- This topic has 50 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 2 months ago by
svelte.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 23, 2011 at 8:43 AM #18651March 23, 2011 at 9:08 AM #679920
outtamojo
ParticipantNow, there’s a guy that’s gonna be alone and watching porn on an ipad…
March 23, 2011 at 9:08 AM #679974ParticipantNow, there’s a guy that’s gonna be alone and watching porn on an ipad…
March 23, 2011 at 9:08 AM #680590ParticipantNow, there’s a guy that’s gonna be alone and watching porn on an ipad…
March 23, 2011 at 9:08 AM #680727ParticipantNow, there’s a guy that’s gonna be alone and watching porn on an ipad…
March 23, 2011 at 9:08 AM #681081ParticipantNow, there’s a guy that’s gonna be alone and watching porn on an ipad…
March 23, 2011 at 9:51 AM #679955UCGal
ParticipantSure I see the humor in all of that.
But seriously – iPads are a big enough expense that unless you are wealthy, you probably should consult your spouse.
Our household rule of thumb is no purchases over $200 without at least a mention to the spouse. An iPad would qualify.
You’re single, you are the only one making claims on your money. It’s different when you’re balancing the needs of more than one person on a budget.
March 23, 2011 at 9:51 AM #680009ParticipantSure I see the humor in all of that.
But seriously – iPads are a big enough expense that unless you are wealthy, you probably should consult your spouse.
Our household rule of thumb is no purchases over $200 without at least a mention to the spouse. An iPad would qualify.
You’re single, you are the only one making claims on your money. It’s different when you’re balancing the needs of more than one person on a budget.
March 23, 2011 at 9:51 AM #680625ParticipantSure I see the humor in all of that.
But seriously – iPads are a big enough expense that unless you are wealthy, you probably should consult your spouse.
Our household rule of thumb is no purchases over $200 without at least a mention to the spouse. An iPad would qualify.
You’re single, you are the only one making claims on your money. It’s different when you’re balancing the needs of more than one person on a budget.
March 23, 2011 at 9:51 AM #680762ParticipantSure I see the humor in all of that.
But seriously – iPads are a big enough expense that unless you are wealthy, you probably should consult your spouse.
Our household rule of thumb is no purchases over $200 without at least a mention to the spouse. An iPad would qualify.
You’re single, you are the only one making claims on your money. It’s different when you’re balancing the needs of more than one person on a budget.
March 23, 2011 at 9:51 AM #681116ParticipantSure I see the humor in all of that.
But seriously – iPads are a big enough expense that unless you are wealthy, you probably should consult your spouse.
Our household rule of thumb is no purchases over $200 without at least a mention to the spouse. An iPad would qualify.
You’re single, you are the only one making claims on your money. It’s different when you’re balancing the needs of more than one person on a budget.
March 23, 2011 at 10:16 AM #679970Ren
ParticipantAgreed – it’s a respect and partnership issue, not a “who wears the pants” issue. I can buy a xoom if I want, but I wouldn’t do it without discussing the need with my wife.
March 23, 2011 at 10:16 AM #680024ParticipantAgreed – it’s a respect and partnership issue, not a “who wears the pants” issue. I can buy a xoom if I want, but I wouldn’t do it without discussing the need with my wife.
March 23, 2011 at 10:16 AM #680640ParticipantAgreed – it’s a respect and partnership issue, not a “who wears the pants” issue. I can buy a xoom if I want, but I wouldn’t do it without discussing the need with my wife.
March 23, 2011 at 10:16 AM #680777ParticipantAgreed – it’s a respect and partnership issue, not a “who wears the pants” issue. I can buy a xoom if I want, but I wouldn’t do it without discussing the need with my wife.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.