- This topic has 155 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by
Allan from Fallbrook.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 30, 2008 at 7:53 PM #249562July 30, 2008 at 8:48 PM #249352
gandalf
ParticipantOMG, not you dan.
<ha,ha>
Hey, what’s your middle name anyway, Hussein or Osama??
I’m Gandalf, the Grey Mullah…
Larger question, do you notice a pattern? All these people out there insinuating Obama is dumb, unqualified, uninformed, uneducated, incompetent? It seems to recur, over and over again, implication being Obama is the affirmative action candidate.
It’s racist. I believe it’s intentional, by design and probably originates with the political machines (Clinton and now Repubs), designed to undercut Obama’s support among people with possibly racist tendencies.
Both McCain and Obama are qualified to be President, two of the better candidates we’ve had in years. Obama’s an extremely smart person, by any measure out there.
July 30, 2008 at 8:48 PM #249503ParticipantOMG, not you dan.
<ha,ha>
Hey, what’s your middle name anyway, Hussein or Osama??
I’m Gandalf, the Grey Mullah…
Larger question, do you notice a pattern? All these people out there insinuating Obama is dumb, unqualified, uninformed, uneducated, incompetent? It seems to recur, over and over again, implication being Obama is the affirmative action candidate.
It’s racist. I believe it’s intentional, by design and probably originates with the political machines (Clinton and now Repubs), designed to undercut Obama’s support among people with possibly racist tendencies.
Both McCain and Obama are qualified to be President, two of the better candidates we’ve had in years. Obama’s an extremely smart person, by any measure out there.
July 30, 2008 at 8:48 PM #249513ParticipantOMG, not you dan.
<ha,ha>
Hey, what’s your middle name anyway, Hussein or Osama??
I’m Gandalf, the Grey Mullah…
Larger question, do you notice a pattern? All these people out there insinuating Obama is dumb, unqualified, uninformed, uneducated, incompetent? It seems to recur, over and over again, implication being Obama is the affirmative action candidate.
It’s racist. I believe it’s intentional, by design and probably originates with the political machines (Clinton and now Repubs), designed to undercut Obama’s support among people with possibly racist tendencies.
Both McCain and Obama are qualified to be President, two of the better candidates we’ve had in years. Obama’s an extremely smart person, by any measure out there.
July 30, 2008 at 8:48 PM #249571ParticipantOMG, not you dan.
<ha,ha>
Hey, what’s your middle name anyway, Hussein or Osama??
I’m Gandalf, the Grey Mullah…
Larger question, do you notice a pattern? All these people out there insinuating Obama is dumb, unqualified, uninformed, uneducated, incompetent? It seems to recur, over and over again, implication being Obama is the affirmative action candidate.
It’s racist. I believe it’s intentional, by design and probably originates with the political machines (Clinton and now Repubs), designed to undercut Obama’s support among people with possibly racist tendencies.
Both McCain and Obama are qualified to be President, two of the better candidates we’ve had in years. Obama’s an extremely smart person, by any measure out there.
July 30, 2008 at 8:48 PM #249582ParticipantOMG, not you dan.
<ha,ha>
Hey, what’s your middle name anyway, Hussein or Osama??
I’m Gandalf, the Grey Mullah…
Larger question, do you notice a pattern? All these people out there insinuating Obama is dumb, unqualified, uninformed, uneducated, incompetent? It seems to recur, over and over again, implication being Obama is the affirmative action candidate.
It’s racist. I believe it’s intentional, by design and probably originates with the political machines (Clinton and now Repubs), designed to undercut Obama’s support among people with possibly racist tendencies.
Both McCain and Obama are qualified to be President, two of the better candidates we’ve had in years. Obama’s an extremely smart person, by any measure out there.
July 30, 2008 at 8:59 PM #249362
JPJonesParticipantAre jficquette and schizo2buyORnot Fox News employees?
No, really…
July 30, 2008 at 8:59 PM #249515JPJonesParticipantAre jficquette and schizo2buyORnot Fox News employees?
No, really…
July 30, 2008 at 8:59 PM #249523JPJonesParticipantAre jficquette and schizo2buyORnot Fox News employees?
No, really…
July 30, 2008 at 8:59 PM #249581JPJonesParticipantAre jficquette and schizo2buyORnot Fox News employees?
No, really…
July 30, 2008 at 8:59 PM #249592JPJonesParticipantAre jficquette and schizo2buyORnot Fox News employees?
No, really…
July 30, 2008 at 9:22 PM #249367ParticipantInflating tires results in a 3% savings in fuel efficiency. That’s significant when applied across the board to the US vehicle fleet. I’d add: lowering the speed limit, purchasing fuel-efficient vehicles instead of gas-sucking SUV’s, taking public transit occasionally, plus major infrastructure investments and subsidies of domestic and alternative energy initiatives including natural gas, solar, nuclear, biofuels and wind.
