Short-Sale dealings in Encinitas (Jerrilynn)

[Nicole]

.Thanks NCCostal- I didn’t realize there was a transmission line there, good to know. Interesting facts about the chimneys. Also good to know there are no sex offenders there, I never been a fan of them 🙂 I did check out the 071090243 listing online, but ruled it out because of the size (sister-in-law is set to move in 1 week). Perhaps, that was hasty, I’ve asked my husband to see it tomorrow if possible. thanks so much for clarifying things, i went on google maps satellite and saw this big pile of dirt- i got worried it was a nuclear waste dump!

-nicole
new house hunter

[nccoastalseller]

nccoastalseller

The power lines are east of the dirt pile. Looks like someone has done significant grading, makes me wonder what is planned for that empty space.

[nccoastalseller]

nccoastalseller

The power lines are east of the dirt pile. Looks like someone has done significant grading, makes me wonder what is planned for that empty space.

[nccoastalseller]

nccoastalseller

The power lines are east of the dirt pile. Looks like someone has done significant grading, makes me wonder what is planned for that empty space.

[nccoastalseller]

nccoastalseller

The power lines are east of the dirt pile. Looks like someone has done significant grading, makes me wonder what is planned for that empty space.

[nccoastalseller]

nccoastalseller

The power lines are east of the dirt pile. Looks like someone has done significant grading, makes me wonder what is planned for that empty space.

[sdrealtor]

Not a nuclear dump but a closed landfill that has been capped and is currently venting for the next xx years.

Knowing things like this is why you should ALWAYS use a good local realtor. You may decide that it isnt an issue to you but surely you should have known about it.

FWIW the other listing is priced nearly 100K over the current market value. Long time seller has plenty of equity. Go get her if you please.

[sdrealtor]

Not a nuclear dump but a closed landfill that has been capped and is currently venting for the next xx years.

Knowing things like this is why you should ALWAYS use a good local realtor. You may decide that it isnt an issue to you but surely you should have known about it.

FWIW the other listing is priced nearly 100K over the current market value. Long time seller has plenty of equity. Go get her if you please.

[sdrealtor]

Not a nuclear dump but a closed landfill that has been capped and is currently venting for the next xx years.

Knowing things like this is why you should ALWAYS use a good local realtor. You may decide that it isnt an issue to you but surely you should have known about it.

FWIW the other listing is priced nearly 100K over the current market value. Long time seller has plenty of equity. Go get her if you please.

[sdrealtor]

Not a nuclear dump but a closed landfill that has been capped and is currently venting for the next xx years.

Knowing things like this is why you should ALWAYS use a good local realtor. You may decide that it isnt an issue to you but surely you should have known about it.

FWIW the other listing is priced nearly 100K over the current market value. Long time seller has plenty of equity. Go get her if you please.

[sdrealtor]

Not a nuclear dump but a closed landfill that has been capped and is currently venting for the next xx years.

Knowing things like this is why you should ALWAYS use a good local realtor. You may decide that it isnt an issue to you but surely you should have known about it.

FWIW the other listing is priced nearly 100K over the current market value. Long time seller has plenty of equity. Go get her if you please.

[NotCranky]

I Really like the spread sheet idea but I think I might plug in higher rates of depreciation too. Maybe 10% or more per year for 3 years and then no appreciation or depreciation for a while at least. Then I’d try it with modest appreciation after a few years. Staying within ten years is good IMO. Good call SDR. We don’t have a crystal ball so we need to look at the risk with parameters that are not too tight.

[NotCranky]

I Really like the spread sheet idea but I think I might plug in higher rates of depreciation too. Maybe 10% or more per year for 3 years and then no appreciation or depreciation for a while at least. Then I’d try it with modest appreciation after a few years. Staying within ten years is good IMO. Good call SDR. We don’t have a crystal ball so we need to look at the risk with parameters that are not too tight.

[NotCranky]

I Really like the spread sheet idea but I think I might plug in higher rates of depreciation too. Maybe 10% or more per year for 3 years and then no appreciation or depreciation for a while at least. Then I’d try it with modest appreciation after a few years. Staying within ten years is good IMO. Good call SDR. We don’t have a crystal ball so we need to look at the risk with parameters that are not too tight.

[NotCranky]

I Really like the spread sheet idea but I think I might plug in higher rates of depreciation too. Maybe 10% or more per year for 3 years and then no appreciation or depreciation for a while at least. Then I’d try it with modest appreciation after a few years. Staying within ten years is good IMO. Good call SDR. We don’t have a crystal ball so we need to look at the risk with parameters that are not too tight.

[Author]

Posts