- This topic has 740 replies, 34 voices, and was last updated 16 years ago by SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 16, 2008 at 8:55 PM #288681October 16, 2008 at 9:26 PM #288348equalizerParticipant
bob2007,
Ask sdrealtor for tax advice, I’m sure he’ll tell you that you just buy the 6,000 lb vehicle for big tax credit and various other tax savings schemes. Just like the Hollywood studios who claim accounting loss on $300M gross films, the small business owner has opportunity to shield profit. Also, about the only way to cheat on your taxes is through use of business deductions or so I’ve heard from tax pros.
We need flat tax + VAT, but good luck fighting the 2M strong accouting lobby.
October 16, 2008 at 9:26 PM #288652equalizerParticipantbob2007,
Ask sdrealtor for tax advice, I’m sure he’ll tell you that you just buy the 6,000 lb vehicle for big tax credit and various other tax savings schemes. Just like the Hollywood studios who claim accounting loss on $300M gross films, the small business owner has opportunity to shield profit. Also, about the only way to cheat on your taxes is through use of business deductions or so I’ve heard from tax pros.
We need flat tax + VAT, but good luck fighting the 2M strong accouting lobby.
October 16, 2008 at 9:26 PM #288665equalizerParticipantbob2007,
Ask sdrealtor for tax advice, I’m sure he’ll tell you that you just buy the 6,000 lb vehicle for big tax credit and various other tax savings schemes. Just like the Hollywood studios who claim accounting loss on $300M gross films, the small business owner has opportunity to shield profit. Also, about the only way to cheat on your taxes is through use of business deductions or so I’ve heard from tax pros.
We need flat tax + VAT, but good luck fighting the 2M strong accouting lobby.
October 16, 2008 at 9:26 PM #288694equalizerParticipantbob2007,
Ask sdrealtor for tax advice, I’m sure he’ll tell you that you just buy the 6,000 lb vehicle for big tax credit and various other tax savings schemes. Just like the Hollywood studios who claim accounting loss on $300M gross films, the small business owner has opportunity to shield profit. Also, about the only way to cheat on your taxes is through use of business deductions or so I’ve heard from tax pros.
We need flat tax + VAT, but good luck fighting the 2M strong accouting lobby.
October 16, 2008 at 9:26 PM #288698equalizerParticipantbob2007,
Ask sdrealtor for tax advice, I’m sure he’ll tell you that you just buy the 6,000 lb vehicle for big tax credit and various other tax savings schemes. Just like the Hollywood studios who claim accounting loss on $300M gross films, the small business owner has opportunity to shield profit. Also, about the only way to cheat on your taxes is through use of business deductions or so I’ve heard from tax pros.
We need flat tax + VAT, but good luck fighting the 2M strong accouting lobby.
October 16, 2008 at 10:03 PM #288363anParticipantequalizer, I agree that any business will try to find ways to write off as much as possible. However, even after all those write off, if their taxes will still be raised because they’re marked as rich, I can almost guarantee you that they will be the last person to feel the extra tax pain. The guy they’re employing will feel it first. They would cut one or more employee to offset the extra tax burden and make the rest work harder to compensate. If majority of employer would do that, the unemployment rate would increase and the one who still have a job wouldn’t dare shop around even though he/she now have to work even harder for the same pay.
October 16, 2008 at 10:03 PM #288667anParticipantequalizer, I agree that any business will try to find ways to write off as much as possible. However, even after all those write off, if their taxes will still be raised because they’re marked as rich, I can almost guarantee you that they will be the last person to feel the extra tax pain. The guy they’re employing will feel it first. They would cut one or more employee to offset the extra tax burden and make the rest work harder to compensate. If majority of employer would do that, the unemployment rate would increase and the one who still have a job wouldn’t dare shop around even though he/she now have to work even harder for the same pay.
October 16, 2008 at 10:03 PM #288680anParticipantequalizer, I agree that any business will try to find ways to write off as much as possible. However, even after all those write off, if their taxes will still be raised because they’re marked as rich, I can almost guarantee you that they will be the last person to feel the extra tax pain. The guy they’re employing will feel it first. They would cut one or more employee to offset the extra tax burden and make the rest work harder to compensate. If majority of employer would do that, the unemployment rate would increase and the one who still have a job wouldn’t dare shop around even though he/she now have to work even harder for the same pay.
