- This topic has 45 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 13 years ago by
Aecetia.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 24, 2011 at 7:56 AM #690005April 24, 2011 at 11:40 AM #688857
UCGal
Participant[quote=threadkiller]Didn’t read the original post-sorry! But in yesterday’s paper it showed the deficit for the last 40 years and the only time it wasn’t skyrocketing was during Clinton’s reign. Now was that the GOP congress or was it Clinton, sure that could be debated. Had Obama carried through on his promise to end the war (war’s?) in the middle east I’m sure his watch would not look as bad as it does. Unfortunately he did not. So now we as a country will have to pay for not only Bush’s mistakes but also Obama’s. Because of outsourcing,overseas production of goods, and foreign wars I for one do not see the light at the end of the tunnel, hopefully I am just blind.[/quote]
I agree with this. I don’t see a light at the end of the tunnel, either.I read the OP until about the 3rd or 4th inaccuracy. It’s one thing to have a politically slanted rant – but you lose me when you mess with the facts.
April 24, 2011 at 11:40 AM #688921Participant[quote=threadkiller]Didn’t read the original post-sorry! But in yesterday’s paper it showed the deficit for the last 40 years and the only time it wasn’t skyrocketing was during Clinton’s reign. Now was that the GOP congress or was it Clinton, sure that could be debated. Had Obama carried through on his promise to end the war (war’s?) in the middle east I’m sure his watch would not look as bad as it does. Unfortunately he did not. So now we as a country will have to pay for not only Bush’s mistakes but also Obama’s. Because of outsourcing,overseas production of goods, and foreign wars I for one do not see the light at the end of the tunnel, hopefully I am just blind.[/quote]
I agree with this. I don’t see a light at the end of the tunnel, either.I read the OP until about the 3rd or 4th inaccuracy. It’s one thing to have a politically slanted rant – but you lose me when you mess with the facts.
April 24, 2011 at 11:40 AM #689536Participant[quote=threadkiller]Didn’t read the original post-sorry! But in yesterday’s paper it showed the deficit for the last 40 years and the only time it wasn’t skyrocketing was during Clinton’s reign. Now was that the GOP congress or was it Clinton, sure that could be debated. Had Obama carried through on his promise to end the war (war’s?) in the middle east I’m sure his watch would not look as bad as it does. Unfortunately he did not. So now we as a country will have to pay for not only Bush’s mistakes but also Obama’s. Because of outsourcing,overseas production of goods, and foreign wars I for one do not see the light at the end of the tunnel, hopefully I am just blind.[/quote]
I agree with this. I don’t see a light at the end of the tunnel, either.I read the OP until about the 3rd or 4th inaccuracy. It’s one thing to have a politically slanted rant – but you lose me when you mess with the facts.
April 24, 2011 at 11:40 AM #689680Participant[quote=threadkiller]Didn’t read the original post-sorry! But in yesterday’s paper it showed the deficit for the last 40 years and the only time it wasn’t skyrocketing was during Clinton’s reign. Now was that the GOP congress or was it Clinton, sure that could be debated. Had Obama carried through on his promise to end the war (war’s?) in the middle east I’m sure his watch would not look as bad as it does. Unfortunately he did not. So now we as a country will have to pay for not only Bush’s mistakes but also Obama’s. Because of outsourcing,overseas production of goods, and foreign wars I for one do not see the light at the end of the tunnel, hopefully I am just blind.[/quote]
I agree with this. I don’t see a light at the end of the tunnel, either.I read the OP until about the 3rd or 4th inaccuracy. It’s one thing to have a politically slanted rant – but you lose me when you mess with the facts.
April 24, 2011 at 11:40 AM #690030Participant[quote=threadkiller]Didn’t read the original post-sorry! But in yesterday’s paper it showed the deficit for the last 40 years and the only time it wasn’t skyrocketing was during Clinton’s reign. Now was that the GOP congress or was it Clinton, sure that could be debated. Had Obama carried through on his promise to end the war (war’s?) in the middle east I’m sure his watch would not look as bad as it does. Unfortunately he did not. So now we as a country will have to pay for not only Bush’s mistakes but also Obama’s. Because of outsourcing,overseas production of goods, and foreign wars I for one do not see the light at the end of the tunnel, hopefully I am just blind.[/quote]
I agree with this. I don’t see a light at the end of the tunnel, either.I read the OP until about the 3rd or 4th inaccuracy. It’s one thing to have a politically slanted rant – but you lose me when you mess with the facts.
April 24, 2011 at 11:55 AM #688862SK in CV
Participant[quote=paramount][quote=Eugene]
And these people ridicule and vilify Obama because he expects the recession to end and he wants to roll back some of the Bush tax cuts.[/quote]
You meant to say wealth redistribution, right?[/quote]
Where exactly does normalized taxes end and “wealth redistribution” begin? 35%? 36% 37% 38%…please tell me when i’m getting warm.
April 24, 2011 at 11:55 AM #688926Participant[quote=paramount][quote=Eugene]
And these people ridicule and vilify Obama because he expects the recession to end and he wants to roll back some of the Bush tax cuts.[/quote]
You meant to say wealth redistribution, right?[/quote]
Where exactly does normalized taxes end and “wealth redistribution” begin? 35%? 36% 37% 38%…please tell me when i’m getting warm.
April 24, 2011 at 11:55 AM #689541Participant[quote=paramount][quote=Eugene]
And these people ridicule and vilify Obama because he expects the recession to end and he wants to roll back some of the Bush tax cuts.[/quote]
You meant to say wealth redistribution, right?[/quote]
Where exactly does normalized taxes end and “wealth redistribution” begin? 35%? 36% 37% 38%…please tell me when i’m getting warm.
April 24, 2011 at 11:55 AM #689685Participant[quote=paramount][quote=Eugene]
And these people ridicule and vilify Obama because he expects the recession to end and he wants to roll back some of the Bush tax cuts.[/quote]
You meant to say wealth redistribution, right?[/quote]
Where exactly does normalized taxes end and “wealth redistribution” begin? 35%? 36% 37% 38%…please tell me when i’m getting warm.
April 24, 2011 at 11:55 AM #690035Participant[quote=paramount][quote=Eugene]
And these people ridicule and vilify Obama because he expects the recession to end and he wants to roll back some of the Bush tax cuts.[/quote]
You meant to say wealth redistribution, right?[/quote]
Where exactly does normalized taxes end and “wealth redistribution” begin? 35%? 36% 37% 38%…please tell me when i’m getting warm.
April 24, 2011 at 12:39 PM #688872sjk
ParticipantEugene,witch government nipple are you sucking from? local, State,or Federal ?
April 24, 2011 at 12:39 PM #688935ParticipantEugene,witch government nipple are you sucking from? local, State,or Federal ?
April 24, 2011 at 12:39 PM #689551ParticipantEugene,witch government nipple are you sucking from? local, State,or Federal ?
April 24, 2011 at 12:39 PM #689695ParticipantEugene,witch government nipple are you sucking from? local, State,or Federal ?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.