Post 9/11, from 2001 to 2006, our consumption of foreign oil increased by 25% — POST 9/11!! Fully 50% of that increase was due to changes in the composition of the US vehicle fleet. Bigger cars and trucks with poorer gas mileage, SUVs, Hummers, F150s, etc.
So while we watch our buildings get knocked down and fight a war over in the Middle East with 4000 Americans dead and ~30000 permanently injured, we drive back and forth to our shopping centers in ridiculously large vehicles that burn lots of fuel and we make fun of people who talk about conservation.
For this, we send warehouses full of US money and gold to places like Saudi Arabia every single day, and in turn they send it out to their Wahhabi madrassas in Afg/Pak, Indonesia and East Africa, the minor leagues for Al Qaeda, who then use it to recruit and brainwash fanatics to blow up more of our buildings.
July 30, 2008 at 9:22 PM #249520ParticipantInflating tires results in a 3% savings in fuel efficiency. That’s significant when applied across the board to the US vehicle fleet. I’d add: lowering the speed limit, purchasing fuel-efficient vehicles instead of gas-sucking SUV’s, taking public transit occasionally, plus major infrastructure investments and subsidies of domestic and alternative energy initiatives including natural gas, solar, nuclear, biofuels and wind.
Post 9/11, from 2001 to 2006, our consumption of foreign oil increased by 25% — POST 9/11!! Fully 50% of that increase was due to changes in the composition of the US vehicle fleet. Bigger cars and trucks with poorer gas mileage, SUVs, Hummers, F150s, etc.
So while we watch our buildings get knocked down and fight a war over in the Middle East with 4000 Americans dead and ~30000 permanently injured, we drive back and forth to our shopping centers in ridiculously large vehicles that burn lots of fuel and we make fun of people who talk about conservation.
For this, we send warehouses full of US money and gold to places like Saudi Arabia every single day, and in turn they send it out to their Wahhabi madrassas in Afg/Pak, Indonesia and East Africa, the minor leagues for Al Qaeda, who then use it to recruit and brainwash fanatics to blow up more of our buildings.
July 30, 2008 at 9:22 PM #249528ParticipantInflating tires results in a 3% savings in fuel efficiency. That’s significant when applied across the board to the US vehicle fleet. I’d add: lowering the speed limit, purchasing fuel-efficient vehicles instead of gas-sucking SUV’s, taking public transit occasionally, plus major infrastructure investments and subsidies of domestic and alternative energy initiatives including natural gas, solar, nuclear, biofuels and wind.
Post 9/11, from 2001 to 2006, our consumption of foreign oil increased by 25% — POST 9/11!! Fully 50% of that increase was due to changes in the composition of the US vehicle fleet. Bigger cars and trucks with poorer gas mileage, SUVs, Hummers, F150s, etc.
So while we watch our buildings get knocked down and fight a war over in the Middle East with 4000 Americans dead and ~30000 permanently injured, we drive back and forth to our shopping centers in ridiculously large vehicles that burn lots of fuel and we make fun of people who talk about conservation.
For this, we send warehouses full of US money and gold to places like Saudi Arabia every single day, and in turn they send it out to their Wahhabi madrassas in Afg/Pak, Indonesia and East Africa, the minor leagues for Al Qaeda, who then use it to recruit and brainwash fanatics to blow up more of our buildings.
July 30, 2008 at 9:22 PM #249586ParticipantInflating tires results in a 3% savings in fuel efficiency. That’s significant when applied across the board to the US vehicle fleet. I’d add: lowering the speed limit, purchasing fuel-efficient vehicles instead of gas-sucking SUV’s, taking public transit occasionally, plus major infrastructure investments and subsidies of domestic and alternative energy initiatives including natural gas, solar, nuclear, biofuels and wind.
Post 9/11, from 2001 to 2006, our consumption of foreign oil increased by 25% — POST 9/11!! Fully 50% of that increase was due to changes in the composition of the US vehicle fleet. Bigger cars and trucks with poorer gas mileage, SUVs, Hummers, F150s, etc.
So while we watch our buildings get knocked down and fight a war over in the Middle East with 4000 Americans dead and ~30000 permanently injured, we drive back and forth to our shopping centers in ridiculously large vehicles that burn lots of fuel and we make fun of people who talk about conservation.
For this, we send warehouses full of US money and gold to places like Saudi Arabia every single day, and in turn they send it out to their Wahhabi madrassas in Afg/Pak, Indonesia and East Africa, the minor leagues for Al Qaeda, who then use it to recruit and brainwash fanatics to blow up more of our buildings.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.