- This topic has 190 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 5 months ago by pencilneck.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 28, 2008 at 11:47 PM #162801February 29, 2008 at 9:08 AM #162530SD RealtorParticipant
Well Deal Hunter, if you get vile retorts they will not be from me. I could not agree more that inflation is the enemy. If we saw a radical tightening of the money supply it would be bad medicine indeed but most likely yield the quickest recovery.
SD Realtor
February 29, 2008 at 9:08 AM #162828SD RealtorParticipantWell Deal Hunter, if you get vile retorts they will not be from me. I could not agree more that inflation is the enemy. If we saw a radical tightening of the money supply it would be bad medicine indeed but most likely yield the quickest recovery.
SD Realtor
February 29, 2008 at 9:08 AM #162843SD RealtorParticipantWell Deal Hunter, if you get vile retorts they will not be from me. I could not agree more that inflation is the enemy. If we saw a radical tightening of the money supply it would be bad medicine indeed but most likely yield the quickest recovery.
SD Realtor
February 29, 2008 at 9:08 AM #162860SD RealtorParticipantWell Deal Hunter, if you get vile retorts they will not be from me. I could not agree more that inflation is the enemy. If we saw a radical tightening of the money supply it would be bad medicine indeed but most likely yield the quickest recovery.
SD Realtor
February 29, 2008 at 9:08 AM #162932SD RealtorParticipantWell Deal Hunter, if you get vile retorts they will not be from me. I could not agree more that inflation is the enemy. If we saw a radical tightening of the money supply it would be bad medicine indeed but most likely yield the quickest recovery.
SD Realtor
February 29, 2008 at 9:37 AM #162561barnaby33ParticipantOn the whole re-write issue, wouldn’t the old contract or mortgage need to be set-aside and a new mortgage recorded? I don’t know the mechanics of the process intimately but it seems like thats more of a story than a reality. The bank just lops off money you owe them? It may be practical, but it seems like there would be a huge paper trail. A paper trail that would have county recorded tie-ins.
As a second issue I don’t think it matters that much. All the bank is doing is recognizing market value such as it is today and adjusting what you owe accordingly. They wouldn’t be doing this is they thought that by selling the property after a foreclosure they would get more or even the same on the open market. It sounds distasteful, because it rewards the risky behavior we on this site abhor, but its still a form of market price discovery.
Is there any way to get more information on this practice?
Josh
February 29, 2008 at 9:37 AM #162858barnaby33ParticipantOn the whole re-write issue, wouldn’t the old contract or mortgage need to be set-aside and a new mortgage recorded? I don’t know the mechanics of the process intimately but it seems like thats more of a story than a reality. The bank just lops off money you owe them? It may be practical, but it seems like there would be a huge paper trail. A paper trail that would have county recorded tie-ins.
As a second issue I don’t think it matters that much. All the bank is doing is recognizing market value such as it is today and adjusting what you owe accordingly. They wouldn’t be doing this is they thought that by selling the property after a foreclosure they would get more or even the same on the open market. It sounds distasteful, because it rewards the risky behavior we on this site abhor, but its still a form of market price discovery.
Is there any way to get more information on this practice?
Josh
February 29, 2008 at 9:37 AM #162873barnaby33ParticipantOn the whole re-write issue, wouldn’t the old contract or mortgage need to be set-aside and a new mortgage recorded? I don’t know the mechanics of the process intimately but it seems like thats more of a story than a reality. The bank just lops off money you owe them? It may be practical, but it seems like there would be a huge paper trail. A paper trail that would have county recorded tie-ins.
As a second issue I don’t think it matters that much. All the bank is doing is recognizing market value such as it is today and adjusting what you owe accordingly. They wouldn’t be doing this is they thought that by selling the property after a foreclosure they would get more or even the same on the open market. It sounds distasteful, because it rewards the risky behavior we on this site abhor, but its still a form of market price discovery.
Is there any way to get more information on this practice?
Josh
February 29, 2008 at 9:37 AM #162889barnaby33ParticipantOn the whole re-write issue, wouldn’t the old contract or mortgage need to be set-aside and a new mortgage recorded? I don’t know the mechanics of the process intimately but it seems like thats more of a story than a reality. The bank just lops off money you owe them? It may be practical, but it seems like there would be a huge paper trail. A paper trail that would have county recorded tie-ins.
As a second issue I don’t think it matters that much. All the bank is doing is recognizing market value such as it is today and adjusting what you owe accordingly. They wouldn’t be doing this is they thought that by selling the property after a foreclosure they would get more or even the same on the open market. It sounds distasteful, because it rewards the risky behavior we on this site abhor, but its still a form of market price discovery.
Is there any way to get more information on this practice?
Josh
February 29, 2008 at 9:37 AM #162962barnaby33ParticipantOn the whole re-write issue, wouldn’t the old contract or mortgage need to be set-aside and a new mortgage recorded? I don’t know the mechanics of the process intimately but it seems like thats more of a story than a reality. The bank just lops off money you owe them? It may be practical, but it seems like there would be a huge paper trail. A paper trail that would have county recorded tie-ins.
As a second issue I don’t think it matters that much. All the bank is doing is recognizing market value such as it is today and adjusting what you owe accordingly. They wouldn’t be doing this is they thought that by selling the property after a foreclosure they would get more or even the same on the open market. It sounds distasteful, because it rewards the risky behavior we on this site abhor, but its still a form of market price discovery.
Is there any way to get more information on this practice?
Josh
February 29, 2008 at 9:48 AM #162575AnonymousGuestWhat I don’t like about this is the idea that it would only be for “distressed” owners. Anyone who bought at the peak is going to be sitting in a house that is worth less than they bought it for, but if you bought something you could afford, too bad. If you bought something you could not afford, you get bailed out. Either bail out everyone or no one.
February 29, 2008 at 9:48 AM #162874AnonymousGuestWhat I don’t like about this is the idea that it would only be for “distressed” owners. Anyone who bought at the peak is going to be sitting in a house that is worth less than they bought it for, but if you bought something you could afford, too bad. If you bought something you could not afford, you get bailed out. Either bail out everyone or no one.
February 29, 2008 at 9:48 AM #162888AnonymousGuestWhat I don’t like about this is the idea that it would only be for “distressed” owners. Anyone who bought at the peak is going to be sitting in a house that is worth less than they bought it for, but if you bought something you could afford, too bad. If you bought something you could not afford, you get bailed out. Either bail out everyone or no one.
February 29, 2008 at 9:48 AM #162905AnonymousGuestWhat I don’t like about this is the idea that it would only be for “distressed” owners. Anyone who bought at the peak is going to be sitting in a house that is worth less than they bought it for, but if you bought something you could afford, too bad. If you bought something you could not afford, you get bailed out. Either bail out everyone or no one.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.