- This topic has 405 replies, 26 voices, and was last updated 16 years ago by
an.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 14, 2008 at 9:55 PM #204458May 14, 2008 at 10:53 PM #204357
Anonymous
Guest“Why? Because there are enough backward-ass, redneck, bible humping, hillbillies in the south and throughout the country (probably even in SD) that would fear anyone that has any suspect muslim blood (real or not). All it would take would be some al qaeda looking dude (real or not) appearing on a web broadcast endorsing obama as a “brother”, and that would strike enough fear in these hillbillies to vote against him. In fact, that would be a perfect campaign strategy for the republicans to use..”
Obama isn’t a muslim. It would be an ignorant campaign strategy geared towards ignorant people. The educated and intelligent aren’t concerned with lies.
“Pat Buchanan said today that WV voters are called “racist” hillbillies, but 95% black voters voting for Obama is not questioned.”
Why should it be questioned? This country has had nothing but white presidents for over 200 years? Perhaps we want to see a qualified minority or woman have a chance. I don’t see anything racist about that. Obama is a quality candidate with a great vision. I wouldn’t vote for a black GW Bush.
May 14, 2008 at 10:53 PM #204405Guest“Why? Because there are enough backward-ass, redneck, bible humping, hillbillies in the south and throughout the country (probably even in SD) that would fear anyone that has any suspect muslim blood (real or not). All it would take would be some al qaeda looking dude (real or not) appearing on a web broadcast endorsing obama as a “brother”, and that would strike enough fear in these hillbillies to vote against him. In fact, that would be a perfect campaign strategy for the republicans to use..”
Obama isn’t a muslim. It would be an ignorant campaign strategy geared towards ignorant people. The educated and intelligent aren’t concerned with lies.
“Pat Buchanan said today that WV voters are called “racist” hillbillies, but 95% black voters voting for Obama is not questioned.”
Why should it be questioned? This country has had nothing but white presidents for over 200 years? Perhaps we want to see a qualified minority or woman have a chance. I don’t see anything racist about that. Obama is a quality candidate with a great vision. I wouldn’t vote for a black GW Bush.
May 14, 2008 at 10:53 PM #204433Guest“Why? Because there are enough backward-ass, redneck, bible humping, hillbillies in the south and throughout the country (probably even in SD) that would fear anyone that has any suspect muslim blood (real or not). All it would take would be some al qaeda looking dude (real or not) appearing on a web broadcast endorsing obama as a “brother”, and that would strike enough fear in these hillbillies to vote against him. In fact, that would be a perfect campaign strategy for the republicans to use..”
Obama isn’t a muslim. It would be an ignorant campaign strategy geared towards ignorant people. The educated and intelligent aren’t concerned with lies.
“Pat Buchanan said today that WV voters are called “racist” hillbillies, but 95% black voters voting for Obama is not questioned.”
Why should it be questioned? This country has had nothing but white presidents for over 200 years? Perhaps we want to see a qualified minority or woman have a chance. I don’t see anything racist about that. Obama is a quality candidate with a great vision. I wouldn’t vote for a black GW Bush.
May 14, 2008 at 10:53 PM #204456Guest“Why? Because there are enough backward-ass, redneck, bible humping, hillbillies in the south and throughout the country (probably even in SD) that would fear anyone that has any suspect muslim blood (real or not). All it would take would be some al qaeda looking dude (real or not) appearing on a web broadcast endorsing obama as a “brother”, and that would strike enough fear in these hillbillies to vote against him. In fact, that would be a perfect campaign strategy for the republicans to use..”
Obama isn’t a muslim. It would be an ignorant campaign strategy geared towards ignorant people. The educated and intelligent aren’t concerned with lies.
“Pat Buchanan said today that WV voters are called “racist” hillbillies, but 95% black voters voting for Obama is not questioned.”
Why should it be questioned? This country has had nothing but white presidents for over 200 years? Perhaps we want to see a qualified minority or woman have a chance. I don’t see anything racist about that. Obama is a quality candidate with a great vision. I wouldn’t vote for a black GW Bush.
May 14, 2008 at 10:53 PM #204488Guest“Why? Because there are enough backward-ass, redneck, bible humping, hillbillies in the south and throughout the country (probably even in SD) that would fear anyone that has any suspect muslim blood (real or not). All it would take would be some al qaeda looking dude (real or not) appearing on a web broadcast endorsing obama as a “brother”, and that would strike enough fear in these hillbillies to vote against him. In fact, that would be a perfect campaign strategy for the republicans to use..”
Obama isn’t a muslim. It would be an ignorant campaign strategy geared towards ignorant people. The educated and intelligent aren’t concerned with lies.
“Pat Buchanan said today that WV voters are called “racist” hillbillies, but 95% black voters voting for Obama is not questioned.”
Why should it be questioned? This country has had nothing but white presidents for over 200 years? Perhaps we want to see a qualified minority or woman have a chance. I don’t see anything racist about that. Obama is a quality candidate with a great vision. I wouldn’t vote for a black GW Bush.
