- This topic has 255 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 11 months ago by
Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 20, 2009 at 8:27 PM #385557April 20, 2009 at 8:57 PM #384923
ibjames
Participantit’s a shame that realtors have such power over things
April 20, 2009 at 8:57 PM #385193Participantit’s a shame that realtors have such power over things
April 20, 2009 at 8:57 PM #385391Participantit’s a shame that realtors have such power over things
April 20, 2009 at 8:57 PM #385438Participantit’s a shame that realtors have such power over things
April 20, 2009 at 8:57 PM #385578Participantit’s a shame that realtors have such power over things
April 20, 2009 at 10:32 PM #384990SD Realtor
ParticipantIt is a very unfortunate that this sort of stuff happens. Not only does it suck but the only recourse for consumers is to make a complaint to the DRE and/or the better business bureau. Kismet you may want to also ask your agent to call the listing agent and ask them if the agent who is representing the buyer is an agent in the same office. With REO properties usually the lender does ask the listing agent to hold the property on the market for at least a few days.
There is certainly alot of abuse going on. Additional regulation to level the playing field and make short sales AND REO properties more available to EVERYONE would be quite welcome.
April 20, 2009 at 10:32 PM #385257ParticipantIt is a very unfortunate that this sort of stuff happens. Not only does it suck but the only recourse for consumers is to make a complaint to the DRE and/or the better business bureau. Kismet you may want to also ask your agent to call the listing agent and ask them if the agent who is representing the buyer is an agent in the same office. With REO properties usually the lender does ask the listing agent to hold the property on the market for at least a few days.
There is certainly alot of abuse going on. Additional regulation to level the playing field and make short sales AND REO properties more available to EVERYONE would be quite welcome.
April 20, 2009 at 10:32 PM #385456ParticipantIt is a very unfortunate that this sort of stuff happens. Not only does it suck but the only recourse for consumers is to make a complaint to the DRE and/or the better business bureau. Kismet you may want to also ask your agent to call the listing agent and ask them if the agent who is representing the buyer is an agent in the same office. With REO properties usually the lender does ask the listing agent to hold the property on the market for at least a few days.
There is certainly alot of abuse going on. Additional regulation to level the playing field and make short sales AND REO properties more available to EVERYONE would be quite welcome.
April 20, 2009 at 10:32 PM #385504ParticipantIt is a very unfortunate that this sort of stuff happens. Not only does it suck but the only recourse for consumers is to make a complaint to the DRE and/or the better business bureau. Kismet you may want to also ask your agent to call the listing agent and ask them if the agent who is representing the buyer is an agent in the same office. With REO properties usually the lender does ask the listing agent to hold the property on the market for at least a few days.
There is certainly alot of abuse going on. Additional regulation to level the playing field and make short sales AND REO properties more available to EVERYONE would be quite welcome.
April 20, 2009 at 10:32 PM #385643ParticipantIt is a very unfortunate that this sort of stuff happens. Not only does it suck but the only recourse for consumers is to make a complaint to the DRE and/or the better business bureau. Kismet you may want to also ask your agent to call the listing agent and ask them if the agent who is representing the buyer is an agent in the same office. With REO properties usually the lender does ask the listing agent to hold the property on the market for at least a few days.
There is certainly alot of abuse going on. Additional regulation to level the playing field and make short sales AND REO properties more available to EVERYONE would be quite welcome.
April 20, 2009 at 11:42 PM #385000CA renter
ParticipantThis is the same thing we were discussing here, among other places:
http://piggington.com/who_would_you_report_shady_deals_to
BTW, the FBI did get back to me back in November/December and said that they were not pursuing that particular kind of fraud because they didn’t think it was widespread enough. Seriously. 🙁
If law enforcement ever wanted to get ahead of crime, they would read these blogs and get on the ball BEFORE all the damage was done. It’s very frustrating.
People (myself included) were trying to warn them years ago about fraudulent deals that were pushing prices up during the boom. They couldn’t have cared less. Then, when “the world is coming to an end,” and they want our tax money, the govt claims that “NOBODY could have seen this coming.” Lying maggots…
FBI: Are you listening now????
April 20, 2009 at 11:42 PM #385267ParticipantThis is the same thing we were discussing here, among other places:
http://piggington.com/who_would_you_report_shady_deals_to
BTW, the FBI did get back to me back in November/December and said that they were not pursuing that particular kind of fraud because they didn’t think it was widespread enough. Seriously. 🙁
If law enforcement ever wanted to get ahead of crime, they would read these blogs and get on the ball BEFORE all the damage was done. It’s very frustrating.
People (myself included) were trying to warn them years ago about fraudulent deals that were pushing prices up during the boom. They couldn’t have cared less. Then, when “the world is coming to an end,” and they want our tax money, the govt claims that “NOBODY could have seen this coming.” Lying maggots…
FBI: Are you listening now????
April 20, 2009 at 11:42 PM #385466ParticipantThis is the same thing we were discussing here, among other places:
http://piggington.com/who_would_you_report_shady_deals_to
BTW, the FBI did get back to me back in November/December and said that they were not pursuing that particular kind of fraud because they didn’t think it was widespread enough. Seriously. 🙁
If law enforcement ever wanted to get ahead of crime, they would read these blogs and get on the ball BEFORE all the damage was done. It’s very frustrating.
People (myself included) were trying to warn them years ago about fraudulent deals that were pushing prices up during the boom. They couldn’t have cared less. Then, when “the world is coming to an end,” and they want our tax money, the govt claims that “NOBODY could have seen this coming.” Lying maggots…
FBI: Are you listening now????
April 20, 2009 at 11:42 PM #385514ParticipantThis is the same thing we were discussing here, among other places:
http://piggington.com/who_would_you_report_shady_deals_to
BTW, the FBI did get back to me back in November/December and said that they were not pursuing that particular kind of fraud because they didn’t think it was widespread enough. Seriously. 🙁
If law enforcement ever wanted to get ahead of crime, they would read these blogs and get on the ball BEFORE all the damage was done. It’s very frustrating.
People (myself included) were trying to warn them years ago about fraudulent deals that were pushing prices up during the boom. They couldn’t have cared less. Then, when “the world is coming to an end,” and they want our tax money, the govt claims that “NOBODY could have seen this coming.” Lying maggots…
FBI: Are you listening now????
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.