- This topic has 100 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 12 months ago by sd_bear.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 15, 2008 at 8:38 AM #204745May 15, 2008 at 11:50 AM #204757DukehornParticipant
If you were a grad student at Wash U in St. Louis or at Duke, I’d definitely take a look at the markets there to buy, but you’re in San Diego and it’s not a cheap market by any stretch of the imagination.
As someone noted above, PI’s do move. My sister’s advisor almost went from NYC to LA. I have a number of friends who moved with their advisors (from NC State to Columbia, from UVA to UC-Irvine) What are you going to do then?
You’re a grad student. While I applaud the homeowner mindset, I still think there’s something to being flexible as a grad student. To rent one place and move somewhere else if you like a different neighborhood. Why anchor yourself at your age?
May 15, 2008 at 11:50 AM #204803DukehornParticipantIf you were a grad student at Wash U in St. Louis or at Duke, I’d definitely take a look at the markets there to buy, but you’re in San Diego and it’s not a cheap market by any stretch of the imagination.
As someone noted above, PI’s do move. My sister’s advisor almost went from NYC to LA. I have a number of friends who moved with their advisors (from NC State to Columbia, from UVA to UC-Irvine) What are you going to do then?
You’re a grad student. While I applaud the homeowner mindset, I still think there’s something to being flexible as a grad student. To rent one place and move somewhere else if you like a different neighborhood. Why anchor yourself at your age?
May 15, 2008 at 11:50 AM #204835DukehornParticipantIf you were a grad student at Wash U in St. Louis or at Duke, I’d definitely take a look at the markets there to buy, but you’re in San Diego and it’s not a cheap market by any stretch of the imagination.
As someone noted above, PI’s do move. My sister’s advisor almost went from NYC to LA. I have a number of friends who moved with their advisors (from NC State to Columbia, from UVA to UC-Irvine) What are you going to do then?
You’re a grad student. While I applaud the homeowner mindset, I still think there’s something to being flexible as a grad student. To rent one place and move somewhere else if you like a different neighborhood. Why anchor yourself at your age?
May 15, 2008 at 11:50 AM #204854DukehornParticipantIf you were a grad student at Wash U in St. Louis or at Duke, I’d definitely take a look at the markets there to buy, but you’re in San Diego and it’s not a cheap market by any stretch of the imagination.
As someone noted above, PI’s do move. My sister’s advisor almost went from NYC to LA. I have a number of friends who moved with their advisors (from NC State to Columbia, from UVA to UC-Irvine) What are you going to do then?
You’re a grad student. While I applaud the homeowner mindset, I still think there’s something to being flexible as a grad student. To rent one place and move somewhere else if you like a different neighborhood. Why anchor yourself at your age?
May 15, 2008 at 11:50 AM #204891DukehornParticipantIf you were a grad student at Wash U in St. Louis or at Duke, I’d definitely take a look at the markets there to buy, but you’re in San Diego and it’s not a cheap market by any stretch of the imagination.
As someone noted above, PI’s do move. My sister’s advisor almost went from NYC to LA. I have a number of friends who moved with their advisors (from NC State to Columbia, from UVA to UC-Irvine) What are you going to do then?
You’re a grad student. While I applaud the homeowner mindset, I still think there’s something to being flexible as a grad student. To rent one place and move somewhere else if you like a different neighborhood. Why anchor yourself at your age?
May 15, 2008 at 12:48 PM #204802sd_bearParticipantrEQ,
I think the argument to buy falls apart because of these two reasons:
1) Your breakeven/make a little money scenario hinges on it recovering 10% in the next 5 years. I think the absolute most optimistic case is that the condo you buy today remains flat in value for the next 5 years, in which case you were better off renting. I think the realistic scenario is that the value continues to drop for a couple years and then remains flat in value for several years. There is absolutely nothing putting pressure upward on prices, especially in condos right now, and there is so much pushing it down for so many years to come.
2) The place you could buy for 200k is nowhere near as nice as the place you can rent for the same monthly cost.
May 15, 2008 at 12:48 PM #204850sd_bearParticipantrEQ,
I think the argument to buy falls apart because of these two reasons:
1) Your breakeven/make a little money scenario hinges on it recovering 10% in the next 5 years. I think the absolute most optimistic case is that the condo you buy today remains flat in value for the next 5 years, in which case you were better off renting. I think the realistic scenario is that the value continues to drop for a couple years and then remains flat in value for several years. There is absolutely nothing putting pressure upward on prices, especially in condos right now, and there is so much pushing it down for so many years to come.
2) The place you could buy for 200k is nowhere near as nice as the place you can rent for the same monthly cost.
May 15, 2008 at 12:48 PM #204879sd_bearParticipantrEQ,
I think the argument to buy falls apart because of these two reasons:
1) Your breakeven/make a little money scenario hinges on it recovering 10% in the next 5 years. I think the absolute most optimistic case is that the condo you buy today remains flat in value for the next 5 years, in which case you were better off renting. I think the realistic scenario is that the value continues to drop for a couple years and then remains flat in value for several years. There is absolutely nothing putting pressure upward on prices, especially in condos right now, and there is so much pushing it down for so many years to come.
2) The place you could buy for 200k is nowhere near as nice as the place you can rent for the same monthly cost.
May 15, 2008 at 12:48 PM #204898sd_bearParticipantrEQ,
I think the argument to buy falls apart because of these two reasons:
1) Your breakeven/make a little money scenario hinges on it recovering 10% in the next 5 years. I think the absolute most optimistic case is that the condo you buy today remains flat in value for the next 5 years, in which case you were better off renting. I think the realistic scenario is that the value continues to drop for a couple years and then remains flat in value for several years. There is absolutely nothing putting pressure upward on prices, especially in condos right now, and there is so much pushing it down for so many years to come.
2) The place you could buy for 200k is nowhere near as nice as the place you can rent for the same monthly cost.
May 15, 2008 at 12:48 PM #204933sd_bearParticipantrEQ,
I think the argument to buy falls apart because of these two reasons:
1) Your breakeven/make a little money scenario hinges on it recovering 10% in the next 5 years. I think the absolute most optimistic case is that the condo you buy today remains flat in value for the next 5 years, in which case you were better off renting. I think the realistic scenario is that the value continues to drop for a couple years and then remains flat in value for several years. There is absolutely nothing putting pressure upward on prices, especially in condos right now, and there is so much pushing it down for so many years to come.
2) The place you could buy for 200k is nowhere near as nice as the place you can rent for the same monthly cost.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.