- This topic has 685 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 11 months ago by
afx114.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 26, 2010 at 12:28 PM #17493May 26, 2010 at 12:37 PM #554357
Aecetia
ParticipantI was listening to the radio last night to a station with Fox News and they were saying the oil is quite toxic and affecting the health of the rescuers. It is tragic at many levels.
May 26, 2010 at 12:37 PM #554461ParticipantI was listening to the radio last night to a station with Fox News and they were saying the oil is quite toxic and affecting the health of the rescuers. It is tragic at many levels.
May 26, 2010 at 12:37 PM #554951ParticipantI was listening to the radio last night to a station with Fox News and they were saying the oil is quite toxic and affecting the health of the rescuers. It is tragic at many levels.
May 26, 2010 at 12:37 PM #555047ParticipantI was listening to the radio last night to a station with Fox News and they were saying the oil is quite toxic and affecting the health of the rescuers. It is tragic at many levels.
May 26, 2010 at 12:37 PM #555321ParticipantI was listening to the radio last night to a station with Fox News and they were saying the oil is quite toxic and affecting the health of the rescuers. It is tragic at many levels.
May 26, 2010 at 12:40 PM #554362briansd1
GuestThe oil gusher kills any argument in favor of the drill-baby-drill movement. That’s why Fox is only given scant coverage to the gusher.
Supporters of drilling have argued that technology now makes it safe to drill in sensitive, untouched natural areas.
The new drilling technology is not working and untested as evidenced by the oil gusher.
Drillers cannot guarantee that disaster won’t occur. And when a disaster does occur it takes months to plug a gushing well. Obviously, the technology is not there.
It’s now up to the public to decide whether they are willing to trust drillers with their own backyards, recreational areas and livelihoods.
May 26, 2010 at 12:40 PM #554466GuestThe oil gusher kills any argument in favor of the drill-baby-drill movement. That’s why Fox is only given scant coverage to the gusher.
Supporters of drilling have argued that technology now makes it safe to drill in sensitive, untouched natural areas.
The new drilling technology is not working and untested as evidenced by the oil gusher.
Drillers cannot guarantee that disaster won’t occur. And when a disaster does occur it takes months to plug a gushing well. Obviously, the technology is not there.
It’s now up to the public to decide whether they are willing to trust drillers with their own backyards, recreational areas and livelihoods.
May 26, 2010 at 12:40 PM #554956GuestThe oil gusher kills any argument in favor of the drill-baby-drill movement. That’s why Fox is only given scant coverage to the gusher.
Supporters of drilling have argued that technology now makes it safe to drill in sensitive, untouched natural areas.
The new drilling technology is not working and untested as evidenced by the oil gusher.
Drillers cannot guarantee that disaster won’t occur. And when a disaster does occur it takes months to plug a gushing well. Obviously, the technology is not there.
It’s now up to the public to decide whether they are willing to trust drillers with their own backyards, recreational areas and livelihoods.
May 26, 2010 at 12:40 PM #555051GuestThe oil gusher kills any argument in favor of the drill-baby-drill movement. That’s why Fox is only given scant coverage to the gusher.
Supporters of drilling have argued that technology now makes it safe to drill in sensitive, untouched natural areas.
The new drilling technology is not working and untested as evidenced by the oil gusher.
Drillers cannot guarantee that disaster won’t occur. And when a disaster does occur it takes months to plug a gushing well. Obviously, the technology is not there.
It’s now up to the public to decide whether they are willing to trust drillers with their own backyards, recreational areas and livelihoods.
May 26, 2010 at 12:40 PM #555326GuestThe oil gusher kills any argument in favor of the drill-baby-drill movement. That’s why Fox is only given scant coverage to the gusher.
Supporters of drilling have argued that technology now makes it safe to drill in sensitive, untouched natural areas.
The new drilling technology is not working and untested as evidenced by the oil gusher.
Drillers cannot guarantee that disaster won’t occur. And when a disaster does occur it takes months to plug a gushing well. Obviously, the technology is not there.
It’s now up to the public to decide whether they are willing to trust drillers with their own backyards, recreational areas and livelihoods.
May 26, 2010 at 12:59 PM #554372CBad
ParticipantI don’t watch Fox or regularly read their site but I just checked and this is currently their top story.
May 26, 2010 at 12:59 PM #554476ParticipantI don’t watch Fox or regularly read their site but I just checked and this is currently their top story.
May 26, 2010 at 12:59 PM #554965ParticipantI don’t watch Fox or regularly read their site but I just checked and this is currently their top story.
May 26, 2010 at 12:59 PM #555061ParticipantI don’t watch Fox or regularly read their site but I just checked and this is currently their top story.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.