- This topic has 345 replies, 31 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 9 months ago by
Nor-LA-SD-guy.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 7, 2010 at 11:07 PM #577254July 8, 2010 at 5:42 AM #576256
Nor-LA-SD-guy
ParticipantThe Elsinore fault is a fairly quite fault with normally 250 years between ruptures; the last was in 1909 I think, very rare for anything over 6 points even at that. The San Jacinto fault on the other hand is the most active fault in Socal. but again most major quakes on this fault never exceed 6.5 the biggest on record I think was 7.2 (San Jacinto fault).
July 8, 2010 at 5:42 AM #576353ParticipantThe Elsinore fault is a fairly quite fault with normally 250 years between ruptures; the last was in 1909 I think, very rare for anything over 6 points even at that. The San Jacinto fault on the other hand is the most active fault in Socal. but again most major quakes on this fault never exceed 6.5 the biggest on record I think was 7.2 (San Jacinto fault).
July 8, 2010 at 5:42 AM #576877ParticipantThe Elsinore fault is a fairly quite fault with normally 250 years between ruptures; the last was in 1909 I think, very rare for anything over 6 points even at that. The San Jacinto fault on the other hand is the most active fault in Socal. but again most major quakes on this fault never exceed 6.5 the biggest on record I think was 7.2 (San Jacinto fault).
July 8, 2010 at 5:42 AM #576984ParticipantThe Elsinore fault is a fairly quite fault with normally 250 years between ruptures; the last was in 1909 I think, very rare for anything over 6 points even at that. The San Jacinto fault on the other hand is the most active fault in Socal. but again most major quakes on this fault never exceed 6.5 the biggest on record I think was 7.2 (San Jacinto fault).
July 8, 2010 at 5:42 AM #577284ParticipantThe Elsinore fault is a fairly quite fault with normally 250 years between ruptures; the last was in 1909 I think, very rare for anything over 6 points even at that. The San Jacinto fault on the other hand is the most active fault in Socal. but again most major quakes on this fault never exceed 6.5 the biggest on record I think was 7.2 (San Jacinto fault).
July 8, 2010 at 6:28 AM #576261ParticipantIt’s usually the faults no one has discovered yet that cause the most damage (ie.. the 94 Northridge and 1971 Sylmar quakes).
July 8, 2010 at 6:28 AM #576358ParticipantIt’s usually the faults no one has discovered yet that cause the most damage (ie.. the 94 Northridge and 1971 Sylmar quakes).
July 8, 2010 at 6:28 AM #576882ParticipantIt’s usually the faults no one has discovered yet that cause the most damage (ie.. the 94 Northridge and 1971 Sylmar quakes).
July 8, 2010 at 6:28 AM #576989ParticipantIt’s usually the faults no one has discovered yet that cause the most damage (ie.. the 94 Northridge and 1971 Sylmar quakes).
July 8, 2010 at 6:28 AM #577289ParticipantIt’s usually the faults no one has discovered yet that cause the most damage (ie.. the 94 Northridge and 1971 Sylmar quakes).
July 8, 2010 at 7:20 AM #576266
svelteParticipantIt was fast and sharp in north county. I thought a truck hit the building at first.
The others I have taken in stride, but that one shook me up a bit.
July 8, 2010 at 7:20 AM #576363svelteParticipantIt was fast and sharp in north county. I thought a truck hit the building at first.
The others I have taken in stride, but that one shook me up a bit.
July 8, 2010 at 7:20 AM #576887svelteParticipantIt was fast and sharp in north county. I thought a truck hit the building at first.
The others I have taken in stride, but that one shook me up a bit.
July 8, 2010 at 7:20 AM #576994svelteParticipantIt was fast and sharp in north county. I thought a truck hit the building at first.
The others I have taken in stride, but that one shook me up a bit.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.