Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Soros using the “D” Word, profited from fall in the pound….proposes a “Good bank” instead of “Bad bank”
- This topic has 35 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 3 months ago by stockstradr.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 28, 2009 at 11:06 PM #338478January 28, 2009 at 11:26 PM #337951bsrsharmaParticipant
had Soros been around then to short the dollar
How exactly would he have done it? I can only think of him borrowing in USD and converting it to some other currency or Gold hoping USD will fall. In those times when credit was tight, who would have loaned him a lot of money? Based on what collateral? there were no derivatives, CDS, leverages to play around with. I don’t think he could have done much, good or bad.
January 28, 2009 at 11:26 PM #338280bsrsharmaParticipanthad Soros been around then to short the dollar
How exactly would he have done it? I can only think of him borrowing in USD and converting it to some other currency or Gold hoping USD will fall. In those times when credit was tight, who would have loaned him a lot of money? Based on what collateral? there were no derivatives, CDS, leverages to play around with. I don’t think he could have done much, good or bad.
January 28, 2009 at 11:26 PM #338374bsrsharmaParticipanthad Soros been around then to short the dollar
How exactly would he have done it? I can only think of him borrowing in USD and converting it to some other currency or Gold hoping USD will fall. In those times when credit was tight, who would have loaned him a lot of money? Based on what collateral? there were no derivatives, CDS, leverages to play around with. I don’t think he could have done much, good or bad.
January 28, 2009 at 11:26 PM #338400bsrsharmaParticipanthad Soros been around then to short the dollar
How exactly would he have done it? I can only think of him borrowing in USD and converting it to some other currency or Gold hoping USD will fall. In those times when credit was tight, who would have loaned him a lot of money? Based on what collateral? there were no derivatives, CDS, leverages to play around with. I don’t think he could have done much, good or bad.
January 28, 2009 at 11:26 PM #338493bsrsharmaParticipanthad Soros been around then to short the dollar
How exactly would he have done it? I can only think of him borrowing in USD and converting it to some other currency or Gold hoping USD will fall. In those times when credit was tight, who would have loaned him a lot of money? Based on what collateral? there were no derivatives, CDS, leverages to play around with. I don’t think he could have done much, good or bad.
January 28, 2009 at 11:45 PM #337956CostaMesaParticipantJonny please. Clearly no understanding whatsoever of the concept of ‘positive feedback loop’.
January 28, 2009 at 11:45 PM #338286CostaMesaParticipantJonny please. Clearly no understanding whatsoever of the concept of ‘positive feedback loop’.
January 28, 2009 at 11:45 PM #338379CostaMesaParticipantJonny please. Clearly no understanding whatsoever of the concept of ‘positive feedback loop’.
January 28, 2009 at 11:45 PM #338406CostaMesaParticipantJonny please. Clearly no understanding whatsoever of the concept of ‘positive feedback loop’.
January 28, 2009 at 11:45 PM #338498CostaMesaParticipantJonny please. Clearly no understanding whatsoever of the concept of ‘positive feedback loop’.
January 29, 2009 at 10:21 AM #338076crParticipant[quote=jonnycsd]Short sellers don’t create problems, they just expose mispricing and help it correct more quickly. Shorts contribute to market efficiency. If they don’t then they quickly loose thier capital and are out of business.
As for the bad bank idea, here is a pretty simple explanation. The idea has been around for a very long time.
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/09_06/b4118000045375.htm
Good luck.[/quote]
I agree to a point, but read Michael Lewis’s The End.
January 29, 2009 at 10:21 AM #338405crParticipant[quote=jonnycsd]Short sellers don’t create problems, they just expose mispricing and help it correct more quickly. Shorts contribute to market efficiency. If they don’t then they quickly loose thier capital and are out of business.
As for the bad bank idea, here is a pretty simple explanation. The idea has been around for a very long time.
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/09_06/b4118000045375.htm
Good luck.[/quote]
I agree to a point, but read Michael Lewis’s The End.
January 29, 2009 at 10:21 AM #338499crParticipant[quote=jonnycsd]Short sellers don’t create problems, they just expose mispricing and help it correct more quickly. Shorts contribute to market efficiency. If they don’t then they quickly loose thier capital and are out of business.
As for the bad bank idea, here is a pretty simple explanation. The idea has been around for a very long time.
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/09_06/b4118000045375.htm
Good luck.[/quote]
I agree to a point, but read Michael Lewis’s The End.
January 29, 2009 at 10:21 AM #338526crParticipant[quote=jonnycsd]Short sellers don’t create problems, they just expose mispricing and help it correct more quickly. Shorts contribute to market efficiency. If they don’t then they quickly loose thier capital and are out of business.
As for the bad bank idea, here is a pretty simple explanation. The idea has been around for a very long time.
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/09_06/b4118000045375.htm
Good luck.[/quote]
I agree to a point, but read Michael Lewis’s The End.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.