- This topic has 170 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 6 months ago by ocrenter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 28, 2010 at 10:17 AM #646327December 28, 2010 at 10:22 AM #645217AnonymousGuest
Which proves the bigger point here that the Dream Act is a whole lot of nothing. If it were enacted, probably would have very minimal impact other than the pro illegal immigration crowd could claim a short term victory in their fight towards the real goals which are amnesty for all undocumented and eventually fully open borders.
December 28, 2010 at 10:22 AM #645288AnonymousGuestWhich proves the bigger point here that the Dream Act is a whole lot of nothing. If it were enacted, probably would have very minimal impact other than the pro illegal immigration crowd could claim a short term victory in their fight towards the real goals which are amnesty for all undocumented and eventually fully open borders.
December 28, 2010 at 10:22 AM #645870AnonymousGuestWhich proves the bigger point here that the Dream Act is a whole lot of nothing. If it were enacted, probably would have very minimal impact other than the pro illegal immigration crowd could claim a short term victory in their fight towards the real goals which are amnesty for all undocumented and eventually fully open borders.
December 28, 2010 at 10:22 AM #646007AnonymousGuestWhich proves the bigger point here that the Dream Act is a whole lot of nothing. If it were enacted, probably would have very minimal impact other than the pro illegal immigration crowd could claim a short term victory in their fight towards the real goals which are amnesty for all undocumented and eventually fully open borders.
December 28, 2010 at 10:22 AM #646332AnonymousGuestWhich proves the bigger point here that the Dream Act is a whole lot of nothing. If it were enacted, probably would have very minimal impact other than the pro illegal immigration crowd could claim a short term victory in their fight towards the real goals which are amnesty for all undocumented and eventually fully open borders.
December 28, 2010 at 12:29 PM #645267ocrenterParticipant[quote=deadzone]Well if you are realistic lower income people are not generally attending universities anyway especially not top tier schools like UC, unless they are provided assistance which is usually tax payer supported in one way or another.[/quote]
right now as part of the immigration pipeline is the the money and employment factor. Immigrants can apply for legal status claiming they have essential skills needed by American companies or if they have enough money to invest in the country and create jobs.
Essentially what the country is saying is we value your skills and we value your money.
What is wrong with saying we value your academic achievements? which we know eventually lead to skills and money. (and like I mentioned earlier, raise the bar, as I’m sure we all know the quality of the student body at most community colleges).
December 28, 2010 at 12:29 PM #645338ocrenterParticipant[quote=deadzone]Well if you are realistic lower income people are not generally attending universities anyway especially not top tier schools like UC, unless they are provided assistance which is usually tax payer supported in one way or another.[/quote]
right now as part of the immigration pipeline is the the money and employment factor. Immigrants can apply for legal status claiming they have essential skills needed by American companies or if they have enough money to invest in the country and create jobs.
Essentially what the country is saying is we value your skills and we value your money.
What is wrong with saying we value your academic achievements? which we know eventually lead to skills and money. (and like I mentioned earlier, raise the bar, as I’m sure we all know the quality of the student body at most community colleges).
December 28, 2010 at 12:29 PM #645920ocrenterParticipant[quote=deadzone]Well if you are realistic lower income people are not generally attending universities anyway especially not top tier schools like UC, unless they are provided assistance which is usually tax payer supported in one way or another.[/quote]
right now as part of the immigration pipeline is the the money and employment factor. Immigrants can apply for legal status claiming they have essential skills needed by American companies or if they have enough money to invest in the country and create jobs.
Essentially what the country is saying is we value your skills and we value your money.
What is wrong with saying we value your academic achievements? which we know eventually lead to skills and money. (and like I mentioned earlier, raise the bar, as I’m sure we all know the quality of the student body at most community colleges).
December 28, 2010 at 12:29 PM #646057ocrenterParticipant[quote=deadzone]Well if you are realistic lower income people are not generally attending universities anyway especially not top tier schools like UC, unless they are provided assistance which is usually tax payer supported in one way or another.[/quote]
right now as part of the immigration pipeline is the the money and employment factor. Immigrants can apply for legal status claiming they have essential skills needed by American companies or if they have enough money to invest in the country and create jobs.
Essentially what the country is saying is we value your skills and we value your money.
What is wrong with saying we value your academic achievements? which we know eventually lead to skills and money. (and like I mentioned earlier, raise the bar, as I’m sure we all know the quality of the student body at most community colleges).
December 28, 2010 at 12:29 PM #646382ocrenterParticipant[quote=deadzone]Well if you are realistic lower income people are not generally attending universities anyway especially not top tier schools like UC, unless they are provided assistance which is usually tax payer supported in one way or another.[/quote]
right now as part of the immigration pipeline is the the money and employment factor. Immigrants can apply for legal status claiming they have essential skills needed by American companies or if they have enough money to invest in the country and create jobs.
Essentially what the country is saying is we value your skills and we value your money.
What is wrong with saying we value your academic achievements? which we know eventually lead to skills and money. (and like I mentioned earlier, raise the bar, as I’m sure we all know the quality of the student body at most community colleges).
December 28, 2010 at 5:10 PM #645382AnonymousGuestWhat does academic achievement have to do with the Dream Act? Graduating from a two year community college is considered achievement? Or serving the military even though you can’t perform most critical functions because you can’t get a security clearance?
December 28, 2010 at 5:10 PM #645453AnonymousGuestWhat does academic achievement have to do with the Dream Act? Graduating from a two year community college is considered achievement? Or serving the military even though you can’t perform most critical functions because you can’t get a security clearance?
December 28, 2010 at 5:10 PM #646034AnonymousGuestWhat does academic achievement have to do with the Dream Act? Graduating from a two year community college is considered achievement? Or serving the military even though you can’t perform most critical functions because you can’t get a security clearance?
December 28, 2010 at 5:10 PM #646173AnonymousGuestWhat does academic achievement have to do with the Dream Act? Graduating from a two year community college is considered achievement? Or serving the military even though you can’t perform most critical functions because you can’t get a security clearance?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.