Home › Forums › Other › OT: Schwarzenegger proposes the complete elimination of all state welfare programs
- This topic has 545 replies, 31 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 12 months ago by DWCAP.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 23, 2009 at 9:05 AM #405323May 23, 2009 at 9:27 AM #404642ocrenterParticipant
[img_assist|nid=11145|title=CA Budget breakdown|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=74]
this is not about scare tactic. look at where most of the budget ends up, 30% is welfare and medi-Cal and 40% is education. that’s 70% of the budget. there’s a lot of waste in both fields. there’s a lot of folks living off the state either by exaggerating disability or in job-for-life programs protected by various unions.
whenever politicians talk about cuts, pictures of children who can’t afford their medication are paraded around. politicians back down and start borrowing or tax the productive citizens.
the voters have spoken, we don’t want more debt, if we can’t pay for it, then we can’t pay for it.
May 23, 2009 at 9:27 AM #404888ocrenterParticipant[img_assist|nid=11145|title=CA Budget breakdown|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=74]
this is not about scare tactic. look at where most of the budget ends up, 30% is welfare and medi-Cal and 40% is education. that’s 70% of the budget. there’s a lot of waste in both fields. there’s a lot of folks living off the state either by exaggerating disability or in job-for-life programs protected by various unions.
whenever politicians talk about cuts, pictures of children who can’t afford their medication are paraded around. politicians back down and start borrowing or tax the productive citizens.
the voters have spoken, we don’t want more debt, if we can’t pay for it, then we can’t pay for it.
May 23, 2009 at 9:27 AM #405125ocrenterParticipant[img_assist|nid=11145|title=CA Budget breakdown|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=74]
this is not about scare tactic. look at where most of the budget ends up, 30% is welfare and medi-Cal and 40% is education. that’s 70% of the budget. there’s a lot of waste in both fields. there’s a lot of folks living off the state either by exaggerating disability or in job-for-life programs protected by various unions.
whenever politicians talk about cuts, pictures of children who can’t afford their medication are paraded around. politicians back down and start borrowing or tax the productive citizens.
the voters have spoken, we don’t want more debt, if we can’t pay for it, then we can’t pay for it.
May 23, 2009 at 9:27 AM #405186ocrenterParticipant[img_assist|nid=11145|title=CA Budget breakdown|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=74]
this is not about scare tactic. look at where most of the budget ends up, 30% is welfare and medi-Cal and 40% is education. that’s 70% of the budget. there’s a lot of waste in both fields. there’s a lot of folks living off the state either by exaggerating disability or in job-for-life programs protected by various unions.
whenever politicians talk about cuts, pictures of children who can’t afford their medication are paraded around. politicians back down and start borrowing or tax the productive citizens.
the voters have spoken, we don’t want more debt, if we can’t pay for it, then we can’t pay for it.
May 23, 2009 at 9:27 AM #405333ocrenterParticipant[img_assist|nid=11145|title=CA Budget breakdown|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=74]
this is not about scare tactic. look at where most of the budget ends up, 30% is welfare and medi-Cal and 40% is education. that’s 70% of the budget. there’s a lot of waste in both fields. there’s a lot of folks living off the state either by exaggerating disability or in job-for-life programs protected by various unions.
whenever politicians talk about cuts, pictures of children who can’t afford their medication are paraded around. politicians back down and start borrowing or tax the productive citizens.
the voters have spoken, we don’t want more debt, if we can’t pay for it, then we can’t pay for it.
May 23, 2009 at 9:35 AM #404652ZeitgeistParticipantGood post-
“Posted by: the Graduate|May 22, 2009 at 05:04 PM1. People on welfare should not have kids. People without welfare with kids will be a good example for future poor people thinking about having kids.
2. After drastic cuts to welfare the remaining pepole who get welfare should have to do community service or give up benefits.
3. The college system is fried. Those grants that pay for students are increasing the cost of education. Students who cannot pay for college will have to wait it out at Community Colleges or go to Tech School and learn a valuable trade. Students working 5 jobs should go to a school they can afford.
4. Illegals don’t deserve anything here. Be real. If you want them to get health care or food then take them to your own doctor or restaurant and pay for them.
5. Fiscal restraint people. Not everybody making a living should have a 2 car garage.
6. People who made too much money and spent it all should never be bailed out. Includes underwater homeowners, college students, banks, etc.”
