- This topic has 110 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 16 years ago by
San Diego Native.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 30, 2008 at 2:20 PM #196814April 30, 2008 at 2:44 PM #196716
San Diego Native
ParticipantThat $100K should have been $200K–although my parents did buy in Sunset Cliffs for $80K. Many people in those areas bought up lots of property and gave it to their kids when they got older. Just passing along the facts.
April 30, 2008 at 2:44 PM #196747ParticipantThat $100K should have been $200K–although my parents did buy in Sunset Cliffs for $80K. Many people in those areas bought up lots of property and gave it to their kids when they got older. Just passing along the facts.
April 30, 2008 at 2:44 PM #196772ParticipantThat $100K should have been $200K–although my parents did buy in Sunset Cliffs for $80K. Many people in those areas bought up lots of property and gave it to their kids when they got older. Just passing along the facts.
April 30, 2008 at 2:44 PM #196795ParticipantThat $100K should have been $200K–although my parents did buy in Sunset Cliffs for $80K. Many people in those areas bought up lots of property and gave it to their kids when they got older. Just passing along the facts.
April 30, 2008 at 2:44 PM #196834ParticipantThat $100K should have been $200K–although my parents did buy in Sunset Cliffs for $80K. Many people in those areas bought up lots of property and gave it to their kids when they got older. Just passing along the facts.
April 30, 2008 at 2:48 PM #196726JWM in SD
ParticipantYes, that’s nice SDN…let’s just hope that not too many of them extracted all of their “equity” during the boom years or loaded up on reverse mortgages for “retirement”.
April 30, 2008 at 2:48 PM #196757ParticipantYes, that’s nice SDN…let’s just hope that not too many of them extracted all of their “equity” during the boom years or loaded up on reverse mortgages for “retirement”.
April 30, 2008 at 2:48 PM #196782ParticipantYes, that’s nice SDN…let’s just hope that not too many of them extracted all of their “equity” during the boom years or loaded up on reverse mortgages for “retirement”.
April 30, 2008 at 2:48 PM #196806ParticipantYes, that’s nice SDN…let’s just hope that not too many of them extracted all of their “equity” during the boom years or loaded up on reverse mortgages for “retirement”.
April 30, 2008 at 2:48 PM #196844ParticipantYes, that’s nice SDN…let’s just hope that not too many of them extracted all of their “equity” during the boom years or loaded up on reverse mortgages for “retirement”.
April 30, 2008 at 3:01 PM #196746ParticipantNot one that we know. I realize the media reports that kind of financial irresponsiblity runs rampant, but everyone we know is ultra-conservative–no HELOC’S–most still too young for reverse mortgages–and pretty much on track for retirement. My wife and I are 42, and we see these folks as great examples.
April 30, 2008 at 3:01 PM #196778ParticipantNot one that we know. I realize the media reports that kind of financial irresponsiblity runs rampant, but everyone we know is ultra-conservative–no HELOC’S–most still too young for reverse mortgages–and pretty much on track for retirement. My wife and I are 42, and we see these folks as great examples.
April 30, 2008 at 3:01 PM #196803ParticipantNot one that we know. I realize the media reports that kind of financial irresponsiblity runs rampant, but everyone we know is ultra-conservative–no HELOC’S–most still too young for reverse mortgages–and pretty much on track for retirement. My wife and I are 42, and we see these folks as great examples.
April 30, 2008 at 3:01 PM #196826ParticipantNot one that we know. I realize the media reports that kind of financial irresponsiblity runs rampant, but everyone we know is ultra-conservative–no HELOC’S–most still too young for reverse mortgages–and pretty much on track for retirement. My wife and I are 42, and we see these folks as great examples.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.