May 14, 2008 at 11:16 PM #204382an
ParticipantWhy should it be questioned? This country has had nothing but white presidents for over 200 years? Perhaps we want to see a qualified minority or woman have a chance. I don’t see anything racist about that. Obama is a quality candidate with a great vision. I wouldn’t vote for a black GW Bush.
Because it’s two peas from the same pod. Have you ever seen any group of people (same race) have an agreement rate of 90+% on anything? If it’s not the color of his skin, can you please tell me what is it about Obama that appeal to 90+% of the black votes and not even 50% of the white votes?
May 14, 2008 at 11:16 PM #204430ParticipantWhy should it be questioned? This country has had nothing but white presidents for over 200 years? Perhaps we want to see a qualified minority or woman have a chance. I don’t see anything racist about that. Obama is a quality candidate with a great vision. I wouldn’t vote for a black GW Bush.
Because it’s two peas from the same pod. Have you ever seen any group of people (same race) have an agreement rate of 90+% on anything? If it’s not the color of his skin, can you please tell me what is it about Obama that appeal to 90+% of the black votes and not even 50% of the white votes?
May 14, 2008 at 11:16 PM #204459ParticipantWhy should it be questioned? This country has had nothing but white presidents for over 200 years? Perhaps we want to see a qualified minority or woman have a chance. I don’t see anything racist about that. Obama is a quality candidate with a great vision. I wouldn’t vote for a black GW Bush.
Because it’s two peas from the same pod. Have you ever seen any group of people (same race) have an agreement rate of 90+% on anything? If it’s not the color of his skin, can you please tell me what is it about Obama that appeal to 90+% of the black votes and not even 50% of the white votes?
May 14, 2008 at 11:16 PM #204481ParticipantWhy should it be questioned? This country has had nothing but white presidents for over 200 years? Perhaps we want to see a qualified minority or woman have a chance. I don’t see anything racist about that. Obama is a quality candidate with a great vision. I wouldn’t vote for a black GW Bush.
Because it’s two peas from the same pod. Have you ever seen any group of people (same race) have an agreement rate of 90+% on anything? If it’s not the color of his skin, can you please tell me what is it about Obama that appeal to 90+% of the black votes and not even 50% of the white votes?
May 14, 2008 at 11:16 PM #204513ParticipantWhy should it be questioned? This country has had nothing but white presidents for over 200 years? Perhaps we want to see a qualified minority or woman have a chance. I don’t see anything racist about that. Obama is a quality candidate with a great vision. I wouldn’t vote for a black GW Bush.
Because it’s two peas from the same pod. Have you ever seen any group of people (same race) have an agreement rate of 90+% on anything? If it’s not the color of his skin, can you please tell me what is it about Obama that appeal to 90+% of the black votes and not even 50% of the white votes?
May 15, 2008 at 12:28 AM #204427GuestIt’s his character Asianautica, what he stands for, his vision for the country.
I’m not denying that a lot of black people want to see a black president in their lifetime, but If he were a black Bush, I think it’s safe to say you wouldn’t be seeing the 90%.
Regarding Obama not being as popular with white voters, we all know there are a large number of white racists in this country. That may have something to do with it. In spite of that, Obama is doing well.
Asianautica, do you think if Obama were Idi Amin he would get the majority of the black vote?..
May 15, 2008 at 12:28 AM #204475GuestIt’s his character Asianautica, what he stands for, his vision for the country.
I’m not denying that a lot of black people want to see a black president in their lifetime, but If he were a black Bush, I think it’s safe to say you wouldn’t be seeing the 90%.
Regarding Obama not being as popular with white voters, we all know there are a large number of white racists in this country. That may have something to do with it. In spite of that, Obama is doing well.
Asianautica, do you think if Obama were Idi Amin he would get the majority of the black vote?..
May 15, 2008 at 12:28 AM #204504GuestIt’s his character Asianautica, what he stands for, his vision for the country.
I’m not denying that a lot of black people want to see a black president in their lifetime, but If he were a black Bush, I think it’s safe to say you wouldn’t be seeing the 90%.
Regarding Obama not being as popular with white voters, we all know there are a large number of white racists in this country. That may have something to do with it. In spite of that, Obama is doing well.
Asianautica, do you think if Obama were Idi Amin he would get the majority of the black vote?..
May 15, 2008 at 12:28 AM #204527GuestIt’s his character Asianautica, what he stands for, his vision for the country.
I’m not denying that a lot of black people want to see a black president in their lifetime, but If he were a black Bush, I think it’s safe to say you wouldn’t be seeing the 90%.
Regarding Obama not being as popular with white voters, we all know there are a large number of white racists in this country. That may have something to do with it. In spite of that, Obama is doing well.
Asianautica, do you think if Obama were Idi Amin he would get the majority of the black vote?..
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.