the economic debacle.
I bet Geithner is gone in a year, Rumsfeld-style…[/quote]
Cuomo is going on the warpath also. This has the potential to get truly ugly. Once that curtain hiding the FED gets torn back, a lot of nasty stuff is going to come out.
I’m very interested in hearing Ken Lewis’ take on how he was railroaded by Bernanke and the gubment into buying Merrill. Some of what he is saying comes perilously close to accusing Bernanke of violating disclosure laws.
If Obama gets forced into appointing a special prosecutor to investigate, the fun will really start. I don’t see it happening, but it’s fun to think about.
May 7, 2009 at 2:31 PM #395062Participant[quote=Arraya]Spitzer got yanked offstage with a giant hook, Vaudeville-style.
The fact that he is back fighting the Fed means something. Juxtapose that with the Feds battle with congress as well as Bloomberg’s means we have a silent coup going on.
They are hiding 2 trillion tax payer money and won’t let anybody know where it is because there could be “severe economic consequences”
In a way, they are threatening the country with financial destruction if they are forced to be transparent.
This is the biggest story of the year because it goes the heart of the economic debacle.
I bet Geithner is gone in a year, Rumsfeld-style…[/quote]
Cuomo is going on the warpath also. This has the potential to get truly ugly. Once that curtain hiding the FED gets torn back, a lot of nasty stuff is going to come out.
I’m very interested in hearing Ken Lewis’ take on how he was railroaded by Bernanke and the gubment into buying Merrill. Some of what he is saying comes perilously close to accusing Bernanke of violating disclosure laws.
If Obama gets forced into appointing a special prosecutor to investigate, the fun will really start. I don’t see it happening, but it’s fun to think about.
May 7, 2009 at 2:31 PM #395115Participant[quote=Arraya]Spitzer got yanked offstage with a giant hook, Vaudeville-style.
The fact that he is back fighting the Fed means something. Juxtapose that with the Feds battle with congress as well as Bloomberg’s means we have a silent coup going on.
They are hiding 2 trillion tax payer money and won’t let anybody know where it is because there could be “severe economic consequences”
In a way, they are threatening the country with financial destruction if they are forced to be transparent.
This is the biggest story of the year because it goes the heart of the economic debacle.
I bet Geithner is gone in a year, Rumsfeld-style…[/quote]
Cuomo is going on the warpath also. This has the potential to get truly ugly. Once that curtain hiding the FED gets torn back, a lot of nasty stuff is going to come out.
I’m very interested in hearing Ken Lewis’ take on how he was railroaded by Bernanke and the gubment into buying Merrill. Some of what he is saying comes perilously close to accusing Bernanke of violating disclosure laws.
If Obama gets forced into appointing a special prosecutor to investigate, the fun will really start. I don’t see it happening, but it’s fun to think about.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.