- This topic has 240 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 4 months ago by
afx114.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 25, 2008 at 7:15 PM #13964September 25, 2008 at 7:22 PM #275421
Eugene
ParticipantFrom blog comments:
“Eight years of Bush have not been kind to science. And given the challenges we are facing (e.g., how to sustain well over 6 billion people without destroying our planet), this is not the time to short-change the scientific enterprise. Sadly, there is much evidence that McCain will carry on the Republican trend. Picking a running-mate that believes the Earth is 3000 years old, and that humans have nothing to do with global warming, does not inspire confidence.”
September 25, 2008 at 7:22 PM #275673ParticipantFrom blog comments:
“Eight years of Bush have not been kind to science. And given the challenges we are facing (e.g., how to sustain well over 6 billion people without destroying our planet), this is not the time to short-change the scientific enterprise. Sadly, there is much evidence that McCain will carry on the Republican trend. Picking a running-mate that believes the Earth is 3000 years old, and that humans have nothing to do with global warming, does not inspire confidence.”
September 25, 2008 at 7:22 PM #275675ParticipantFrom blog comments:
“Eight years of Bush have not been kind to science. And given the challenges we are facing (e.g., how to sustain well over 6 billion people without destroying our planet), this is not the time to short-change the scientific enterprise. Sadly, there is much evidence that McCain will carry on the Republican trend. Picking a running-mate that believes the Earth is 3000 years old, and that humans have nothing to do with global warming, does not inspire confidence.”
September 25, 2008 at 7:22 PM #275724ParticipantFrom blog comments:
“Eight years of Bush have not been kind to science. And given the challenges we are facing (e.g., how to sustain well over 6 billion people without destroying our planet), this is not the time to short-change the scientific enterprise. Sadly, there is much evidence that McCain will carry on the Republican trend. Picking a running-mate that believes the Earth is 3000 years old, and that humans have nothing to do with global warming, does not inspire confidence.”
September 25, 2008 at 7:22 PM #275742ParticipantFrom blog comments:
“Eight years of Bush have not been kind to science. And given the challenges we are facing (e.g., how to sustain well over 6 billion people without destroying our planet), this is not the time to short-change the scientific enterprise. Sadly, there is much evidence that McCain will carry on the Republican trend. Picking a running-mate that believes the Earth is 3000 years old, and that humans have nothing to do with global warming, does not inspire confidence.”
September 25, 2008 at 9:45 PM #275521nostradamus
ParticipantCheck these out. If it wasn’t so scary to live in a country that might elect her, it would be funny.
On Foreign Policy
On the Bush Doctrine
September 25, 2008 at 9:45 PM #275773ParticipantCheck these out. If it wasn’t so scary to live in a country that might elect her, it would be funny.
On Foreign Policy
On the Bush Doctrine
September 25, 2008 at 9:45 PM #275775ParticipantCheck these out. If it wasn’t so scary to live in a country that might elect her, it would be funny.
On Foreign Policy
On the Bush Doctrine
September 25, 2008 at 9:45 PM #275824ParticipantCheck these out. If it wasn’t so scary to live in a country that might elect her, it would be funny.
On Foreign Policy
On the Bush Doctrine
September 25, 2008 at 9:45 PM #275840ParticipantCheck these out. If it wasn’t so scary to live in a country that might elect her, it would be funny.
On Foreign Policy
On the Bush Doctrine
September 25, 2008 at 9:45 PM #275526patientlywaiting
ParticipantI liked the Year 2000 McCain much better.
I’ll be voting for Obama since of the two, he’s clearly the superior choice.
September 25, 2008 at 9:45 PM #275778ParticipantI liked the Year 2000 McCain much better.
I’ll be voting for Obama since of the two, he’s clearly the superior choice.
September 25, 2008 at 9:45 PM #275780ParticipantI liked the Year 2000 McCain much better.
I’ll be voting for Obama since of the two, he’s clearly the superior choice.
September 25, 2008 at 9:45 PM #275829ParticipantI liked the Year 2000 McCain much better.
I’ll be voting for Obama since of the two, he’s clearly the superior choice.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.