- This topic has 825 replies, 27 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 9 months ago by
scaredyclassic.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 28, 2011 at 10:56 AM #691195April 28, 2011 at 11:02 AM #690024
jstoesz
ParticipantThere goes that civil discourse…
Have a nice day.
April 28, 2011 at 11:02 AM #690093jstoesz
ParticipantThere goes that civil discourse…
Have a nice day.
April 28, 2011 at 11:02 AM #690705jstoesz
ParticipantThere goes that civil discourse…
Have a nice day.
April 28, 2011 at 11:02 AM #690850jstoesz
ParticipantThere goes that civil discourse…
Have a nice day.
April 28, 2011 at 11:02 AM #691200jstoesz
ParticipantThere goes that civil discourse…
Have a nice day.
April 28, 2011 at 11:16 AM #690039SK in CV
Participant[quote=jstoesz]There goes that civil discourse…
Have a nice day.[/quote]
You’re right jstoesz, there is nothing civil about “i don’t believe in homosexuality”. That’s like saying “I don’t believe in people with a different skin color than my own”. Facts don’t matter. Fairy tales rule.
April 28, 2011 at 11:16 AM #690108SK in CV
Participant[quote=jstoesz]There goes that civil discourse…
Have a nice day.[/quote]
You’re right jstoesz, there is nothing civil about “i don’t believe in homosexuality”. That’s like saying “I don’t believe in people with a different skin color than my own”. Facts don’t matter. Fairy tales rule.
April 28, 2011 at 11:16 AM #690721SK in CV
Participant[quote=jstoesz]There goes that civil discourse…
Have a nice day.[/quote]
You’re right jstoesz, there is nothing civil about “i don’t believe in homosexuality”. That’s like saying “I don’t believe in people with a different skin color than my own”. Facts don’t matter. Fairy tales rule.
April 28, 2011 at 11:16 AM #690865SK in CV
Participant[quote=jstoesz]There goes that civil discourse…
Have a nice day.[/quote]
You’re right jstoesz, there is nothing civil about “i don’t believe in homosexuality”. That’s like saying “I don’t believe in people with a different skin color than my own”. Facts don’t matter. Fairy tales rule.
April 28, 2011 at 11:16 AM #691215SK in CV
Participant[quote=jstoesz]There goes that civil discourse…
Have a nice day.[/quote]
You’re right jstoesz, there is nothing civil about “i don’t believe in homosexuality”. That’s like saying “I don’t believe in people with a different skin color than my own”. Facts don’t matter. Fairy tales rule.
April 28, 2011 at 11:43 AM #690044jstoesz
ParticipantHonestly, I really don’t care. I was not trying to wade into the morality of the issue. I was not trying to cast stones or label who threw the first. I don’t care. But this issue that you all are having is not going to go away if we all agreed on homosexual curriculum. There will always be another issue to educate someone else’s kids about. Some other state of federal mandate for some other tertiary or even core issue. The real difference, the more basic disagreement, is one of control. How much do we want the federal or state government to politicize our child’s education? The very same people who were railing against Intelligent Design (no I do not wish to open this can of worms either) as not fit for schools are now in favor of gay sensitivity training. Their position has changed because the subject matter has changed.
If you can not admit that you want to teach other people’s kids your own worldview, then this discussion is pointless. The corollary here is that you also want to drown out other people’s world views in the process. This is absurd, and this game will never end. If you want the government to have this level of control, one day you will find yourself in the minority, with your tax dollars getting siphoned off in huge amounts to support things you find offensive. And that too is wrong!
April 28, 2011 at 11:43 AM #690113jstoesz
ParticipantHonestly, I really don’t care. I was not trying to wade into the morality of the issue. I was not trying to cast stones or label who threw the first. I don’t care. But this issue that you all are having is not going to go away if we all agreed on homosexual curriculum. There will always be another issue to educate someone else’s kids about. Some other state of federal mandate for some other tertiary or even core issue. The real difference, the more basic disagreement, is one of control. How much do we want the federal or state government to politicize our child’s education? The very same people who were railing against Intelligent Design (no I do not wish to open this can of worms either) as not fit for schools are now in favor of gay sensitivity training. Their position has changed because the subject matter has changed.
If you can not admit that you want to teach other people’s kids your own worldview, then this discussion is pointless. The corollary here is that you also want to drown out other people’s world views in the process. This is absurd, and this game will never end. If you want the government to have this level of control, one day you will find yourself in the minority, with your tax dollars getting siphoned off in huge amounts to support things you find offensive. And that too is wrong!
April 28, 2011 at 11:43 AM #690726jstoesz
ParticipantHonestly, I really don’t care. I was not trying to wade into the morality of the issue. I was not trying to cast stones or label who threw the first. I don’t care. But this issue that you all are having is not going to go away if we all agreed on homosexual curriculum. There will always be another issue to educate someone else’s kids about. Some other state of federal mandate for some other tertiary or even core issue. The real difference, the more basic disagreement, is one of control. How much do we want the federal or state government to politicize our child’s education? The very same people who were railing against Intelligent Design (no I do not wish to open this can of worms either) as not fit for schools are now in favor of gay sensitivity training. Their position has changed because the subject matter has changed.
If you can not admit that you want to teach other people’s kids your own worldview, then this discussion is pointless. The corollary here is that you also want to drown out other people’s world views in the process. This is absurd, and this game will never end. If you want the government to have this level of control, one day you will find yourself in the minority, with your tax dollars getting siphoned off in huge amounts to support things you find offensive. And that too is wrong!
April 28, 2011 at 11:43 AM #690870jstoesz
ParticipantHonestly, I really don’t care. I was not trying to wade into the morality of the issue. I was not trying to cast stones or label who threw the first. I don’t care. But this issue that you all are having is not going to go away if we all agreed on homosexual curriculum. There will always be another issue to educate someone else’s kids about. Some other state of federal mandate for some other tertiary or even core issue. The real difference, the more basic disagreement, is one of control. How much do we want the federal or state government to politicize our child’s education? The very same people who were railing against Intelligent Design (no I do not wish to open this can of worms either) as not fit for schools are now in favor of gay sensitivity training. Their position has changed because the subject matter has changed.
If you can not admit that you want to teach other people’s kids your own worldview, then this discussion is pointless. The corollary here is that you also want to drown out other people’s world views in the process. This is absurd, and this game will never end. If you want the government to have this level of control, one day you will find yourself in the minority, with your tax dollars getting siphoned off in huge amounts to support things you find offensive. And that too is wrong!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.