Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › So How Would You Define Our Economic Ideology Now?
- This topic has 55 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 7 months ago by
zzz.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 16, 2008 at 6:14 PM #13845September 16, 2008 at 6:23 PM #271085
barnaby33ParticipantCorporate Kleptocracy.
September 16, 2008 at 6:23 PM #271321barnaby33ParticipantCorporate Kleptocracy.
September 16, 2008 at 6:23 PM #271333barnaby33ParticipantCorporate Kleptocracy.
September 16, 2008 at 6:23 PM #271372barnaby33ParticipantCorporate Kleptocracy.
September 16, 2008 at 6:23 PM #271398barnaby33ParticipantCorporate Kleptocracy.
September 16, 2008 at 7:21 PM #271095peterb
ParticipantWe never were truely capitalist. Protectionism, subsidies, special contracts….the list goes on and on. It’s just more obvious today because a lot has been done in the last couple of weeks to rescue the world from too fast a melt-down.
Does anyone ever wonder why whatever “system” name is used, there’s always the end result of an elite group that highly resembles an aristocracy? USSR had it, Europes’ got it, we’ve got it, Chinese have it. Central and South America…doesnt really matter the name, it’s the end result.
September 16, 2008 at 7:21 PM #271331ParticipantWe never were truely capitalist. Protectionism, subsidies, special contracts….the list goes on and on. It’s just more obvious today because a lot has been done in the last couple of weeks to rescue the world from too fast a melt-down.
Does anyone ever wonder why whatever “system” name is used, there’s always the end result of an elite group that highly resembles an aristocracy? USSR had it, Europes’ got it, we’ve got it, Chinese have it. Central and South America…doesnt really matter the name, it’s the end result.
September 16, 2008 at 7:21 PM #271343ParticipantWe never were truely capitalist. Protectionism, subsidies, special contracts….the list goes on and on. It’s just more obvious today because a lot has been done in the last couple of weeks to rescue the world from too fast a melt-down.
Does anyone ever wonder why whatever “system” name is used, there’s always the end result of an elite group that highly resembles an aristocracy? USSR had it, Europes’ got it, we’ve got it, Chinese have it. Central and South America…doesnt really matter the name, it’s the end result.
September 16, 2008 at 7:21 PM #271382ParticipantWe never were truely capitalist. Protectionism, subsidies, special contracts….the list goes on and on. It’s just more obvious today because a lot has been done in the last couple of weeks to rescue the world from too fast a melt-down.
Does anyone ever wonder why whatever “system” name is used, there’s always the end result of an elite group that highly resembles an aristocracy? USSR had it, Europes’ got it, we’ve got it, Chinese have it. Central and South America…doesnt really matter the name, it’s the end result.
September 16, 2008 at 7:21 PM #271408ParticipantWe never were truely capitalist. Protectionism, subsidies, special contracts….the list goes on and on. It’s just more obvious today because a lot has been done in the last couple of weeks to rescue the world from too fast a melt-down.
Does anyone ever wonder why whatever “system” name is used, there’s always the end result of an elite group that highly resembles an aristocracy? USSR had it, Europes’ got it, we’ve got it, Chinese have it. Central and South America…doesnt really matter the name, it’s the end result.
September 16, 2008 at 10:09 PM #271200sdduuuude
ParticipantIt’s an effinmessocracy.
September 16, 2008 at 10:09 PM #271436ParticipantIt’s an effinmessocracy.
September 16, 2008 at 10:09 PM #271448ParticipantIt’s an effinmessocracy.
September 16, 2008 at 10:09 PM #271489ParticipantIt’s an effinmessocracy.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.