- This topic has 570 replies, 33 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 1 month ago by briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 30, 2010 at 6:05 PM #612379September 30, 2010 at 6:08 PM #611328enron_by_the_seaParticipant
So let us get this discussion back to something substantive.
Imagine this scenario in November 2010
[1] Prop 25 passes allowing 50% vote for passage of budget – but as it is alleged, it contains a backdoor for tax hikes disguised as fees.
and/or
[2] Dems pick up 3 seats in state assembly and 2 seat in state senate (This is easy because Abel Maldonado’s seat is open). This gives them 2/3 vote in house and senate to do whatever they want.
[3] People are screaming pass the budget, so it gets passed with increased taxes or fees depending on [1] or [2]
Who do you want your governor to be?
September 30, 2010 at 6:08 PM #611413enron_by_the_seaParticipantSo let us get this discussion back to something substantive.
Imagine this scenario in November 2010
[1] Prop 25 passes allowing 50% vote for passage of budget – but as it is alleged, it contains a backdoor for tax hikes disguised as fees.
and/or
[2] Dems pick up 3 seats in state assembly and 2 seat in state senate (This is easy because Abel Maldonado’s seat is open). This gives them 2/3 vote in house and senate to do whatever they want.
[3] People are screaming pass the budget, so it gets passed with increased taxes or fees depending on [1] or [2]
Who do you want your governor to be?
September 30, 2010 at 6:08 PM #611962enron_by_the_seaParticipantSo let us get this discussion back to something substantive.
Imagine this scenario in November 2010
[1] Prop 25 passes allowing 50% vote for passage of budget – but as it is alleged, it contains a backdoor for tax hikes disguised as fees.
and/or
[2] Dems pick up 3 seats in state assembly and 2 seat in state senate (This is easy because Abel Maldonado’s seat is open). This gives them 2/3 vote in house and senate to do whatever they want.
[3] People are screaming pass the budget, so it gets passed with increased taxes or fees depending on [1] or [2]
Who do you want your governor to be?
September 30, 2010 at 6:08 PM #612076enron_by_the_seaParticipantSo let us get this discussion back to something substantive.
Imagine this scenario in November 2010
[1] Prop 25 passes allowing 50% vote for passage of budget – but as it is alleged, it contains a backdoor for tax hikes disguised as fees.
and/or
[2] Dems pick up 3 seats in state assembly and 2 seat in state senate (This is easy because Abel Maldonado’s seat is open). This gives them 2/3 vote in house and senate to do whatever they want.
[3] People are screaming pass the budget, so it gets passed with increased taxes or fees depending on [1] or [2]
Who do you want your governor to be?
September 30, 2010 at 6:08 PM #612389enron_by_the_seaParticipantSo let us get this discussion back to something substantive.
Imagine this scenario in November 2010
[1] Prop 25 passes allowing 50% vote for passage of budget – but as it is alleged, it contains a backdoor for tax hikes disguised as fees.
and/or
[2] Dems pick up 3 seats in state assembly and 2 seat in state senate (This is easy because Abel Maldonado’s seat is open). This gives them 2/3 vote in house and senate to do whatever they want.
[3] People are screaming pass the budget, so it gets passed with increased taxes or fees depending on [1] or [2]
Who do you want your governor to be?
September 30, 2010 at 7:27 PM #611338Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=investor][quote=BigGovernmentIsGood]Brian,
Thanks for the information. It’s obvious that Whitman would have this person deported if she could. If Whitman is treating a loyal servant who worked for her for 9 years like garbage, imagine how she will treat the common California voter.
Hopefully California voters will have the good sense not to vote into office someone who would only represent the top 0.0001% of income earners while treating the rest of us like her own personal trash can.[/quote]
BGIG: The reason why this is coming out is to influence the election against whitman. You are falling for propaganda BGIG. Unless of course, you don’t want whitman and all you care about is stopping whitman, not putting reports into perspective.[/quote]Investor: BigGubment isn’t falling for the propaganda at all, he’s spreading it. If you haven’t noticed, he hasn’t responded to a single post attacking his lack of facts, or his clear Leftist slant.