May 23, 2009 at 9:35 AM #404898ZeitgeistParticipantGood post-
“Posted by: the Graduate|May 22, 2009 at 05:04 PM1. People on welfare should not have kids. People without welfare with kids will be a good example for future poor people thinking about having kids.
2. After drastic cuts to welfare the remaining pepole who get welfare should have to do community service or give up benefits.
3. The college system is fried. Those grants that pay for students are increasing the cost of education. Students who cannot pay for college will have to wait it out at Community Colleges or go to Tech School and learn a valuable trade. Students working 5 jobs should go to a school they can afford.
4. Illegals don’t deserve anything here. Be real. If you want them to get health care or food then take them to your own doctor or restaurant and pay for them.
5. Fiscal restraint people. Not everybody making a living should have a 2 car garage.
6. People who made too much money and spent it all should never be bailed out. Includes underwater homeowners, college students, banks, etc.”
May 23, 2009 at 9:35 AM #405135ZeitgeistParticipantGood post-
“Posted by: the Graduate|May 22, 2009 at 05:04 PM1. People on welfare should not have kids. People without welfare with kids will be a good example for future poor people thinking about having kids.
2. After drastic cuts to welfare the remaining pepole who get welfare should have to do community service or give up benefits.
3. The college system is fried. Those grants that pay for students are increasing the cost of education. Students who cannot pay for college will have to wait it out at Community Colleges or go to Tech School and learn a valuable trade. Students working 5 jobs should go to a school they can afford.
4. Illegals don’t deserve anything here. Be real. If you want them to get health care or food then take them to your own doctor or restaurant and pay for them.
5. Fiscal restraint people. Not everybody making a living should have a 2 car garage.
6. People who made too much money and spent it all should never be bailed out. Includes underwater homeowners, college students, banks, etc.”
May 23, 2009 at 9:35 AM #405196ZeitgeistParticipantGood post-
“Posted by: the Graduate|May 22, 2009 at 05:04 PM1. People on welfare should not have kids. People without welfare with kids will be a good example for future poor people thinking about having kids.
2. After drastic cuts to welfare the remaining pepole who get welfare should have to do community service or give up benefits.
3. The college system is fried. Those grants that pay for students are increasing the cost of education. Students who cannot pay for college will have to wait it out at Community Colleges or go to Tech School and learn a valuable trade. Students working 5 jobs should go to a school they can afford.
4. Illegals don’t deserve anything here. Be real. If you want them to get health care or food then take them to your own doctor or restaurant and pay for them.
5. Fiscal restraint people. Not everybody making a living should have a 2 car garage.
6. People who made too much money and spent it all should never be bailed out. Includes underwater homeowners, college students, banks, etc.”
May 23, 2009 at 9:35 AM #405343ZeitgeistParticipantGood post-
“Posted by: the Graduate|May 22, 2009 at 05:04 PM1. People on welfare should not have kids. People without welfare with kids will be a good example for future poor people thinking about having kids.
2. After drastic cuts to welfare the remaining pepole who get welfare should have to do community service or give up benefits.
3. The college system is fried. Those grants that pay for students are increasing the cost of education. Students who cannot pay for college will have to wait it out at Community Colleges or go to Tech School and learn a valuable trade. Students working 5 jobs should go to a school they can afford.
4. Illegals don’t deserve anything here. Be real. If you want them to get health care or food then take them to your own doctor or restaurant and pay for them.
5. Fiscal restraint people. Not everybody making a living should have a 2 car garage.
6. People who made too much money and spent it all should never be bailed out. Includes underwater homeowners, college students, banks, etc.”
May 23, 2009 at 10:05 AM #404667VeritasParticipantPartypup- It might be a bluff to get the Feds to bail out the State. Either way the Governator wins. It is actually a smart move. Maybe the recipients will move or self- deport.
May 23, 2009 at 10:05 AM #404913VeritasParticipantPartypup- It might be a bluff to get the Feds to bail out the State. Either way the Governator wins. It is actually a smart move. Maybe the recipients will move or self- deport.
May 23, 2009 at 10:05 AM #405150VeritasParticipantPartypup- It might be a bluff to get the Feds to bail out the State. Either way the Governator wins. It is actually a smart move. Maybe the recipients will move or self- deport.
May 23, 2009 at 10:05 AM #405211VeritasParticipantPartypup- It might be a bluff to get the Feds to bail out the State. Either way the Governator wins. It is actually a smart move. Maybe the recipients will move or self- deport.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.