- This topic has 655 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 3 months ago by Coronita.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 3, 2011 at 3:37 PM #663531February 14, 2011 at 2:47 PM #666289AnonymousGuest
And back to the federal budget news:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/postpartisan/2011/02/the_budget_headlines_we_need.html
Here’s where we stand so far:
– Neither party is proposing any real deficit reduction.
– Nobody has the balls to cut defense.
– The Tea Party phenomenon has changed nothing. At best, they have nudged the Republicans toward slightly larger cuts in their plan, but this is insignificant in the bigger picture.
Neither party’s proposals even begin to address overspending and the national debt.
February 14, 2011 at 2:47 PM #666351AnonymousGuestAnd back to the federal budget news:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/postpartisan/2011/02/the_budget_headlines_we_need.html
Here’s where we stand so far:
– Neither party is proposing any real deficit reduction.
– Nobody has the balls to cut defense.
– The Tea Party phenomenon has changed nothing. At best, they have nudged the Republicans toward slightly larger cuts in their plan, but this is insignificant in the bigger picture.
Neither party’s proposals even begin to address overspending and the national debt.
February 14, 2011 at 2:47 PM #666955AnonymousGuestAnd back to the federal budget news:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/postpartisan/2011/02/the_budget_headlines_we_need.html
Here’s where we stand so far:
– Neither party is proposing any real deficit reduction.
– Nobody has the balls to cut defense.
– The Tea Party phenomenon has changed nothing. At best, they have nudged the Republicans toward slightly larger cuts in their plan, but this is insignificant in the bigger picture.
Neither party’s proposals even begin to address overspending and the national debt.
February 14, 2011 at 2:47 PM #667093AnonymousGuestAnd back to the federal budget news:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/postpartisan/2011/02/the_budget_headlines_we_need.html
Here’s where we stand so far:
– Neither party is proposing any real deficit reduction.
– Nobody has the balls to cut defense.
– The Tea Party phenomenon has changed nothing. At best, they have nudged the Republicans toward slightly larger cuts in their plan, but this is insignificant in the bigger picture.
Neither party’s proposals even begin to address overspending and the national debt.
February 14, 2011 at 2:47 PM #667430AnonymousGuestAnd back to the federal budget news:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/postpartisan/2011/02/the_budget_headlines_we_need.html
Here’s where we stand so far:
– Neither party is proposing any real deficit reduction.
– Nobody has the balls to cut defense.
– The Tea Party phenomenon has changed nothing. At best, they have nudged the Republicans toward slightly larger cuts in their plan, but this is insignificant in the bigger picture.
Neither party’s proposals even begin to address overspending and the national debt.
February 15, 2011 at 8:36 AM #666484afx114ParticipantHere’s an awesome interactive chart that visually breaks down every part of the budget: http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/newsgraphics/2011/0119-budget/index.html. Make sure you zoom all the way into the tiny shit that everybody wants to cut but won’t make much of an impact.
February 15, 2011 at 8:36 AM #666547afx114ParticipantHere’s an awesome interactive chart that visually breaks down every part of the budget: http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/newsgraphics/2011/0119-budget/index.html. Make sure you zoom all the way into the tiny shit that everybody wants to cut but won’t make much of an impact.
February 15, 2011 at 8:36 AM #667151afx114ParticipantHere’s an awesome interactive chart that visually breaks down every part of the budget: http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/newsgraphics/2011/0119-budget/index.html. Make sure you zoom all the way into the tiny shit that everybody wants to cut but won’t make much of an impact.
February 15, 2011 at 8:36 AM #667290afx114ParticipantHere’s an awesome interactive chart that visually breaks down every part of the budget: http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/newsgraphics/2011/0119-budget/index.html. Make sure you zoom all the way into the tiny shit that everybody wants to cut but won’t make much of an impact.
February 15, 2011 at 8:36 AM #667630afx114ParticipantHere’s an awesome interactive chart that visually breaks down every part of the budget: http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/newsgraphics/2011/0119-budget/index.html. Make sure you zoom all the way into the tiny shit that everybody wants to cut but won’t make much of an impact.
February 15, 2011 at 8:55 AM #666509no_such_realityParticipantIf start with the 2002 budget and scale for population growth and inflation, the budget should be $2.7 Trillion.
The proposal is $3.7 Trillion and they are crying about the cuts.
February 15, 2011 at 8:55 AM #666572no_such_realityParticipantIf start with the 2002 budget and scale for population growth and inflation, the budget should be $2.7 Trillion.
The proposal is $3.7 Trillion and they are crying about the cuts.
February 15, 2011 at 8:55 AM #667176no_such_realityParticipantIf start with the 2002 budget and scale for population growth and inflation, the budget should be $2.7 Trillion.
The proposal is $3.7 Trillion and they are crying about the cuts.
February 15, 2011 at 8:55 AM #667315no_such_realityParticipantIf start with the 2002 budget and scale for population growth and inflation, the budget should be $2.7 Trillion.
The proposal is $3.7 Trillion and they are crying about the cuts.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.