October 16, 2008 at 10:03 PM #288709anParticipantequalizer, I agree that any business will try to find ways to write off as much as possible. However, even after all those write off, if their taxes will still be raised because they’re marked as rich, I can almost guarantee you that they will be the last person to feel the extra tax pain. The guy they’re employing will feel it first. They would cut one or more employee to offset the extra tax burden and make the rest work harder to compensate. If majority of employer would do that, the unemployment rate would increase and the one who still have a job wouldn’t dare shop around even though he/she now have to work even harder for the same pay.
October 16, 2008 at 10:03 PM #288713anParticipantequalizer, I agree that any business will try to find ways to write off as much as possible. However, even after all those write off, if their taxes will still be raised because they’re marked as rich, I can almost guarantee you that they will be the last person to feel the extra tax pain. The guy they’re employing will feel it first. They would cut one or more employee to offset the extra tax burden and make the rest work harder to compensate. If majority of employer would do that, the unemployment rate would increase and the one who still have a job wouldn’t dare shop around even though he/she now have to work even harder for the same pay.
October 16, 2008 at 11:21 PM #288373patientlywaitingParticipantbob2007, I wouldn’t have a problem with McCain if his goal was to lower the business tax rate and he leveled with the people.
Joe the Plumber is a fraud. And I have a problem with the subterfuge.
Yes, I’ve run businesses and I know how to read balance sheets and income statements.
My bet is that Joe’s plumbing business grosses (not nets) $250k. In that case, he has no reason to gripe about Obama’s tax plan, and McCain should not have brought him up.
McCain said he was to run an honorable campaign based on issues. But he’s being dishonest at every turn. That’s the point.
bob2007, read the story yourself and if you’re any good at valuating businesses, you would know that Joe the Plumber would NOT pay more taxes w/ the Obama plan.
So why is Joe the Plumber a hero to the Republican base? Because they are a herd of sheep?
October 16, 2008 at 11:21 PM #288677patientlywaitingParticipantbob2007, I wouldn’t have a problem with McCain if his goal was to lower the business tax rate and he leveled with the people.
Joe the Plumber is a fraud. And I have a problem with the subterfuge.
Yes, I’ve run businesses and I know how to read balance sheets and income statements.
My bet is that Joe’s plumbing business grosses (not nets) $250k. In that case, he has no reason to gripe about Obama’s tax plan, and McCain should not have brought him up.
McCain said he was to run an honorable campaign based on issues. But he’s being dishonest at every turn. That’s the point.
bob2007, read the story yourself and if you’re any good at valuating businesses, you would know that Joe the Plumber would NOT pay more taxes w/ the Obama plan.
So why is Joe the Plumber a hero to the Republican base? Because they are a herd of sheep?
October 16, 2008 at 11:21 PM #288691patientlywaitingParticipantbob2007, I wouldn’t have a problem with McCain if his goal was to lower the business tax rate and he leveled with the people.
Joe the Plumber is a fraud. And I have a problem with the subterfuge.
Yes, I’ve run businesses and I know how to read balance sheets and income statements.
My bet is that Joe’s plumbing business grosses (not nets) $250k. In that case, he has no reason to gripe about Obama’s tax plan, and McCain should not have brought him up.
McCain said he was to run an honorable campaign based on issues. But he’s being dishonest at every turn. That’s the point.
bob2007, read the story yourself and if you’re any good at valuating businesses, you would know that Joe the Plumber would NOT pay more taxes w/ the Obama plan.
So why is Joe the Plumber a hero to the Republican base? Because they are a herd of sheep?
October 16, 2008 at 11:21 PM #288720patientlywaitingParticipantbob2007, I wouldn’t have a problem with McCain if his goal was to lower the business tax rate and he leveled with the people.
Joe the Plumber is a fraud. And I have a problem with the subterfuge.
Yes, I’ve run businesses and I know how to read balance sheets and income statements.
My bet is that Joe’s plumbing business grosses (not nets) $250k. In that case, he has no reason to gripe about Obama’s tax plan, and McCain should not have brought him up.
McCain said he was to run an honorable campaign based on issues. But he’s being dishonest at every turn. That’s the point.
bob2007, read the story yourself and if you’re any good at valuating businesses, you would know that Joe the Plumber would NOT pay more taxes w/ the Obama plan.
So why is Joe the Plumber a hero to the Republican base? Because they are a herd of sheep?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.