- This topic has 495 replies, 26 voices, and was last updated 16 years ago by equalizer.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 2, 2008 at 1:09 PM #14353November 2, 2008 at 1:20 PM #296726blahblahblahParticipant
The news has been running lots of stories lately about why exit polls are inaccurate. Never mind the fact that they are the standard for monitoring election fairness in countries around the world. Just know that they are inaccurate and not to be trusted, unlike the electronic machines of course which can never be wrong, because they’re — ummm, electronic, yeah that’s why.
November 2, 2008 at 1:20 PM #297070blahblahblahParticipantThe news has been running lots of stories lately about why exit polls are inaccurate. Never mind the fact that they are the standard for monitoring election fairness in countries around the world. Just know that they are inaccurate and not to be trusted, unlike the electronic machines of course which can never be wrong, because they’re — ummm, electronic, yeah that’s why.
November 2, 2008 at 1:20 PM #297086blahblahblahParticipantThe news has been running lots of stories lately about why exit polls are inaccurate. Never mind the fact that they are the standard for monitoring election fairness in countries around the world. Just know that they are inaccurate and not to be trusted, unlike the electronic machines of course which can never be wrong, because they’re — ummm, electronic, yeah that’s why.
November 2, 2008 at 1:20 PM #297099blahblahblahParticipantThe news has been running lots of stories lately about why exit polls are inaccurate. Never mind the fact that they are the standard for monitoring election fairness in countries around the world. Just know that they are inaccurate and not to be trusted, unlike the electronic machines of course which can never be wrong, because they’re — ummm, electronic, yeah that’s why.
November 2, 2008 at 1:20 PM #297143blahblahblahParticipantThe news has been running lots of stories lately about why exit polls are inaccurate. Never mind the fact that they are the standard for monitoring election fairness in countries around the world. Just know that they are inaccurate and not to be trusted, unlike the electronic machines of course which can never be wrong, because they’re — ummm, electronic, yeah that’s why.
November 2, 2008 at 2:00 PM #296731KilohanaParticipantIf what you say is true, there is a lot of money to be made here.
Good luck!
November 2, 2008 at 2:00 PM #297074KilohanaParticipantIf what you say is true, there is a lot of money to be made here.
Good luck!
November 2, 2008 at 2:00 PM #297091KilohanaParticipantIf what you say is true, there is a lot of money to be made here.
Good luck!
November 2, 2008 at 2:00 PM #297104KilohanaParticipantIf what you say is true, there is a lot of money to be made here.
Good luck!
November 2, 2008 at 2:00 PM #297148KilohanaParticipantIf what you say is true, there is a lot of money to be made here.
Good luck!
November 2, 2008 at 2:10 PM #296736partypupParticipantI don’t need the luck. I don’t bet on anything that can be fixed, including the stock market.
In any event, the gamblers at inTrade are simply looking at the poll results and not their methodology.
November 2, 2008 at 2:10 PM #297080partypupParticipantI don’t need the luck. I don’t bet on anything that can be fixed, including the stock market.
In any event, the gamblers at inTrade are simply looking at the poll results and not their methodology.
November 2, 2008 at 2:10 PM #297097partypupParticipantI don’t need the luck. I don’t bet on anything that can be fixed, including the stock market.
In any event, the gamblers at inTrade are simply looking at the poll results and not their methodology.
November 2, 2008 at 2:10 PM #297109partypupParticipantI don’t need the luck. I don’t bet on anything that can be fixed, including the stock market.
In any event, the gamblers at inTrade are simply looking at the poll results and not their methodology.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.