- This topic has 522 replies, 27 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 2 months ago by
CAwireman.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 21, 2008 at 11:25 AM #259777August 21, 2008 at 11:36 AM #259503
(former)FormerSanDiegan
Participantsome of you are blaming Schiff for not getting the right time-frame?
Please, where’s the logical reasoning???
It’s really quite simple. Time = $.
Last week I predicted we were at the bottom of the housing market in San Diego. If prices decline for the next 4 years and by another 40% I will be precisely as accurate as Schiff.
August 21, 2008 at 11:36 AM #259696(former)FormerSanDiegan
Participantsome of you are blaming Schiff for not getting the right time-frame?
Please, where’s the logical reasoning???
It’s really quite simple. Time = $.
Last week I predicted we were at the bottom of the housing market in San Diego. If prices decline for the next 4 years and by another 40% I will be precisely as accurate as Schiff.
August 21, 2008 at 11:36 AM #259709(former)FormerSanDiegan
Participantsome of you are blaming Schiff for not getting the right time-frame?
Please, where’s the logical reasoning???
It’s really quite simple. Time = $.
Last week I predicted we were at the bottom of the housing market in San Diego. If prices decline for the next 4 years and by another 40% I will be precisely as accurate as Schiff.
August 21, 2008 at 11:36 AM #259759(former)FormerSanDiegan
Participantsome of you are blaming Schiff for not getting the right time-frame?
Please, where’s the logical reasoning???
It’s really quite simple. Time = $.
Last week I predicted we were at the bottom of the housing market in San Diego. If prices decline for the next 4 years and by another 40% I will be precisely as accurate as Schiff.
August 21, 2008 at 11:36 AM #259799(former)FormerSanDiegan
Participantsome of you are blaming Schiff for not getting the right time-frame?
Please, where’s the logical reasoning???
It’s really quite simple. Time = $.
Last week I predicted we were at the bottom of the housing market in San Diego. If prices decline for the next 4 years and by another 40% I will be precisely as accurate as Schiff.
August 21, 2008 at 12:01 PM #259518kewp
ParticipantLast week I predicted we were at the bottom of the housing market in San Diego. If prices decline for the next 4 years and by another 40% I will be precisely as accurate as Schiff.
Uh, Schiff never said we were at a market top or bottom. He’ll say he doesn’t know if you ask him about specific time frames, which is something I very much respect about the man. He merely pointed out that the market was in an unsustainable rally.
Anyone that could conclusively predict market tops and bottoms would be a multi-billionaire in short order.
And unless you sold in SD at the top and are renting or moved to a cheaper part of the country, your “timing” was no better.
August 21, 2008 at 12:01 PM #259711kewp
ParticipantLast week I predicted we were at the bottom of the housing market in San Diego. If prices decline for the next 4 years and by another 40% I will be precisely as accurate as Schiff.
Uh, Schiff never said we were at a market top or bottom. He’ll say he doesn’t know if you ask him about specific time frames, which is something I very much respect about the man. He merely pointed out that the market was in an unsustainable rally.
Anyone that could conclusively predict market tops and bottoms would be a multi-billionaire in short order.
And unless you sold in SD at the top and are renting or moved to a cheaper part of the country, your “timing” was no better.
August 21, 2008 at 12:01 PM #259724kewp
ParticipantLast week I predicted we were at the bottom of the housing market in San Diego. If prices decline for the next 4 years and by another 40% I will be precisely as accurate as Schiff.
Uh, Schiff never said we were at a market top or bottom. He’ll say he doesn’t know if you ask him about specific time frames, which is something I very much respect about the man. He merely pointed out that the market was in an unsustainable rally.
Anyone that could conclusively predict market tops and bottoms would be a multi-billionaire in short order.
And unless you sold in SD at the top and are renting or moved to a cheaper part of the country, your “timing” was no better.
August 21, 2008 at 12:01 PM #259773kewp
ParticipantLast week I predicted we were at the bottom of the housing market in San Diego. If prices decline for the next 4 years and by another 40% I will be precisely as accurate as Schiff.
Uh, Schiff never said we were at a market top or bottom. He’ll say he doesn’t know if you ask him about specific time frames, which is something I very much respect about the man. He merely pointed out that the market was in an unsustainable rally.
Anyone that could conclusively predict market tops and bottoms would be a multi-billionaire in short order.
And unless you sold in SD at the top and are renting or moved to a cheaper part of the country, your “timing” was no better.
August 21, 2008 at 12:01 PM #259813kewp
ParticipantLast week I predicted we were at the bottom of the housing market in San Diego. If prices decline for the next 4 years and by another 40% I will be precisely as accurate as Schiff.
Uh, Schiff never said we were at a market top or bottom. He’ll say he doesn’t know if you ask him about specific time frames, which is something I very much respect about the man. He merely pointed out that the market was in an unsustainable rally.
Anyone that could conclusively predict market tops and bottoms would be a multi-billionaire in short order.
And unless you sold in SD at the top and are renting or moved to a cheaper part of the country, your “timing” was no better.
August 21, 2008 at 12:29 PM #259528(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantKewp, your point is simply a matter of semantics, so I will issue a correction.
OK. Correction: “I will be just as accurate as those calling a top in 2001.”
Schiff was bearish in 2001, but technically was not calling a top in prices.
If someone was bullish on stocks in late 2001 and said that they were in an unsustainable bear run :
Would you say that they got it wrong ?
Or
Would you say that they were simply early on their prescient call, since stocks did stage a huge rally starting in March 2003 ?
August 21, 2008 at 12:29 PM #259721(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantKewp, your point is simply a matter of semantics, so I will issue a correction.
OK. Correction: “I will be just as accurate as those calling a top in 2001.”
Schiff was bearish in 2001, but technically was not calling a top in prices.
If someone was bullish on stocks in late 2001 and said that they were in an unsustainable bear run :
Would you say that they got it wrong ?
Or
Would you say that they were simply early on their prescient call, since stocks did stage a huge rally starting in March 2003 ?
August 21, 2008 at 12:29 PM #259734(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantKewp, your point is simply a matter of semantics, so I will issue a correction.
OK. Correction: “I will be just as accurate as those calling a top in 2001.”
Schiff was bearish in 2001, but technically was not calling a top in prices.
If someone was bullish on stocks in late 2001 and said that they were in an unsustainable bear run :
Would you say that they got it wrong ?
Or
Would you say that they were simply early on their prescient call, since stocks did stage a huge rally starting in March 2003 ?
August 21, 2008 at 12:29 PM #259784(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantKewp, your point is simply a matter of semantics, so I will issue a correction.
OK. Correction: “I will be just as accurate as those calling a top in 2001.”
Schiff was bearish in 2001, but technically was not calling a top in prices.
If someone was bullish on stocks in late 2001 and said that they were in an unsustainable bear run :
Would you say that they got it wrong ?
Or
Would you say that they were simply early on their prescient call, since stocks did stage a huge rally starting in March 2003 ?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.