- This topic has 170 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by LA_Renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 18, 2008 at 8:37 PM #272692September 18, 2008 at 8:51 PM #272399HuckleberryParticipant
Agreed, if they pass legislation to that degree every homeowner that is upside down (or even close) in their mortgage, would stop making payments and do whatever it took to prove they couldn’t afford it. Solely to get their loan amount decreased. Even if it meant damaging their credit.
This would be the ultimate injustice to the American homeowner that has been responsibly servicing their loan, and to those that have been patiently waiting for prices to come back to norms.
September 18, 2008 at 8:51 PM #272640HuckleberryParticipantAgreed, if they pass legislation to that degree every homeowner that is upside down (or even close) in their mortgage, would stop making payments and do whatever it took to prove they couldn’t afford it. Solely to get their loan amount decreased. Even if it meant damaging their credit.
This would be the ultimate injustice to the American homeowner that has been responsibly servicing their loan, and to those that have been patiently waiting for prices to come back to norms.
September 18, 2008 at 8:51 PM #272646HuckleberryParticipantAgreed, if they pass legislation to that degree every homeowner that is upside down (or even close) in their mortgage, would stop making payments and do whatever it took to prove they couldn’t afford it. Solely to get their loan amount decreased. Even if it meant damaging their credit.
This would be the ultimate injustice to the American homeowner that has been responsibly servicing their loan, and to those that have been patiently waiting for prices to come back to norms.
September 18, 2008 at 8:51 PM #272689HuckleberryParticipantAgreed, if they pass legislation to that degree every homeowner that is upside down (or even close) in their mortgage, would stop making payments and do whatever it took to prove they couldn’t afford it. Solely to get their loan amount decreased. Even if it meant damaging their credit.
This would be the ultimate injustice to the American homeowner that has been responsibly servicing their loan, and to those that have been patiently waiting for prices to come back to norms.
September 18, 2008 at 8:51 PM #272713HuckleberryParticipantAgreed, if they pass legislation to that degree every homeowner that is upside down (or even close) in their mortgage, would stop making payments and do whatever it took to prove they couldn’t afford it. Solely to get their loan amount decreased. Even if it meant damaging their credit.
This would be the ultimate injustice to the American homeowner that has been responsibly servicing their loan, and to those that have been patiently waiting for prices to come back to norms.
September 18, 2008 at 8:54 PM #272409kev374Participantok, I just watched the segment on CNN Money about this plan and this guy is saying the same thing was done in the early 90s and the government actually made money because it sold off the assets for more than they bid for it. How can this be even possible? 1992 – 97 the market was declining, everyone lost money but the US government made money by AUCTIONING off properties???
September 18, 2008 at 8:54 PM #272650kev374Participantok, I just watched the segment on CNN Money about this plan and this guy is saying the same thing was done in the early 90s and the government actually made money because it sold off the assets for more than they bid for it. How can this be even possible? 1992 – 97 the market was declining, everyone lost money but the US government made money by AUCTIONING off properties???
September 18, 2008 at 8:54 PM #272656kev374Participantok, I just watched the segment on CNN Money about this plan and this guy is saying the same thing was done in the early 90s and the government actually made money because it sold off the assets for more than they bid for it. How can this be even possible? 1992 – 97 the market was declining, everyone lost money but the US government made money by AUCTIONING off properties???
September 18, 2008 at 8:54 PM #272699kev374Participantok, I just watched the segment on CNN Money about this plan and this guy is saying the same thing was done in the early 90s and the government actually made money because it sold off the assets for more than they bid for it. How can this be even possible? 1992 – 97 the market was declining, everyone lost money but the US government made money by AUCTIONING off properties???
September 18, 2008 at 8:54 PM #272724kev374Participantok, I just watched the segment on CNN Money about this plan and this guy is saying the same thing was done in the early 90s and the government actually made money because it sold off the assets for more than they bid for it. How can this be even possible? 1992 – 97 the market was declining, everyone lost money but the US government made money by AUCTIONING off properties???
September 18, 2008 at 9:24 PM #272439BGinRBParticipantCR @ CalculatedRisk had a post about it an hour ago.
September 18, 2008 at 9:24 PM #272680BGinRBParticipantCR @ CalculatedRisk had a post about it an hour ago.
September 18, 2008 at 9:24 PM #272686BGinRBParticipantCR @ CalculatedRisk had a post about it an hour ago.
September 18, 2008 at 9:24 PM #272728BGinRBParticipantCR @ CalculatedRisk had a post about it an hour ago.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.