This has nothing to do with Whitman and everything to do with a pre-planned smear on a GOP candidate.
September 30, 2010 at 7:27 PM #611423Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=investor][quote=BigGovernmentIsGood]Brian,
Thanks for the information. It’s obvious that Whitman would have this person deported if she could. If Whitman is treating a loyal servant who worked for her for 9 years like garbage, imagine how she will treat the common California voter.
Hopefully California voters will have the good sense not to vote into office someone who would only represent the top 0.0001% of income earners while treating the rest of us like her own personal trash can.[/quote]
BGIG: The reason why this is coming out is to influence the election against whitman. You are falling for propaganda BGIG. Unless of course, you don’t want whitman and all you care about is stopping whitman, not putting reports into perspective.[/quote]Investor: BigGubment isn’t falling for the propaganda at all, he’s spreading it. If you haven’t noticed, he hasn’t responded to a single post attacking his lack of facts, or his clear Leftist slant.
This has nothing to do with Whitman and everything to do with a pre-planned smear on a GOP candidate.
September 30, 2010 at 7:27 PM #611972Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=investor][quote=BigGovernmentIsGood]Brian,
Thanks for the information. It’s obvious that Whitman would have this person deported if she could. If Whitman is treating a loyal servant who worked for her for 9 years like garbage, imagine how she will treat the common California voter.
Hopefully California voters will have the good sense not to vote into office someone who would only represent the top 0.0001% of income earners while treating the rest of us like her own personal trash can.[/quote]
BGIG: The reason why this is coming out is to influence the election against whitman. You are falling for propaganda BGIG. Unless of course, you don’t want whitman and all you care about is stopping whitman, not putting reports into perspective.[/quote]Investor: BigGubment isn’t falling for the propaganda at all, he’s spreading it. If you haven’t noticed, he hasn’t responded to a single post attacking his lack of facts, or his clear Leftist slant.
This has nothing to do with Whitman and everything to do with a pre-planned smear on a GOP candidate.
September 30, 2010 at 7:27 PM #612086Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=investor][quote=BigGovernmentIsGood]Brian,
Thanks for the information. It’s obvious that Whitman would have this person deported if she could. If Whitman is treating a loyal servant who worked for her for 9 years like garbage, imagine how she will treat the common California voter.
Hopefully California voters will have the good sense not to vote into office someone who would only represent the top 0.0001% of income earners while treating the rest of us like her own personal trash can.[/quote]
BGIG: The reason why this is coming out is to influence the election against whitman. You are falling for propaganda BGIG. Unless of course, you don’t want whitman and all you care about is stopping whitman, not putting reports into perspective.[/quote]Investor: BigGubment isn’t falling for the propaganda at all, he’s spreading it. If you haven’t noticed, he hasn’t responded to a single post attacking his lack of facts, or his clear Leftist slant.
This has nothing to do with Whitman and everything to do with a pre-planned smear on a GOP candidate.
September 30, 2010 at 7:27 PM #612399Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=investor][quote=BigGovernmentIsGood]Brian,
Thanks for the information. It’s obvious that Whitman would have this person deported if she could. If Whitman is treating a loyal servant who worked for her for 9 years like garbage, imagine how she will treat the common California voter.
Hopefully California voters will have the good sense not to vote into office someone who would only represent the top 0.0001% of income earners while treating the rest of us like her own personal trash can.[/quote]
BGIG: The reason why this is coming out is to influence the election against whitman. You are falling for propaganda BGIG. Unless of course, you don’t want whitman and all you care about is stopping whitman, not putting reports into perspective.[/quote]Investor: BigGubment isn’t falling for the propaganda at all, he’s spreading it. If you haven’t noticed, he hasn’t responded to a single post attacking his lack of facts, or his clear Leftist slant.
This has nothing to do with Whitman and everything to do with a pre-planned smear on a GOP candidate.
