Menu

Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Rich in the NYTimes with Shiff and PIMCO

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 41 total)
1 2 3
  • Author
    Posts
  • October 31, 2008 at 10:16 AM #296071
    cr
    Participant

    I love now that newspaper sales are way down they decide it’s time to start acknowledging people like Rich in blogville who they laughingly dismissed as chicken little’s and bitter renters just 2 years ago.

    I can only hope anyone making comments like Krimminger do so purely for rhetoric, and don’t actually think that will happen.

    Anyone with a brain realizes that’s not a solution.

    October 31, 2008 at 2:55 PM #295753
    mike92104
    Participant

    [quote=pemeliza]Say it isn’t so Joe also don’t you know wink nod wink

    ” The borrower, who lives in suburban Los Angeles, took nearly $200,000 in cash out of his house and then paid less than the monthly interest due on his new loan.

    He now owes about $350,000 on a house that is worth only $150,000. He asked not to be identified for fear he would not get a modification, which could reduce his mortgage to $142,500.”

    [/quote]
    I want my $200,000 free money from the government too!
    Or just a $200,000 house for free. That would work as well.

    October 31, 2008 at 2:55 PM #296092
    mike92104
    Participant

    [quote=pemeliza]Say it isn’t so Joe also don’t you know wink nod wink

    ” The borrower, who lives in suburban Los Angeles, took nearly $200,000 in cash out of his house and then paid less than the monthly interest due on his new loan.

    He now owes about $350,000 on a house that is worth only $150,000. He asked not to be identified for fear he would not get a modification, which could reduce his mortgage to $142,500.”

    [/quote]
    I want my $200,000 free money from the government too!
    Or just a $200,000 house for free. That would work as well.

    October 31, 2008 at 2:55 PM #296114
    mike92104
    Participant

    [quote=pemeliza]Say it isn’t so Joe also don’t you know wink nod wink

    ” The borrower, who lives in suburban Los Angeles, took nearly $200,000 in cash out of his house and then paid less than the monthly interest due on his new loan.

    He now owes about $350,000 on a house that is worth only $150,000. He asked not to be identified for fear he would not get a modification, which could reduce his mortgage to $142,500.”

    [/quote]
    I want my $200,000 free money from the government too!
    Or just a $200,000 house for free. That would work as well.

    October 31, 2008 at 2:55 PM #296125
    mike92104
    Participant

    [quote=pemeliza]Say it isn’t so Joe also don’t you know wink nod wink

    ” The borrower, who lives in suburban Los Angeles, took nearly $200,000 in cash out of his house and then paid less than the monthly interest due on his new loan.

    He now owes about $350,000 on a house that is worth only $150,000. He asked not to be identified for fear he would not get a modification, which could reduce his mortgage to $142,500.”

    [/quote]
    I want my $200,000 free money from the government too!
    Or just a $200,000 house for free. That would work as well.

    October 31, 2008 at 2:55 PM #296166
    mike92104
    Participant

    [quote=pemeliza]Say it isn’t so Joe also don’t you know wink nod wink

    ” The borrower, who lives in suburban Los Angeles, took nearly $200,000 in cash out of his house and then paid less than the monthly interest due on his new loan.

    He now owes about $350,000 on a house that is worth only $150,000. He asked not to be identified for fear he would not get a modification, which could reduce his mortgage to $142,500.”

    [/quote]
    I want my $200,000 free money from the government too!
    Or just a $200,000 house for free. That would work as well.

    October 31, 2008 at 4:01 PM #295794
    kewp
    Participant

    [quote=mike92104]
    I want my $200,000 free money from the government too!
    Or just a $200,000 house for free. That would work as well.[/quote]

    So buy a $200k house with other peoples money and don’t make any payments on it.

    I’m seriously considering doing that.

    October 31, 2008 at 4:01 PM #296132
    kewp
    Participant

    [quote=mike92104]
    I want my $200,000 free money from the government too!
    Or just a $200,000 house for free. That would work as well.[/quote]

    So buy a $200k house with other peoples money and don’t make any payments on it.

    I’m seriously considering doing that.

    October 31, 2008 at 4:01 PM #296154
    kewp
    Participant

    [quote=mike92104]
    I want my $200,000 free money from the government too!
    Or just a $200,000 house for free. That would work as well.[/quote]

    So buy a $200k house with other peoples money and don’t make any payments on it.

    I’m seriously considering doing that.

    October 31, 2008 at 4:01 PM #296165
    kewp
    Participant

    [quote=mike92104]
    I want my $200,000 free money from the government too!
    Or just a $200,000 house for free. That would work as well.[/quote]

    So buy a $200k house with other peoples money and don’t make any payments on it.

    I’m seriously considering doing that.

    October 31, 2008 at 4:01 PM #296206
    kewp
    Participant

    [quote=mike92104]
    I want my $200,000 free money from the government too!
    Or just a $200,000 house for free. That would work as well.[/quote]

    So buy a $200k house with other peoples money and don’t make any payments on it.

    I’m seriously considering doing that.

    October 31, 2008 at 7:23 PM #295863
    temeculaguy
    Participant

    It’s nice to see Rich and this website get credit in the msm for calling the collapse. Roubini is getting red carpet treatment right now, even congress wanted his opinion the other day. I propose that Rich be appointed chairman of the bailout funds and he gets to pick random piggies to serve on the committee. I can guarantee that the end result would be better than paulson and company’s plan.

    October 31, 2008 at 7:23 PM #296202
    temeculaguy
    Participant

    It’s nice to see Rich and this website get credit in the msm for calling the collapse. Roubini is getting red carpet treatment right now, even congress wanted his opinion the other day. I propose that Rich be appointed chairman of the bailout funds and he gets to pick random piggies to serve on the committee. I can guarantee that the end result would be better than paulson and company’s plan.

    October 31, 2008 at 7:23 PM #296224
    temeculaguy
    Participant

    It’s nice to see Rich and this website get credit in the msm for calling the collapse. Roubini is getting red carpet treatment right now, even congress wanted his opinion the other day. I propose that Rich be appointed chairman of the bailout funds and he gets to pick random piggies to serve on the committee. I can guarantee that the end result would be better than paulson and company’s plan.

    October 31, 2008 at 7:23 PM #296235
    temeculaguy
    Participant

    It’s nice to see Rich and this website get credit in the msm for calling the collapse. Roubini is getting red carpet treatment right now, even congress wanted his opinion the other day. I propose that Rich be appointed chairman of the bailout funds and he gets to pick random piggies to serve on the committee. I can guarantee that the end result would be better than paulson and company’s plan.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 41 total)
1 2 3
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.