OT: Is a War Tax Coming?

[NeetaT]

I’m a “Hawk,” I’m all for war, but you are correct in the fact that we should not have to dig into our hard earned money to pay for wars. They should be paid for via the current inflated-unwarranted tax rate or salary cuts for those in congress.

[Hatfield]

[quote=NeetaT]or salary cuts for those in congress.[/quote]

The house and senate combined have a payroll of about $94M annually. We blow through that amount of money every 15 hours in Iraq alone.

BTW, if you’re a Hawk that’s “all for war” you should consider enlisting.

[Hatfield]

[quote=NeetaT]or salary cuts for those in congress.[/quote]

The house and senate combined have a payroll of about $94M annually. We blow through that amount of money every 15 hours in Iraq alone.

BTW, if you’re a Hawk that’s “all for war” you should consider enlisting.

[Hatfield]

[quote=NeetaT]or salary cuts for those in congress.[/quote]

The house and senate combined have a payroll of about $94M annually. We blow through that amount of money every 15 hours in Iraq alone.

BTW, if you’re a Hawk that’s “all for war” you should consider enlisting.

[Hatfield]

[quote=NeetaT]or salary cuts for those in congress.[/quote]

The house and senate combined have a payroll of about $94M annually. We blow through that amount of money every 15 hours in Iraq alone.

BTW, if you’re a Hawk that’s “all for war” you should consider enlisting.

[Hatfield]

[quote=NeetaT]or salary cuts for those in congress.[/quote]

The house and senate combined have a payroll of about $94M annually. We blow through that amount of money every 15 hours in Iraq alone.

BTW, if you’re a Hawk that’s “all for war” you should consider enlisting.

[partypup]

[quote=Hatfield][quote=NeetaT]or salary cuts for those in congress.[/quote]

The house and senate combined have a payroll of about $94M annually. We blow through that amount of money every 15 hours in Iraq alone.[/quote]

Precisely. Based on those numbers, it’s doubtful that we would sending more troops.

Actually, I read this weekend (can’t remember which newspaper) that it essentially costs $1 million per annum to support each soldier.

[partypup]

[quote=Hatfield][quote=NeetaT]or salary cuts for those in congress.[/quote]

The house and senate combined have a payroll of about $94M annually. We blow through that amount of money every 15 hours in Iraq alone.[/quote]

Precisely. Based on those numbers, it’s doubtful that we would sending more troops.

Actually, I read this weekend (can’t remember which newspaper) that it essentially costs $1 million per annum to support each soldier.

[partypup]

[quote=Hatfield][quote=NeetaT]or salary cuts for those in congress.[/quote]

The house and senate combined have a payroll of about $94M annually. We blow through that amount of money every 15 hours in Iraq alone.[/quote]

Precisely. Based on those numbers, it’s doubtful that we would sending more troops.

Actually, I read this weekend (can’t remember which newspaper) that it essentially costs $1 million per annum to support each soldier.

[partypup]

[quote=Hatfield][quote=NeetaT]or salary cuts for those in congress.[/quote]

The house and senate combined have a payroll of about $94M annually. We blow through that amount of money every 15 hours in Iraq alone.[/quote]

Precisely. Based on those numbers, it’s doubtful that we would sending more troops.

Actually, I read this weekend (can’t remember which newspaper) that it essentially costs $1 million per annum to support each soldier.

[partypup]

[quote=Hatfield][quote=NeetaT]or salary cuts for those in congress.[/quote]

The house and senate combined have a payroll of about $94M annually. We blow through that amount of money every 15 hours in Iraq alone.[/quote]

Precisely. Based on those numbers, it’s doubtful that we would sending more troops.

Actually, I read this weekend (can’t remember which newspaper) that it essentially costs $1 million per annum to support each soldier.

[Arraya]

Well Neeta should be happy about Obama’s hot steemy surge coming on. Sweet creamy ‘change’ he can rub all over John Q Public and then give it to him real good. Yeah baby

[Arraya]

Well Neeta should be happy about Obama’s hot steemy surge coming on. Sweet creamy ‘change’ he can rub all over John Q Public and then give it to him real good. Yeah baby

[Arraya]

Well Neeta should be happy about Obama’s hot steemy surge coming on. Sweet creamy ‘change’ he can rub all over John Q Public and then give it to him real good. Yeah baby

[Arraya]

Well Neeta should be happy about Obama’s hot steemy surge coming on. Sweet creamy ‘change’ he can rub all over John Q Public and then give it to him real good. Yeah baby

[Author]

Posts