OT: It’s official – the majority of Californians are idiots.

[equalizer]

[quote=tc]Someone should write a prop that we balance the state budget.[/quote]

A few more:

1) Force CA Leg and Supreme court members to all be fired for cause if they dont make sure that prop is constitutional before election.

2) Ban gay topic hijacking of all threads (lipstick lesbians excepted)

3) If a prop states that a bond is not a tax increase, the group is fined one billion dollars.

4) Require 2/3 vote for bonds

5) Ban minimum funding props. (Currently every prop states that X dollars go to schools, polices, gays, etc)

[equalizer]

[quote=CardiffBaseball]Thus I don’t find what they did disingenuous at all. Rather I’d say it was to be expected and realistically well thought out. We’ll never really know but my guess is it made the race closer. [/quote]

Surprised they didn’t include picture of Cheney in a collage to make that point.

[equalizer]

[quote=CardiffBaseball]Thus I don’t find what they did disingenuous at all. Rather I’d say it was to be expected and realistically well thought out. We’ll never really know but my guess is it made the race closer. [/quote]

Surprised they didn’t include picture of Cheney in a collage to make that point.

[equalizer]

[quote=CardiffBaseball]Thus I don’t find what they did disingenuous at all. Rather I’d say it was to be expected and realistically well thought out. We’ll never really know but my guess is it made the race closer. [/quote]

Surprised they didn’t include picture of Cheney in a collage to make that point.

[equalizer]

[quote=CardiffBaseball]Thus I don’t find what they did disingenuous at all. Rather I’d say it was to be expected and realistically well thought out. We’ll never really know but my guess is it made the race closer. [/quote]

Surprised they didn’t include picture of Cheney in a collage to make that point.

[equalizer]

[quote=CardiffBaseball]Thus I don’t find what they did disingenuous at all. Rather I’d say it was to be expected and realistically well thought out. We’ll never really know but my guess is it made the race closer. [/quote]

Surprised they didn’t include picture of Cheney in a collage to make that point.

[Ren]

[quote=equalizer]
4) Require 2/3 vote for bonds
[/quote]

This alone would make a huge difference.

I remember last year there was a proposition that was superceded by another which included the same wording, along with some additions. It was too late to remove the old one from the ballot, so the state published instructions that stated, in no uncertain terms, this prop is now defunct, VOTE NO on it. These instructions were easily found on the web and broadcast on local news. What do our genius fellow citizens do? 45% (or thereabouts) voted yes.

Proof that half the state is completely clueless when it comes to voting, so they need to let the other half make the decisions.

I’m sure that 45% was a big part of the majority that said “oooh neat, bullet train!”

[Ren]

[quote=equalizer]
4) Require 2/3 vote for bonds
[/quote]

This alone would make a huge difference.

I remember last year there was a proposition that was superceded by another which included the same wording, along with some additions. It was too late to remove the old one from the ballot, so the state published instructions that stated, in no uncertain terms, this prop is now defunct, VOTE NO on it. These instructions were easily found on the web and broadcast on local news. What do our genius fellow citizens do? 45% (or thereabouts) voted yes.

Proof that half the state is completely clueless when it comes to voting, so they need to let the other half make the decisions.

I’m sure that 45% was a big part of the majority that said “oooh neat, bullet train!”

[Ren]

[quote=equalizer]
4) Require 2/3 vote for bonds
[/quote]

This alone would make a huge difference.

I remember last year there was a proposition that was superceded by another which included the same wording, along with some additions. It was too late to remove the old one from the ballot, so the state published instructions that stated, in no uncertain terms, this prop is now defunct, VOTE NO on it. These instructions were easily found on the web and broadcast on local news. What do our genius fellow citizens do? 45% (or thereabouts) voted yes.

Proof that half the state is completely clueless when it comes to voting, so they need to let the other half make the decisions.

I’m sure that 45% was a big part of the majority that said “oooh neat, bullet train!”

[Ren]

[quote=equalizer]
4) Require 2/3 vote for bonds
[/quote]

This alone would make a huge difference.

I remember last year there was a proposition that was superceded by another which included the same wording, along with some additions. It was too late to remove the old one from the ballot, so the state published instructions that stated, in no uncertain terms, this prop is now defunct, VOTE NO on it. These instructions were easily found on the web and broadcast on local news. What do our genius fellow citizens do? 45% (or thereabouts) voted yes.

Proof that half the state is completely clueless when it comes to voting, so they need to let the other half make the decisions.

I’m sure that 45% was a big part of the majority that said “oooh neat, bullet train!”

[Ren]

[quote=equalizer]
4) Require 2/3 vote for bonds
[/quote]

This alone would make a huge difference.

I remember last year there was a proposition that was superceded by another which included the same wording, along with some additions. It was too late to remove the old one from the ballot, so the state published instructions that stated, in no uncertain terms, this prop is now defunct, VOTE NO on it. These instructions were easily found on the web and broadcast on local news. What do our genius fellow citizens do? 45% (or thereabouts) voted yes.

Proof that half the state is completely clueless when it comes to voting, so they need to let the other half make the decisions.

I’m sure that 45% was a big part of the majority that said “oooh neat, bullet train!”

[Author]

Posts