September 30, 2010 at 7:33 PM #611343carlsbadworkerParticipantFinally a relevant post. You’re right on.
Who care about this whole drama? The election is really a fight between public employee and tax payer. In a budget crisis, if you can’t print money (or in US government’s case, you can’t print money fast enough), it is either a reduced pay/benefit/pension for public employee or to increase tax. I see no other way out of it.
All other things are just noises, ignore them.
[quote=enron_by_the_sea]So let us get this discussion back to something substantive.
Imagine this scenario in November 2010
[1] Prop 25 passes allowing 50% vote for passage of budget – but as it is alleged, it contains a backdoor for tax hikes disguised as fees.
and/or
[2] Dems pick up 3 seats in state assembly and 2 seat in state senate (This is easy because Abel Maldonado’s seat is open). This gives them 2/3 vote in house and senate to do whatever they want.
[3] People are screaming pass the budget, so it gets passed with increased taxes or fees depending on [1] or [2]
Who do you want your governor to be?[/quote]
September 30, 2010 at 7:33 PM #611428carlsbadworkerParticipantFinally a relevant post. You’re right on.
Who care about this whole drama? The election is really a fight between public employee and tax payer. In a budget crisis, if you can’t print money (or in US government’s case, you can’t print money fast enough), it is either a reduced pay/benefit/pension for public employee or to increase tax. I see no other way out of it.
All other things are just noises, ignore them.
[quote=enron_by_the_sea]So let us get this discussion back to something substantive.
Imagine this scenario in November 2010
[1] Prop 25 passes allowing 50% vote for passage of budget – but as it is alleged, it contains a backdoor for tax hikes disguised as fees.
and/or
[2] Dems pick up 3 seats in state assembly and 2 seat in state senate (This is easy because Abel Maldonado’s seat is open). This gives them 2/3 vote in house and senate to do whatever they want.
[3] People are screaming pass the budget, so it gets passed with increased taxes or fees depending on [1] or [2]
Who do you want your governor to be?[/quote]
September 30, 2010 at 7:33 PM #611977carlsbadworkerParticipantFinally a relevant post. You’re right on.
Who care about this whole drama? The election is really a fight between public employee and tax payer. In a budget crisis, if you can’t print money (or in US government’s case, you can’t print money fast enough), it is either a reduced pay/benefit/pension for public employee or to increase tax. I see no other way out of it.
All other things are just noises, ignore them.
[quote=enron_by_the_sea]So let us get this discussion back to something substantive.
Imagine this scenario in November 2010
[1] Prop 25 passes allowing 50% vote for passage of budget – but as it is alleged, it contains a backdoor for tax hikes disguised as fees.
and/or
[2] Dems pick up 3 seats in state assembly and 2 seat in state senate (This is easy because Abel Maldonado’s seat is open). This gives them 2/3 vote in house and senate to do whatever they want.
[3] People are screaming pass the budget, so it gets passed with increased taxes or fees depending on [1] or [2]
Who do you want your governor to be?[/quote]
September 30, 2010 at 7:33 PM #612090carlsbadworkerParticipantFinally a relevant post. You’re right on.
Who care about this whole drama? The election is really a fight between public employee and tax payer. In a budget crisis, if you can’t print money (or in US government’s case, you can’t print money fast enough), it is either a reduced pay/benefit/pension for public employee or to increase tax. I see no other way out of it.
All other things are just noises, ignore them.
[quote=enron_by_the_sea]So let us get this discussion back to something substantive.
Imagine this scenario in November 2010
[1] Prop 25 passes allowing 50% vote for passage of budget – but as it is alleged, it contains a backdoor for tax hikes disguised as fees.
and/or
[2] Dems pick up 3 seats in state assembly and 2 seat in state senate (This is easy because Abel Maldonado’s seat is open). This gives them 2/3 vote in house and senate to do whatever they want.
[3] People are screaming pass the budget, so it gets passed with increased taxes or fees depending on [1] or [2]
Who do you want your governor to be?[/quote]
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.