OT. PC is in Rush is out

[Zeitgeist]

Exactly right, Allan. Substitute a minority or gay and it would be blatant, hateful bashing. Use Catholic or Christian and Brian thinks he is the all knowing, one and true defender of all the earths minorities. He did not answer if he is living at home either. I did not ask if he was living in the basement at home… He has no idea who the people out here are and prefers to call them Kansans. For all he knows they, too are minorities and women. There are quite a few on Piggington. Not all minorities are liberal dems and neither are all women. I guess he is the great white defender??? He is practically pious in his pompousness,

[Arraya]

The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy.

[Arraya]

The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy.

[Arraya]

The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy.

[Arraya]

The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy.

[Arraya]

The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy.

[Zeitgeist]

I think they are mostly identical: both being the party of the corporation and not the party of the people who they represent. What say you, Arraya?

[Zeitgeist]

I think they are mostly identical: both being the party of the corporation and not the party of the people who they represent. What say you, Arraya?

[Zeitgeist]

I think they are mostly identical: both being the party of the corporation and not the party of the people who they represent. What say you, Arraya?

[Zeitgeist]

I think they are mostly identical: both being the party of the corporation and not the party of the people who they represent. What say you, Arraya?

[Zeitgeist]

I think they are mostly identical: both being the party of the corporation and not the party of the people who they represent. What say you, Arraya?

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=Zeitgeist]I think they are mostly identical: both being the party of the corporation and not the party of the people who they represent. What say you, Arraya?[/quote]

Zeit: Arraya’s right and its easy enough to prove. Take a hard look at Pelosi, the Dem’s crusading avenger against corruption and influence peddling. Remember her declaiming about “draining the swamp” and ushering in a new era of honesty and accountability following the Tom DeLay and Abramoff fiascos?

Now we have Charlie Rangel and nary a peep from Nancy. No calls for him to step down or step aside. It appears honesty and transparency and accountability only count when it comes to the other party, right, Brian?

“Meet the new boss, same as the old boss”.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=Zeitgeist]I think they are mostly identical: both being the party of the corporation and not the party of the people who they represent. What say you, Arraya?[/quote]

Zeit: Arraya’s right and its easy enough to prove. Take a hard look at Pelosi, the Dem’s crusading avenger against corruption and influence peddling. Remember her declaiming about “draining the swamp” and ushering in a new era of honesty and accountability following the Tom DeLay and Abramoff fiascos?

Now we have Charlie Rangel and nary a peep from Nancy. No calls for him to step down or step aside. It appears honesty and transparency and accountability only count when it comes to the other party, right, Brian?

“Meet the new boss, same as the old boss”.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=Zeitgeist]I think they are mostly identical: both being the party of the corporation and not the party of the people who they represent. What say you, Arraya?[/quote]

Zeit: Arraya’s right and its easy enough to prove. Take a hard look at Pelosi, the Dem’s crusading avenger against corruption and influence peddling. Remember her declaiming about “draining the swamp” and ushering in a new era of honesty and accountability following the Tom DeLay and Abramoff fiascos?

Now we have Charlie Rangel and nary a peep from Nancy. No calls for him to step down or step aside. It appears honesty and transparency and accountability only count when it comes to the other party, right, Brian?

“Meet the new boss, same as the old boss”.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=Zeitgeist]I think they are mostly identical: both being the party of the corporation and not the party of the people who they represent. What say you, Arraya?[/quote]

Zeit: Arraya’s right and its easy enough to prove. Take a hard look at Pelosi, the Dem’s crusading avenger against corruption and influence peddling. Remember her declaiming about “draining the swamp” and ushering in a new era of honesty and accountability following the Tom DeLay and Abramoff fiascos?

Now we have Charlie Rangel and nary a peep from Nancy. No calls for him to step down or step aside. It appears honesty and transparency and accountability only count when it comes to the other party, right, Brian?

“Meet the new boss, same as the old boss”.

[Author]

Posts