Proud Bush Supporter

[patb]

[quote=peterb]He manageed to win twice. What’s that say about the USA?? [/quote]

That 5 supreme court justices and your vrother running a swing state
are critical

[scaredyclassic]

would be kinda cool if he got prosecuted for war crimes.

[scaredyclassic]

would be kinda cool if he got prosecuted for war crimes.

[scaredyclassic]

would be kinda cool if he got prosecuted for war crimes.

[scaredyclassic]

would be kinda cool if he got prosecuted for war crimes.

[scaredyclassic]

would be kinda cool if he got prosecuted for war crimes.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

scaredy: You are of course advocating that Clinton be tried for war crimes as well, correct?

I would think the “murder” of 500,000 Iraqi women and children would merit a visit to the Hague.

The partisanship and lack of any sort of reasoning or forethought here makes me want to retch.

It’s like TheBreeze with his moral infantilism and Republicans = Bad and Democrats = Good nonsense.

How about assembling the facts and then arguing your point based on the merits of same?

[Allan from Fallbrook]

scaredy: You are of course advocating that Clinton be tried for war crimes as well, correct?

I would think the “murder” of 500,000 Iraqi women and children would merit a visit to the Hague.

The partisanship and lack of any sort of reasoning or forethought here makes me want to retch.

It’s like TheBreeze with his moral infantilism and Republicans = Bad and Democrats = Good nonsense.

How about assembling the facts and then arguing your point based on the merits of same?

[Allan from Fallbrook]

scaredy: You are of course advocating that Clinton be tried for war crimes as well, correct?

I would think the “murder” of 500,000 Iraqi women and children would merit a visit to the Hague.

The partisanship and lack of any sort of reasoning or forethought here makes me want to retch.

It’s like TheBreeze with his moral infantilism and Republicans = Bad and Democrats = Good nonsense.

How about assembling the facts and then arguing your point based on the merits of same?

[Allan from Fallbrook]

scaredy: You are of course advocating that Clinton be tried for war crimes as well, correct?

I would think the “murder” of 500,000 Iraqi women and children would merit a visit to the Hague.

The partisanship and lack of any sort of reasoning or forethought here makes me want to retch.

It’s like TheBreeze with his moral infantilism and Republicans = Bad and Democrats = Good nonsense.

How about assembling the facts and then arguing your point based on the merits of same?

[Allan from Fallbrook]

scaredy: You are of course advocating that Clinton be tried for war crimes as well, correct?

I would think the “murder” of 500,000 Iraqi women and children would merit a visit to the Hague.

The partisanship and lack of any sort of reasoning or forethought here makes me want to retch.

It’s like TheBreeze with his moral infantilism and Republicans = Bad and Democrats = Good nonsense.

How about assembling the facts and then arguing your point based on the merits of same?

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=cooprider]Bush has his faults and so does Obama, the latter simply hasn’t had time to display them. Well, not all of them at least.

I read Time magazine’s article on Person of the Year and I’ve somewhat come to appreciate Barack Hussein’s ambitions, but then again, how’s that saying about good intentions go? I then remembered that publication has been propagating Obama longer than any pigg.

The expectations on Obamination are unrealistic, and he’s done absolutely nothing yet. Except of course not be George Bush.

Once Obama’s fence-riding on Iraq, Afghanistan, Georgia, Iran, and Russia results in another attack on the US you can bet the media and the sheople will turn on him too. [/quote]

While I disagree with the predictions, I otherwise totally agree with cooprider.

I voted out of frustration and hope but then so did many people when voting for w 8 years ago.

As with any president (or anyone in any position), performance is the real measure. There are different ways to measure or evaluate that, and those who score on the broadest range of measurements tend to have the legacy thing going and be remembered most fondly (eg: Reagan, Clinton).

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=cooprider]Bush has his faults and so does Obama, the latter simply hasn’t had time to display them. Well, not all of them at least.

I read Time magazine’s article on Person of the Year and I’ve somewhat come to appreciate Barack Hussein’s ambitions, but then again, how’s that saying about good intentions go? I then remembered that publication has been propagating Obama longer than any pigg.

The expectations on Obamination are unrealistic, and he’s done absolutely nothing yet. Except of course not be George Bush.

Once Obama’s fence-riding on Iraq, Afghanistan, Georgia, Iran, and Russia results in another attack on the US you can bet the media and the sheople will turn on him too. [/quote]

While I disagree with the predictions, I otherwise totally agree with cooprider.

I voted out of frustration and hope but then so did many people when voting for w 8 years ago.

As with any president (or anyone in any position), performance is the real measure. There are different ways to measure or evaluate that, and those who score on the broadest range of measurements tend to have the legacy thing going and be remembered most fondly (eg: Reagan, Clinton).

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=cooprider]Bush has his faults and so does Obama, the latter simply hasn’t had time to display them. Well, not all of them at least.

I read Time magazine’s article on Person of the Year and I’ve somewhat come to appreciate Barack Hussein’s ambitions, but then again, how’s that saying about good intentions go? I then remembered that publication has been propagating Obama longer than any pigg.

The expectations on Obamination are unrealistic, and he’s done absolutely nothing yet. Except of course not be George Bush.

Once Obama’s fence-riding on Iraq, Afghanistan, Georgia, Iran, and Russia results in another attack on the US you can bet the media and the sheople will turn on him too. [/quote]

While I disagree with the predictions, I otherwise totally agree with cooprider.

I voted out of frustration and hope but then so did many people when voting for w 8 years ago.

As with any president (or anyone in any position), performance is the real measure. There are different ways to measure or evaluate that, and those who score on the broadest range of measurements tend to have the legacy thing going and be remembered most fondly (eg: Reagan, Clinton).

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=cooprider]Bush has his faults and so does Obama, the latter simply hasn’t had time to display them. Well, not all of them at least.

I read Time magazine’s article on Person of the Year and I’ve somewhat come to appreciate Barack Hussein’s ambitions, but then again, how’s that saying about good intentions go? I then remembered that publication has been propagating Obama longer than any pigg.

The expectations on Obamination are unrealistic, and he’s done absolutely nothing yet. Except of course not be George Bush.

Once Obama’s fence-riding on Iraq, Afghanistan, Georgia, Iran, and Russia results in another attack on the US you can bet the media and the sheople will turn on him too. [/quote]

While I disagree with the predictions, I otherwise totally agree with cooprider.

I voted out of frustration and hope but then so did many people when voting for w 8 years ago.

As with any president (or anyone in any position), performance is the real measure. There are different ways to measure or evaluate that, and those who score on the broadest range of measurements tend to have the legacy thing going and be remembered most fondly (eg: Reagan, Clinton).

[Author]

Posts